Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Diabetes. 2020 Dec;12(12):929-941. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13083. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
Creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is biased in the setting of obesity and other conditions. Alternative kidney filtration markers may be useful in adults with diabetes, but few studies examined the associations with risk of clinical outcomes.
In the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial, we evaluated whether baseline levels and change in eGFR based on creatinine (Cr), cystatin c (Cys), β -microglobulin (B2M), eGFR , and the average of three estimates (eGFR ) assessed in 7217 participants at baseline and a random sample of 640 participants at the 1-year visit are associated with clinical outcomes. We examined associations with major macrovascular and microvascular events together and separately and all-cause mortality using Cox regression models, adjusting for established risk factors.
Over a median follow-up of 5 years, 1313 major macrovascular (n = 748) and microvascular events (n = 637), and 743 deaths occurred. Lower levels of eGFR based on all filtration markers individually and combined were associated with 1.4 to 3.0 times higher risk of major macrovascular and microvascular events (combined and separately) and all-cause mortality. Per 30% decline in eGFR , eGFR , and eGFR were associated with a >2-fold higher risk of all clinical outcomes.
In adults with type 2 diabetes, baseline levels of eGFR based on alternative filtration markers and per 30% decline in eGFR , eGFR , and eGFR were associated with clinical outcomes. Measurement of alternative filtration markers, particularly B2M in adults with type 2 diabetes may be warranted.
基于肌酐的估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)在肥胖和其他情况下存在偏差。替代肾脏滤过标志物在糖尿病成人中可能有用,但很少有研究探讨其与临床结局风险的相关性。
在糖尿病和血管疾病行动:培哚普利与米格列醇联合治疗评估(ADVANCE)试验中,我们评估了基线时基于肌酐(Cr)、胱抑素 C(Cys)、β-微球蛋白(B2M)、eGFR 及在 7217 名参与者基线和 640 名随机参与者在第 1 年随访时评估的三个估计值(eGFR)的水平和变化是否与临床结局相关。我们使用 Cox 回归模型,在调整了已确定的危险因素后,综合和分别评估了与主要大血管和微血管事件以及全因死亡率的相关性。
在中位数为 5 年的随访中,发生了 1313 例主要大血管(n = 748)和微血管事件(n = 637),以及 743 例死亡。基于所有滤过标志物单独和组合的 eGFR 水平越低,与主要大血管和微血管事件(综合和分别)以及全因死亡率的风险增加 1.4 至 3.0 倍相关。eGFR、eGFR 和 eGFR 每下降 30%,与所有临床结局的风险增加超过 2 倍相关。
在 2 型糖尿病成人中,基于替代滤过标志物的基线 eGFR 水平和 eGFR、eGFR 和 eGFR 每下降 30%与临床结局相关。在 2 型糖尿病成人中,测量替代滤过标志物,特别是 B2M,可能是合理的。