Klein Samuel P, Fieuws Steffen, Meyfroidt Geert, Depreitere Bart
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre (L-BioStat), KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Feb 15;38(4):506-512. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7160. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
Effects of treatment-associated variables on cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) in acute brain injury patients remain unclear. As deficient CA is associated with worse outcomes and ideas about CA-steered management are emerging, this question is relevant. We investigated effects of norepinephrine and propofol infusion rates and hemoglobin concentration on dynamic measurements of cerebrovascular reactivity as surrogate for CA. A retrospective analysis of 91 traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 13 stroke patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Leuven University Hospitals was performed. Low-resolution autoregulation index (LAx) and high-frequency pressure reactivity index (PRx) were calculated as measurements of cerebrovascular reactivity. Data was binned into 5-, 15-, and 60-min intervals. Bivariate time-series analysis using lagged cross-correlations were calculated after pre-whitening and differencing. Linear mixed models evaluated effects of age, gender, cardiovascular risk, brain comorbidity, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), pupil reactivity, and type of injury. Median dose of norepinephrine, propofol and hemoglobin concentration was 7.8 μg/kg/h (Q1 3.6-Q3 13.8), 3 mg/kg/h (Q1 1.9-Q3 4.3), and 9.2 g·dL (Q1 8.2-Q3 10.5), respectively. Mean cross-correlations for 24 lags were close to zero and not significant for all variables. No significant differences as function of age, gender, cardiovascular risk, brain comorbidity, GCS, pupil reactivity, and type of injury were found. Dynamic intracranial pressure-based measurements of cerebrovascular reactivity in acute brain injured patients are not affected by gradually adjusted norepinephrine or propofol infusion rates or slow changes in hemoglobin concentration within the typical ranges during ICU admission. Future trials on cerebrovascular reactivity-steered management and treatment of CA impairment may not have to take these variables into account.
治疗相关变量对急性脑损伤患者脑血管自动调节(CA)的影响尚不清楚。由于CA功能不足与更差的预后相关,且关于CA导向管理的理念正在兴起,因此这个问题具有相关性。我们研究了去甲肾上腺素和丙泊酚输注速率以及血红蛋白浓度对脑血管反应性动态测量的影响,以此作为CA的替代指标。对鲁汶大学医院重症监护病房(ICU)收治的91例创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者和13例中风患者进行了回顾性分析。计算低分辨率自动调节指数(LAx)和高频压力反应性指数(PRx)作为脑血管反应性的测量指标。数据按5分钟、15分钟和60分钟的间隔进行分组。在进行预白化和差分后,使用滞后交叉相关性进行双变量时间序列分析。线性混合模型评估了年龄、性别、心血管风险、脑部合并症、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、瞳孔反应性和损伤类型的影响。去甲肾上腺素、丙泊酚的中位剂量和血红蛋白浓度分别为7.8μg/kg/h(第一四分位数3.6 - 第三四分位数13.8)、3mg/kg/h(第一四分位数1.9 - 第三四分位数4.3)和9.2g·dL(第一四分位数8.2 - 第三四分位数10.5)。24个滞后的平均交叉相关性接近零,且对所有变量均无统计学意义。未发现年龄、性别、心血管风险、脑部合并症、GCS、瞳孔反应性和损伤类型之间存在显著差异。急性脑损伤患者基于动态颅内压的脑血管反应性测量不受ICU住院期间逐渐调整的去甲肾上腺素或丙泊酚输注速率或血红蛋白浓度在典型范围内缓慢变化的影响。未来关于脑血管反应性导向管理和CA损伤治疗的试验可能无需考虑这些变量。