Chen Pan, Shi Xiao-Qing
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2020 Apr 8;41(4):1976-1986. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201909249.
Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE or e-waste) is a significant urban mine in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. A comprehensive and systematic assessment of the amount of e-waste generated in the region and the resources and environmental benefits of e-waste recycling can provide scientific basis and methods to support collaborative and accurate management of e-waste in the region to solve resource and environmental problems. Based on the improved ownership coefficient method, material coefficient method, market value method, and pollution coefficient method, this study predicted and evaluated the recycling potential and environmental benefits of e-waste in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei from 2010 to 2025 by estimating the production, amount of recyclable resources, resource recycling value, and environmental benefits of waste televisions, refrigerators, air conditioners, washing machines, and computers (five major e-wastes). The results show that the amount of five major e-wastes will increase continuously from 2010 to 2025, with an annual average growth rate of 7.75% during the period of 2010 to 2018, and it is expected to increase at 3.07% after that. In 2025, the amount of the five major e-wastes in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei will reach 1861.74×10 units, with recycling of ordinary metal, plastic, and precious metal to 27.19×10, 12.75×10, and 19.45 tons, respectively. From 2019 to 2025, the economic value of recycling waste air conditioners and computers will be relatively higher than that of other e-wastes. The sum of the economic value of waste air conditioners and computers is 77.22% of the total annual recycling value. The economic value contribution ratios of copper and gold are 43.37% and 19.82%, respectively, which are significantly higher than that of other resources. It is estimated that the total value of resource recovery in 2025 will reach 5.02 billion yuan, which is 3.13 times that in 2010. Among them, the recovery values of common metals, precious metals, and plastics will be 2.87, 1.33, and 0.83 billion yuan, respectively. If all the five major e-wastes generated in 2025 are recycled in a standardized way, it will reduce the exploitation of primary ores by 913.23×10 tons, the utilization of standard coal by 122.71×10 tons, the emission of waste water, waste gas, waste residue, and heavy metals by 1231.19×10, 473.89×10, 785.10×10, and 6.08×10 tons, respectively, and the emission of greenhouse gases by 32.92×10 tons CO-eq. Waste air conditioners have the greatest recycling potential, but the recycling capacity of waste air conditioners in processing enterprises needs to be improved urgently. To effectively exploit e-waste in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, the fund subsidy system should be improved as soon as possible, the supervision and management of informal dismantling departments should be strengthened, and a regional information sharing platform should be established to realize regional collaborative management of e-waste throughout its life cycle.
废弃电子电气设备(WEEE或电子垃圾)是京津冀地区一座重要的城市矿山。对该地区产生的电子垃圾数量以及电子垃圾回收利用的资源和环境效益进行全面系统的评估,可为支持该地区电子垃圾协同精准管理以解决资源和环境问题提供科学依据和方法。基于改进的拥有系数法、物质系数法、市场价值法和污染系数法,本研究通过估算废旧电视机、冰箱、空调、洗衣机和电脑(五大类电子垃圾)的产量、可回收资源量、资源回收价值和环境效益,对2010年至2025年京津冀地区电子垃圾的回收潜力和环境效益进行了预测和评估。结果表明,2010年至2025年五大类电子垃圾的数量将持续增加,2010年至2018年期间年平均增长率为7.75%,之后预计以3.07%的速度增长。2025年,京津冀地区五大类电子垃圾的数量将达到1861.74×10单位,普通金属、塑料和贵金属的回收量分别达到27.19×10、12.75×10和19.45吨。2019年至2025年,回收废旧空调和电脑的经济价值相对高于其他电子垃圾。废旧空调和电脑的经济价值之和占年度总回收价值的77.22%。铜和金的经济价值贡献率分别为43.37%和19.82%,显著高于其他资源。预计2025年资源回收总值将达到50.2亿元,是2010年的3.13倍。其中,普通金属、贵金属和塑料的回收价值分别为28.7亿元、13.3亿元和8.3亿元。如果2025年产生的所有五大类电子垃圾都得到规范回收,将分别减少原生矿石开采量913.23×10吨、标准煤用量122.71×10吨、废水、废气、废渣和重金属排放量1231.19×10、473.89×10、785.10×10和6.08×10吨,以及温室气体排放量32.92×10吨二氧化碳当量。废旧空调的回收潜力最大,但加工企业对废旧空调的回收处理能力亟待提高。为有效开发京津冀地区的电子垃圾,应尽快完善资金补贴制度,加强对非正规拆解部门的监管,并建立区域信息共享平台,以实现电子垃圾全生命周期的区域协同管理。