Cesarz Simone, Eva Schulz Annika, Beugnon Rémy, Eisenhauer Nico
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Institute of Biology, University of Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Soil Org. 2019 Aug 1;91(2):61-72. doi: 10.25674/so91201. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
Nematodes are increasingly used as powerful bioindicators of soil food web composition and functioning in ecological studies. Todays' ecological research aims to investigate not only local relationships but global patterns, which requires consistent methodology across locations. Thus, a common and easy extraction protocol of soil nematodes is needed. In this study, we present a detailed protocol of the Baermann-funnel method and highlight how different soil pre-treatments and equipment (soil type, soil height, sieving, and filter type) can affect extraction efficiency and community composition by using natural nematode communities. We found that highest nematode extraction efficiency was achieved using lowest soil height as indicated by the thickness of the soil sample in the extractor (1, 2, or 4 cm soil height) in combination with soil sieving (instead of no sieving), and by using milk filters (instead of paper towels). PCA at the family level revealed that different pre-treatments significantly affected nematode community composition. Increasing the height of the soil sample by adding more soil increased the proportion of larger-sized nematodes likely because those are able to overcome long distances but selected against small nematodes. Sieving is suggested to break up soil aggregates and, therefore, facilitate moving in general. Interestingly, sieving did not negatively affect larger nematodes that are supposed to have a higher probability of getting bruised during sieving but, even if not significant, tended to yield more extracted nematodes than no sieving. We therefore recommend to use small heights of sieved soil with milk filter to extract free-living soil nematodes with the Baermann-funnel method. The present study shows that variations in the extraction protocol can alter the total density and community composition of extracted nematodes and provides recommendations for an efficient and standardized approach in future studies. Having a simple, cheap, and standardized extraction protocol can facilitate the assessment of soil biodiversity in global contexts.
线虫越来越多地被用作生态研究中土壤食物网组成和功能的有力生物指标。当今的生态研究不仅旨在调查局部关系,还旨在研究全球模式,这需要各地采用一致的方法。因此,需要一种通用且简便的土壤线虫提取方案。在本研究中,我们展示了贝尔曼漏斗法的详细方案,并强调了不同的土壤预处理和设备(土壤类型、土壤高度、筛分和过滤类型)如何通过使用天然线虫群落影响提取效率和群落组成。我们发现,使用最低的土壤高度(由提取器中土壤样品的厚度表示,即1厘米、2厘米或4厘米土壤高度)并结合土壤筛分(而不是不筛分),以及使用牛奶过滤器(而不是纸巾),可实现最高的线虫提取效率。在科级水平上的主成分分析表明,不同的预处理显著影响线虫群落组成。增加土壤样品的高度(即添加更多土壤)会增加较大尺寸线虫的比例,这可能是因为它们能够克服较长距离,但不利于小型线虫。建议进行筛分以打破土壤团聚体,从而总体上便于移动。有趣的是,筛分并未对那些在筛分过程中被认为更有可能受到损伤的大型线虫产生负面影响,而且即使不显著,筛分往往比不筛分能提取到更多的线虫。因此,我们建议使用装有牛奶过滤器的小高度筛分土壤,通过贝尔曼漏斗法提取自由生活的土壤线虫。本研究表明,提取方案的变化会改变提取线虫的总密度和群落组成,并为未来研究提供了一种高效且标准化方法的建议。拥有一个简单、廉价且标准化的提取方案有助于在全球范围内评估土壤生物多样性。