Feinman Gary M, Cervantes Quequezana Gabriela, Green Adam, Lawrence Dan, Munson Jessica, Ortman Scott, Petrie Cameron, Thompson Amy, Nicholas Linda M
Negaunee Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605.
Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Apr 22;122(16):e2400698121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400698121. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
Long-entrenched grand narratives have tied inequality in large human aggregations to generally linear trends, a direct outcome of domestication, then fostered by population growth and/or stepped scalar transitions in the hierarchical complexity of human institutions. This general pattern has been argued to short-circuit or reverse only in the context of cataclysmic disasters or societal breakdowns. Yet, for the most part, these universal deterministic frameworks have been constructed from historical or ethnographic snapshots in time and afford little systematic attention to human institutions or agency. Here, we leverage quantitative, temporally defined archaeological, and ethnographic data from a suite of global regions, most of which transitioned through the process of urbanism and complex hierarchy formation, to examine shifts in degrees of inequality over time. Although broad temporal patterns are evidenced, the regional trends in inequality are neither linear, uniform, nor triggered immediately or mechanically by Malthusian dynamics or scalar increases.
长期以来根深蒂固的宏大叙事将大型人类群体中的不平等与普遍的线性趋势联系在一起,这是驯化的直接结果,随后又受到人口增长和/或人类制度等级复杂性中逐步的规模转变的推动。有人认为,这种总体模式只有在灾难性灾难或社会崩溃的背景下才会短路或逆转。然而,在很大程度上,这些普遍的决定论框架是根据历史或民族志的时间快照构建的,很少系统地关注人类制度或能动性。在这里,我们利用来自一系列全球区域的定量的、按时间定义的考古和民族志数据,其中大多数区域都经历了城市化和复杂等级制度形成的过程,以研究不平等程度随时间的变化。尽管有广泛的时间模式的证据,但不平等的区域趋势既不是线性的、统一的,也不是由马尔萨斯动态或规模增长立即或机械地引发的。