Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, People's Republic of China.
Department of Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Jun 3;15:841-851. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S255305. eCollection 2020.
Although the mortality of elderly women with cervical cancer is high, their characteristics and prognosis have not attracted sufficient attention. This study aims to clarify the prognostic factors of cervical cancer patients aged ≥65.
The incidences and characteristics of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer (aged ≥65 and <65) during 2004-2015 were obtained through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. The differences of distributions of characteristics between two age groups were compared by chi-squared (χ) test. Kaplan-Meier survival method, Log-rank test, Cox-regression and visual nomogram were utilized for survival analysis.
The annual incidences of two age groups with cervical cancer were (5.5-7.5)/100,000 and (3.4-3.9)/100,000, respectively, during 2004-2015. The 1-year and 5-year cancer-specific survival rates of old patients were both lower than those of young patients ( <0.001). The proportions of unmarried state and advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage in old patients were higher than those in relatively young patients, and fewer elderly patients received surgery. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis showed non-squamous cell carcinoma, poor differentiation and late FIGO stage were independent poor prognostic factors for patients aged ≥65. Treatments improved the outcomes of elderly patients, and the effect of surgery was better than non-surgical treatment on elderly patients with FIGO I. Besides, geriatric score and survival probability could be accomplished by our nomogram with a c-index of 0.7945.
Delayed diagnosis and insufficient treatment were two distinct features of elderly patients and correlated with their poor clinical outcomes. More attention and active treatments should be adopted in elderly women based on their general condition.
尽管老年女性宫颈癌患者的死亡率较高,但她们的特征和预后尚未引起足够重视。本研究旨在明确年龄≥65 岁宫颈癌患者的预后因素。
通过 Surveillance,Epidemiology,and End Results Program(SEER)数据库获取 2004-2015 年诊断为宫颈癌(年龄≥65 岁和<65 岁)的患者发病率和特征。通过卡方(χ)检验比较两组年龄患者特征分布的差异。采用 Kaplan-Meier 生存法、Log-rank 检验、Cox 回归和可视化诺模图进行生存分析。
2004-2015 年两组年龄组宫颈癌的年发病率分别为(5.5-7.5)/100,000 和(3.4-3.9)/100,000。老年患者的 1 年和 5 年癌症特异性生存率均低于年轻患者(<0.001)。老年患者未婚状态和晚期国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分期的比例高于相对年轻的患者,且接受手术治疗的老年患者较少。单因素和多因素生存分析表明,非鳞状细胞癌、低分化和晚期 FIGO 分期是年龄≥65 岁患者的独立预后不良因素。治疗改善了老年患者的预后,且手术治疗对 FIGO I 期老年患者的效果优于非手术治疗。此外,我们的诺模图可通过计算年龄评分和生存概率,其 C 指数为 0.7945。
老年患者的特点是诊断延迟和治疗不足,这与其不良临床结局相关。应根据老年女性的一般情况,更加关注并积极治疗老年患者。