• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

27G和25G玻璃体切割日间手术治疗增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变的手术效果

Surgical outcomes of 27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy day surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

作者信息

Naruse Zeon, Shimada Hiroyuki, Mori Ryusaburo

机构信息

Miyahara Ophthalmological Clinic, Saitama City, Saitama, Japan.

Department of Ophthalmology, Nihon University Hospital, 1-6 Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyodaku, Tokyo, 101-8309, Japan.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;39(9):1973-1980. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-1030-z. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10792-018-1030-z
PMID:30284092
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare postoperative outcomes of 27-gauge (G) and 25-G vitrectomy conducted as day surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

METHODS

One hundred eighty-five consecutive PDR patients (185 eyes) who underwent primary vitrectomy (27-G in 64 eyes, 25-G in 121 eyes) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The 27-G and 25-G groups did not differ significantly in preoperative Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score, age, or preoperative intraocular pressure. The proportions of simultaneous cataract surgery (27-G vs. 25-G: 59.4% vs. 62.4%) and air-filled eyes (76.6% vs. 85.1%) were not significantly different between two groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in ETDRS score at postoperative 1, 3, and 6 months (all, P < 0.0001). Mean gain in ETDRS score from baseline was apparently better in 27-G group than in 25-G group at 1, 3, and 6 months, but there were no significant differences (1 month: 20.3 vs. 13.1 letters, P = 0.0703; 3 months: 22.9 vs. 17.5 letters, P = 0.1561; 6 months: 24.3 vs. 19.3 letters, P = 0.3313). Operation time was apparently longer for 27-G vitrectomy, but there was no significant difference (54.0 vs. 51.1 min, P = 0.3676). The same was observed for postoperative intraocular pressure at postoperative day 1 (19.7 vs. 18.1 mmHg, P = 0.1353). Incidence of postoperative retinal detachment (1.6% vs. 0.8%) and reoperation due to vitreous hemorrhage (6.3% vs. 6.6%) was not different between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The 27G system is as safe and as useful as the 25G system when used for PDR and can be expected to achieve earlier recovery of postoperative visual acuity.

摘要

目的

比较27号(G)和25G玻璃体切割术作为日间手术治疗增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)的术后效果。

方法

分析185例连续接受初次玻璃体切割术的PDR患者(185只眼)(64只眼采用27G,121只眼采用25G)。

结果

27G组和25G组在术前糖尿病视网膜病变早期治疗研究(ETDRS)评分、年龄或术前眼压方面无显著差异。两组同时进行白内障手术的比例(27G组对25G组:59.4%对62.4%)和眼内填充气体的比例(76.6%对85.1%)无显著差异。两组在术后1、3和6个月时ETDRS评分均有显著改善(均P < 0.0001)。在1、3和6个月时,27G组ETDRS评分相对于基线的平均增加明显优于25G组,但无显著差异(1个月:20.3对13.1字母,P = 0.0703;3个月:22.9对17.5字母,P = 0.1561;6个月:24.3对19.3字母,P = 0.3313)。27G玻璃体切割术的手术时间明显更长,但无显著差异(54.0对51.1分钟,P = 0.3676)。术后第1天的术后眼压情况也是如此(19.7对18.1 mmHg,P = 0.1353)。两组术后视网膜脱离的发生率(1.6%对0.8%)和因玻璃体出血再次手术的发生率(6.3%对6.6%)无差异。

