• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一个变化较小的环境中定殖后,觅食创新是否会丧失?以地表与洞穴栖息动物为例的一项案例研究 。

Is foraging innovation lost following colonization of a less variable environment? A case study in surface- vs. cave-dwelling .

作者信息

Herczeg Gábor, Hafenscher Viktória P, Balázs Gergely, Fišer Žiga, Kralj-Fišer Simona, Horváth Gergely

机构信息

Behavioural Ecology Group Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology Biological Institute Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary.

Department of Biology Biotechnical Faculty University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2020 May 5;10(12):5323-5331. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6276. eCollection 2020 Jun.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.6276
PMID:32607155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7319158/
Abstract

Behavioral innovation is a key process for successful colonization of new habitat types. However, it is costly due to the necessary cognitive and neural demands and typically connected to ecological generalism. Therefore, loss of behavioral innovativeness is predicted following colonization of new, simple, and invariable environments. We tested this prediction by studying foraging innovativeness in the freshwater isopod . We sampled its populations along the route of colonizing a thermokarstic water-filled cave (simple, stable habitat with only bacterial mats as food) from surface habitats (variable environment, wide variety of food). The studied cave population separated from the surface populations at least 60,000 years ago. Animals were tested both with familiar and novel food types (cave food: bacterial mats; surface food: decaying leaves). Irrespective of food type, cave individuals were more likely to feed than surface individuals. Further, animals from all populations fed longer on leaves than on bacteria, even though leaves were novel for the cave animals. Our results support that cave did not lose the ability to use the ancestral (surface) food type after adapting to a simple, stable, and highly specialized habitat.

摘要

行为创新是成功定殖新栖息地类型的关键过程。然而,由于所需的认知和神经需求,它成本高昂,并且通常与生态泛化相关。因此,预计在定殖到新的、简单且不变的环境后,行为创新能力会丧失。我们通过研究淡水等足类动物的觅食创新能力来检验这一预测。我们沿着从地表栖息地(多变环境,食物种类繁多)定殖到热喀斯特充水洞穴(简单、稳定的栖息地,只有细菌垫作为食物)的路线对其种群进行采样。所研究的洞穴种群至少在6万年前就与地表种群分离了。我们用熟悉和新颖的食物类型对动物进行测试(洞穴食物:细菌垫;地表食物:腐烂的叶子)。无论食物类型如何,洞穴个体比地表个体更有可能进食。此外,尽管叶子对洞穴动物来说是新颖的,但所有种群的动物在叶子上进食的时间都比在细菌上长。我们的结果支持,洞穴动物在适应了简单、稳定且高度专业化的栖息地后,并没有丧失使用祖先(地表)食物类型的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd78/7319158/cfa58ee983dd/ECE3-10-5323-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd78/7319158/c93c016bd272/ECE3-10-5323-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd78/7319158/cfa58ee983dd/ECE3-10-5323-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd78/7319158/c93c016bd272/ECE3-10-5323-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd78/7319158/cfa58ee983dd/ECE3-10-5323-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Is foraging innovation lost following colonization of a less variable environment? A case study in surface- vs. cave-dwelling .在一个变化较小的环境中定殖后,觅食创新是否会丧失?以地表与洞穴栖息动物为例的一项案例研究 。
Ecol Evol. 2020 May 5;10(12):5323-5331. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6276. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Sex-dependent increase of movement activity in the freshwater isopod following adaptation to a predator-free cave habitat.淡水等足类动物适应无捕食者的洞穴栖息地后,运动活动出现性别依赖性增加。
Curr Zool. 2022 Aug 9;69(4):418-425. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoac063. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Comparative study of acetylcholinesterase and glutathione S-transferase activities of closely related cave and surface Asellus aquaticus (Isopoda: Crustacea).近缘洞穴型和地表型普通等足虫(等足目:甲壳纲)乙酰胆碱酯酶和谷胱甘肽S-转移酶活性的比较研究
PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0176746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176746. eCollection 2017.
4
Standing genetic variation as a potential mechanism of novel cave phenotype evolution in the freshwater isopod, Asellus aquaticus.作为潜在机制的立即可遗传变异,对淡水等足目动物新洞穴表型进化的影响。
Evol Dev. 2023 Mar;25(2):137-152. doi: 10.1111/ede.12428. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
5
A Transcriptomic Analysis of Cave, Surface, and Hybrid Isopod Crustaceans of the Species Asellus aquaticus.水生等足目甲壳动物洞穴型、表层型和杂交型的转录组分析
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 13;10(10):e0140484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140484. eCollection 2015.
6
Parallel morphological evolution and habitat-dependent sexual dimorphism in cave- vs. surface populations of the (Crustacea: Isopoda: Asellidae) species complex.洞穴与地表种群中(甲壳纲:等足目:阿塞尔科)物种复合体的平行形态进化及依赖栖息地的两性异形
Ecol Evol. 2021 Oct 20;11(21):15389-15403. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8233. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
The genomics of phenotypically differentiated Asellus aquaticus cave, surface stream and lake ecotypes.表型分化的水生栉水虱洞穴、地表溪流和湖泊生态型的基因组学研究。
Mol Ecol. 2021 Jul;30(14):3530-3547. doi: 10.1111/mec.15987. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
8
The role of isolation on contrasting phylogeographic patterns in two cave crustaceans.隔离在两种洞穴甲壳类动物对比系统发育地理格局中的作用。
BMC Evol Biol. 2017 Dec 7;17(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12862-017-1094-9.
9
Common Genetic Basis of Eye and Pigment Loss in Two Distinct Cave Populations of the Isopod Crustacean Asellus aquaticus.等足目甲壳动物水生潮虫两个不同洞穴种群眼睛和色素缺失的共同遗传基础。
Integr Comp Biol. 2018 Sep 1;58(3):421-430. doi: 10.1093/icb/icy028.
10
Genetic bias in repeated evolution of pigment loss in cave populations of the Asellus aquaticus species complex.遗传偏倚在盲鱼物种复合体洞穴种群中色素丧失的重复进化中。
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2024 Sep;342(6):425-436. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.23256. Epub 2024 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Embryology and Transcriptomics of Asellus infernus, an Isopod Crustacean From Sulfidic Groundwater.来自硫化地下水的等足类甲壳动物阿氏地鳖的比较胚胎学和转录组学
Evol Dev. 2025 Sep;27(3):e70014. doi: 10.1111/ede.70014.
2
Sex-dependent increase of movement activity in the freshwater isopod following adaptation to a predator-free cave habitat.淡水等足类动物适应无捕食者的洞穴栖息地后,运动活动出现性别依赖性增加。
Curr Zool. 2022 Aug 9;69(4):418-425. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoac063. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Parallel morphological evolution and habitat-dependent sexual dimorphism in cave- vs. surface populations of the (Crustacea: Isopoda: Asellidae) species complex.

