Suppr超能文献

识别腰痛中神经病理性疼痛机制的感觉描述符:系统评价。

Sensory descriptors which identify neuropathic pain mechanisms in low back pain: a systematic review.

机构信息

Rheumatology Unit, Physiotherapy Department, Our Lady's Hospital Manorhamilton, Co. Leitrim, Ireland.

Michelle Heraughty Physiotherapy, Co. Sligo, Ireland.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Oct;36(10):1695-1706. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1790349. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Descriptors provided by patients with neuropathic low back pain (NLBP) with or without spinally referred leg pain are frequently used by clinicians to help to identify the predominant pain mechanisms. Indeed, many neuropathic screening tools are primarily based on subjective descriptors to determine the presence of neuropathic pain. There is a need to systematically review and analyse the existing evidence to determine the validity of such descriptors in this cohort.

METHODS

Ten databases were systematically searched. The review adhered to PRISMA and CRD guidelines and included a risk of bias assessment using QUADAS-2. Studies were included if they contained symptom descriptors from a group of NLBP patients +/- leg pain. Studies had to include a reference test to identity neuropathic pain from other pain mechanisms.

RESULTS

Eight studies of 3099 NLBP patients were included. Allodynia and numbness were found to discriminate between NLBP and nociceptive LBP in four studies. Autonomic dysfunction, (changes in the colour or appearance of the skin), was also found to discriminate between the groups in two studies. Dysesthesia identified NLBP in 5/7 respectively. Results from studies were equivocal regarding pain described as hot/burning cold and paroxysmal pain in people with NLBP.

CONCLUSION

Subjectively reported allodynia and numbness would suggest a neuropathic pain mechanism in LBP. Dysesthesia would raise the suspicion of NLBP. More research is needed to determine if descriptors suggesting autonomic dysfunction can identify NLBP. There is poor consensus on whether other descriptors can identify NLBP.

摘要

目的

有或无放射性下肢痛的神经性腰痛(NLBP)患者提供的描述符常被临床医生用于帮助识别主要的疼痛机制。事实上,许多神经性筛查工具主要基于主观描述符来确定神经性疼痛的存在。需要系统地回顾和分析现有证据,以确定这些描述符在该队列中的有效性。

方法

系统搜索了 10 个数据库。该综述遵循 PRISMA 和 CRD 指南,并使用 QUADAS-2 进行了偏倚风险评估。如果研究包含一组 NLBP 患者 +/-下肢痛的症状描述符,则将其纳入研究。研究必须包括参考测试,以确定神经病理性疼痛与其他疼痛机制。

结果

纳入了 8 项共 3099 例 NLBP 患者的研究。四项研究发现,感觉过敏和麻木可区分 NLBP 和伤害感受性 LBP。两项研究还发现,自主神经功能障碍(皮肤颜色或外观的变化)也可区分两组。五项研究中的五项研究分别发现感觉异常可识别 NLBP。关于 NLBP 患者的热/烧灼感、阵发性疼痛的研究结果存在分歧。

结论

主观报告的感觉过敏和麻木提示 LBP 存在神经性疼痛机制。感觉异常会增加 NLBP 的怀疑。需要进一步研究以确定是否提示自主神经功能障碍的描述符可以识别 NLBP。其他描述符是否可以识别 NLBP尚存在共识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验