结论

27G系统用于PDR时与25G系统一样安全有效,有望实现术后视力的更早恢复。

相似文献

1
Surgical outcomes of 27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy day surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy.27G和25G玻璃体切割日间手术治疗增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变的手术效果
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;39(9):1973-1980. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-1030-z. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
2
27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy day surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane.用于特发性视网膜前膜的27G和25G玻璃体切割日间手术
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0585-1.
3
Comparative study of 27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy performed as day surgery.27G和25G玻璃体切割术日间手术的对比研究
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;38(4):1575-1582. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0625-0. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
4
Comparison of microinsicion vitrectomy and conventional 20-gauge vitrectomy for severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy.微切口玻璃体切除术与传统20G玻璃体切除术治疗重度增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变的比较
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep;59(5):288-94. doi: 10.1007/s10384-015-0396-y. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
5
Early postoperative intraocular pressure stability after combined 23-gauge sutureless vitrectomy and cataract surgery in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.增生型糖尿病视网膜病变患者行 23G 免缝线玻璃体切割联合白内障手术后的早期术后眼内压稳定性。
Retina. 2012 Oct;32(9):1767-74. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182475ad6.
6
Combined 23-gauge sutureless vitrectomy and clear corneal phacoemulsification in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.合并 23G 无缝线玻璃体切除术和透明角膜超声乳化术治疗增生性糖尿病视网膜病变。
Retina. 2011 Oct;31(9):1753-8. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31820d4057.
7
Microincision vitrectomy surgery and intravitreal bevacizumab as a surgical adjunct to treat diabetic traction retinal detachment.微创玻璃体切除术联合玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗作为手术辅助治疗糖尿病性牵拉性视网膜脱离。
Ophthalmology. 2009 May;116(5):927-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.11.005. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
8
BIMANUAL MICROINCISION VITREOUS SURGERY FOR SEVERE PROLIFERATIVE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY: OUTCOME IN MORE THAN 300 EYES.双手微创新技术玻璃体手术治疗严重增生性糖尿病视网膜病变:300 多只眼的结果。
Retina. 2018 Sep;38 Suppl 1:S134-S145. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002093.
9
Outcomes and complications of 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy.25G 经结膜无缝线玻璃体切除术治疗增生性糖尿病视网膜病变的结果和并发症。
Ophthalmologica. 2011;226(2):76-80. doi: 10.1159/000328407. Epub 2011 May 25.
10
23-gauge versus 25-gauge vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a comparison of surgical outcomes.23G与25G玻璃体切除术治疗增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变:手术结果比较
Ophthalmologica. 2015;233(2):104-11. doi: 10.1159/000369258. Epub 2014 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of 27-Gauge to 25-Gauge Vitrectomy in Patients with Tractional Retinal Detachment Associated with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.27G与25G玻璃体切除术治疗增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变伴牵引性视网膜脱离患者的比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 7;14(7):2533. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072533.
2
Outcomes of 23-Gauge Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Various Vitreoretinal Diseases.23G玻璃体切割术治疗各种玻璃体视网膜疾病的疗效
Cureus. 2024 Nov 4;16(11):e72991. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72991. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Outcomes, efficacy and risk factors of 27-Gauge vitrectomy for diabetic tractional retinal detachment in Japanese patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of 25- and 27-Gauge Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Repairing Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.25G和27G经平坦部玻璃体切除术修复原发性孔源性视网膜脱离的比较
J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun 25;2018:7643174. doi: 10.1155/2018/7643174. eCollection 2018.
2
A comparison between topical and retrobulbar anesthesia in 27-gauge vitrectomy for vitreous floaters: a randomized controlled trial.27G玻璃体切割术治疗玻璃体混浊时表面麻醉与球后麻醉的比较:一项随机对照试验
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul 7;18(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0838-7.
3
Long-Term Visual Outcomes and Safety Profile of 27-Gauge Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Posterior Segment Disease.
日本患者糖尿病性牵拉性视网膜脱离27G玻璃体切除术的治疗结果、疗效及危险因素
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan;69(1):59-65. doi: 10.1007/s10384-024-01135-6. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
4
Effect of ILM Peeling on Anatomical and Visual Outcomes in Diabetic Tractional Retinal Detachment.内界膜剥除术对糖尿病性牵拉性视网膜脱离解剖和视力预后的影响
Beyoglu Eye J. 2023 Sep 13;8(3):184-192. doi: 10.14744/bej.2023.26986. eCollection 2023.
5
27‑Gauge vitrectomy vs. 25‑gauge vitrectomy in the management of proliferative diabetic retinopathy with preoperative intravitreal injection of conbercept.术前玻璃体内注射康柏西普治疗增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变时27G玻璃体切除术与25G玻璃体切除术的对比
Exp Ther Med. 2023 Aug 17;26(4):472. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.12171. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Evaluation of twenty-seven-gauge vitrectomy for complex proliferative diabetic retinopathy.27G玻璃体切除术治疗复杂性增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变的评估
Oman J Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb 21;16(1):18-22. doi: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_348_21. eCollection 2023 Jan-Apr.
7
Silicone oil injection and removal in 27-gauge vitreous surgery.27G玻璃体手术中硅油的注入与取出
Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 18;16(1):139-142. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.01.21. eCollection 2023.
8
Same-Day Cancellation is Higher in Outpatient Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变门诊玻璃体切割术的当日取消率更高。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Oct 20;15:1965-1974. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S378510. eCollection 2022.
9
Clinical outcomes of a beveled tip, ultra-high speed, 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy system.一种斜面尖端、超高速度、25G 经睫状体平坦部玻璃体切割系统的临床结果。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb 24;22(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02311-3.
10
Intraocular pressure outcomes after 23-G vitreoretinal surgery with two different transconjunctival sutureless sclerotomy techniques: vertical versus tunnel entry.两种不同经结膜免缝线巩膜穿刺技术(垂直入路与隧道入路)行 23-G 玻璃体视网膜手术后的眼内压结果。
Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun;42(6):1763-1769. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-02172-7. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
27G 经睫状体平坦部玻璃体切除术治疗后节疾病的长期视觉效果和安全性分析。
Ophthalmology. 2018 Mar;125(3):423-431. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
4
SCLERAL BUCKLING FOR PRIMARY RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT USING A NONCONTACT WIDE-ANGLE VIEWING SYSTEM WITH A CANNULA-BASED 27-G CHANDELIER ENDOILLUMINATOR.使用基于套管的27G吊灯式内照明器的非接触广角观察系统进行原发性孔源性视网膜脱离的巩膜扣带术。
Retina. 2019 Oct;39 Suppl 1:S144-S150. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001891.
5
Prompt 27-gauge sutureless transconjunctival vitrectomy for bleb-associated endophthalmitis.用于滤过泡相关眼内炎的27G无缝线经结膜玻璃体切除术
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;38(6):2663-2668. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0747-4. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
6
27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy day surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane.用于特发性视网膜前膜的27G和25G玻璃体切割日间手术
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0585-1.
7
IN VITRO FLOW ANALYSIS OF NOVEL DOUBLE-CUTTING, OPEN-PORT, ULTRAHIGH-SPEED VITRECTOMY SYSTEMS.新型双切、开口、超高速玻璃体切割系统的体外血流分析。
Retina. 2018 Dec;38(12):2309-2316. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001882.
8
Influences of 27-Gauge Vitrectomy on Corneal Topographic Conditions.27G玻璃体切除术对角膜地形图状况的影响。
J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:8320909. doi: 10.1155/2017/8320909. Epub 2017 Aug 27.
9
Comparative study of 27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy performed as day surgery.27G和25G玻璃体切割术日间手术的对比研究
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;38(4):1575-1582. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0625-0. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
10
Surgical outcomes of 27-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with short-term postoperative tamponade of perfluorocarbon liquid for repair of giant retinal tears.27G玻璃体切割术联合全氟碳液体短期术后填塞治疗巨大视网膜裂孔的手术效果
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;38(4):1505-1513. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0613-4. Epub 2017 Jun 22.