本文引用的文献

1
Brain size predicts learning abilities in bees.大脑大小决定蜜蜂的学习能力。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 May 19;8(5):201940. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201940.
2
No need to hide in caves: shelter-seeking behavior of surface and cave ecomorphs of Asellus aquaticus (Isopoda: Crustacea).无需躲进洞穴:普通等足水虱(等足目:甲壳纲)地表型和洞穴型生态形态的避难行为
Zoology (Jena). 2019 Jun;134:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
3
Brain size affects performance in a reversal-learning test.大脑体积会影响反转学习测试中的表现。
洞穴与地表种群中(甲壳纲:等足目:阿塞尔科)物种复合体的平行形态进化及依赖栖息地的两性异形
Ecol Evol. 2021 Oct 20;11(21):15389-15403. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8233. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jan 31;285(1871). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2031.
4
The role of isolation on contrasting phylogeographic patterns in two cave crustaceans.隔离在两种洞穴甲壳类动物对比系统发育地理格局中的作用。
BMC Evol Biol. 2017 Dec 7;17(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12862-017-1094-9.
5
Importance of fungi in the diet of Gammarus pulex and Asellus aquaticus I: feeding strategies.真菌在蚤状溞和水虱饮食中的重要性I:摄食策略
Oecologia. 1993 Feb;93(1):139-144. doi: 10.1007/BF00321203.
6
Melanocortin 4 receptor mutations contribute to the adaptation of cavefish to nutrient-poor conditions.黑皮质素4受体突变有助于洞穴鱼适应营养匮乏的环境。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 4;112(31):9668-73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510802112. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
7
Distinct genetic architecture underlies the emergence of sleep loss and prey-seeking behavior in the Mexican cavefish.独特的遗传结构是墨西哥洞螈睡眠缺失和捕食行为出现的基础。
BMC Biol. 2015 Feb 20;13:15. doi: 10.1186/s12915-015-0119-3.
8
The cavefish genome reveals candidate genes for eye loss.洞穴鱼基因组揭示了导致眼睛退化的候选基因。
Nat Commun. 2014 Oct 20;5:5307. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6307.
9
Ecological generalism and behavioural innovation in birds: technical intelligence or the simple incorporation of new foods?鸟类的生态通用性与行为创新:是技术智能还是新食物的简单融入?
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Jan;84(1):79-89. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12255. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
10
Evolutionary ecology of intraspecific brain size variation: a review.种内大脑大小变化的进化生态学:综述。
Ecol Evol. 2013 Aug;3(8):2751-64. doi: 10.1002/ece3.627. Epub 2013 Jun 26.