Suppr超能文献

快速诊断检测在丙型肝炎病毒合并或不合并 HIV 感染中的敏感性和特异性:一项多中心实验室评估研究。

Sensitivity and Specificity of Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Hepatitis C Virus With or Without HIV Coinfection: A Multicentre Laboratory Evaluation Study.

机构信息

Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.

Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 26;226(3):420-430. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa389.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening is critical to HCV elimination efforts. Simplified diagnostics are required for low-resource settings and difficult-to-reach populations. This retrospective study assessed performance of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for detection of HCV antibodies.

METHODS

Two lots of 13 RDTs were evaluated at 3 laboratories using archived plasma samples from 4 countries (Nigeria, Georgia, Cambodia, and Belgium). HCV status was determined using 3 reference tests according to a composite algorithm. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected populations. Operational characteristics were also assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 1710 samples met inclusion criteria. In HIV-uninfected samples (n = 384), the majority of RDTs had sensitivity ≥98% in 1 or both lots and most RDTs had specificity ≥99%. In HIV-infected samples (n = 264), specificity remained high but sensitivity was markedly lower than in HIV-uninfected samples; only 1 RDT reached >95%. The majority of HIV-infected samples for which sensitivity was low did not have detectable HCV viral load/core antigen. Interreader variability, lot-to-lot variability, and rate of invalid runs were low for all RDTs (<2%).

CONCLUSIONS

HCV RDTs should be evaluated in the intended target population, as sensitivity can be impacted by population factors such as HIV status.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT04033887.

摘要

背景

丙型肝炎病毒 (HCV) 筛查对于 HCV 消除工作至关重要。简化诊断对于资源匮乏的环境和难以到达的人群是必要的。本回顾性研究评估了用于检测 HCV 抗体的快速诊断检测 (RDT) 的性能。

方法

在 3 个实验室使用来自 4 个国家(尼日利亚、格鲁吉亚、柬埔寨和比利时)的存档血浆样本评估了 2 批共 13 种 RDT。HCV 状态根据综合算法使用 3 种参考测试确定。在 HIV 感染和未感染人群中评估了敏感性和特异性。还评估了操作特性。

结果

共有 1710 个样本符合纳入标准。在 HIV 未感染样本(n = 384)中,大多数 RDT 在 1 批或 2 批中均具有≥98%的敏感性,大多数 RDT 具有≥99%的特异性。在 HIV 感染样本(n = 264)中,特异性仍然较高,但敏感性明显低于 HIV 未感染样本;只有 1 种 RDT 达到了>95%。敏感性较低的大多数 HIV 感染样本没有检测到 HCV 病毒载量/核心抗原。所有 RDT 的批内和批间变异以及无效运行率均较低(<2%)。

结论

HCV RDT 应在预期的目标人群中进行评估,因为敏感性可能会受到人群因素(如 HIV 状态)的影响。

临床试验注册

NCT04033887。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c4d/9417120/8b74e3500267/jiaa389f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验