Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Health Services Administration, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, MD.
Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug;55(4):587-595. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13315. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
To assess the extent to which all-cause 30-day readmission rate varies by Medicare program within the same hospitals.
We used conditional logistic regression clustered by hospital and generalized estimating equations to compare the odds of unplanned all-cause 30-day readmission between Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage (MA).
Wisconsin Health Information Organization collects claims data from various payers including private insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid, twice a year.
For 62 of 66 hospitals, hospital-level readmission rates for MA were lower than those for Medicare FFS. The odds of 30-day readmission in MA were 0.92 times lower than Medicare FFS within the same hospital (odds ratio, 0.93; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.89-0.98). The adjusted overall readmission rates of Medicare FFS and MA were 14.9 percent and 11.9 percent, respectively.
These findings provide additional evidence of potential variations in readmission risk by payer and support the need for improved monitoring systems in hospitals that incorporate payer-specific data. Further research is needed to delineate specific care delivery factors that contribute to differential readmission risk by payer source.
评估在同一家医院内,医疗保险计划之间全因 30 天再入院率的差异程度。
我们使用条件逻辑回归进行医院聚类,并采用广义估计方程比较医疗保险按服务收费(FFS)和医疗保险优势(MA)之间计划外全因 30 天再入院的可能性。
威斯康星州健康信息组织(Wisconsin Health Information Organization)从各种支付方(包括私人保险、医疗保险和医疗补助)收集索赔数据,每年收集两次。
在 66 家医院中的 62 家,MA 的医院层面再入院率低于 Medicare FFS。在同一家医院内,MA 发生 30 天再入院的可能性比 Medicare FFS 低 0.92 倍(比值比,0.93;95%置信区间,0.89-0.98)。Medicare FFS 和 MA 的调整后总体再入院率分别为 14.9%和 11.9%。
这些发现提供了更多关于支付方导致再入院风险差异的潜在证据,并支持需要在纳入特定支付方数据的医院中改进监测系统。需要进一步研究来确定导致按支付方来源产生不同再入院风险的具体医疗服务提供因素。