• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

厘清健康信息评估能力:来自瑞士利益相关者的跨学科范围审查和在线咨询的结果。

Disentangling health information appraisal competence: Results from an interdisciplinary scoping review and online consultation among Swiss stakeholders.

机构信息

University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0235474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235474. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0235474
PMID:32614869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7332022/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ability to critically appraise health information-often referred to as critical health literacy-is recognized as a crucial component of health literacy. Yet to date, it is not clear what specific abilities are needed to adequately accomplish this task, thereby hindering both its assessment and the development and evaluation of related interventions. By systematically building on past research, this study aimed to operationally define the concept of health information appraisal competence.

METHODS

We systematically searched five scholarly databases to identify the conceptualizations and operational definitions of information appraisal in different disciplines. The resulting operationalization was subsequently validated through an online consultation exercise among 85 Swiss stakeholders.

RESULTS

Ninety-four publications were included in the review to the point of saturation. We extracted 646 skills, attitudes, and knowledge for health information appraisal. We then collated overlapping or duplicate statements, which produced a list of 43 unique statements belonging to six emergent themes or core competences: (1) basic competence, (2) predisposition, (3) identification competence, (4) critical evaluation competence, (5) selection competence, and (6) application competence. The consultation exercise enriched the operationalization of some of the core competences and confirmed the importance of all competences. Most skills, attitudes, and knowledge, however, were assigned low feasibility by the stakeholders.

CONCLUSIONS

This study was the first attempt to systematically operationalize health information appraisal competence. From a theoretical perspective, it sheds light on an understudied, health literacy domain, thus contributing to clarity around the concept. From a practical perspective, it provides a strong theoretical basis for the development of a tool to measure health information appraisal competence. This could be used routinely as a screening tool, as an outcome measure for public health interventions, or to identify citizens who are most at risk. Furthermore, it will provide support for the development of future interventions to build health information appraisal competence in the population.

摘要

背景

批判性评估健康信息的能力——通常被称为批判性健康素养——被认为是健康素养的一个重要组成部分。然而,迄今为止,尚不清楚完成这项任务需要哪些具体能力,从而阻碍了对其的评估以及相关干预措施的制定和评估。本研究通过系统地借鉴以往的研究,旨在对健康信息评估能力这一概念进行操作定义。

方法

我们系统地检索了五个学术数据库,以确定不同学科中信息评估的概念化和操作定义。随后,通过 85 名瑞士利益相关者的在线咨询,对得出的操作定义进行了验证。

结果

共有 94 篇文献被纳入到了综述中,达到了饱和状态。我们提取了 646 项健康信息评估的技能、态度和知识。然后,我们整理了重叠或重复的陈述,得出了属于六个新兴主题或核心能力的 43 个独特陈述:(1)基本能力,(2)倾向,(3)识别能力,(4)批判性评估能力,(5)选择能力,(6)应用能力。咨询丰富了一些核心能力的操作化内容,并确认了所有能力的重要性。然而,大多数技能、态度和知识都被利益相关者认为可行性较低。

结论

这是首次尝试系统地操作化健康信息评估能力。从理论角度来看,它阐明了一个研究不足的健康素养领域,从而有助于澄清该概念。从实践角度来看,它为开发衡量健康信息评估能力的工具提供了坚实的理论基础。该工具可以常规用作筛查工具,作为公共卫生干预措施的结果测量,或用于识别最容易受到影响的公民。此外,它将为发展未来干预措施提供支持,以在人群中建立健康信息评估能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/911e/7332022/a1ed8e0b198c/pone.0235474.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/911e/7332022/a1ed8e0b198c/pone.0235474.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/911e/7332022/a1ed8e0b198c/pone.0235474.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Disentangling health information appraisal competence: Results from an interdisciplinary scoping review and online consultation among Swiss stakeholders.厘清健康信息评估能力:来自瑞士利益相关者的跨学科范围审查和在线咨询的结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0235474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235474. eCollection 2020.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Health Literacy in Web-Based Health Information Environments: Systematic Review of Concepts, Definitions, and Operationalization for Measurement.基于网络的健康信息环境中的健康素养:概念、定义及测量操作化的系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 19;20(12):e10273. doi: 10.2196/10273.
4
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
5
A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.生物医学期刊科学编辑能力的范围综述。
BMC Med. 2016 Feb 2;14:16. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0561-2.
6
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
7
Effects of health literacy interventions on health-related outcomes in socioeconomically disadvantaged adults living in the community: a systematic review.健康素养干预措施对社区中社会经济地位不利的成年人健康相关结局的影响:一项系统评价
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Jul;18(7):1389-1469. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-18-00023.
8
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Interventions for improving health literacy in migrants.改善移民健康素养的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 14;11(11):CD013303. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013303.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Conceptualisation of critical health literacy-insights from Western and East Asian perspectives: a scoping review.从西方和东亚视角看关键健康素养的概念化:一项范围综述
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 May 15;10(5):e018232. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018232.
2
Factors influencing the integration of self-management in daily life routines in chronic conditions: a scoping review of qualitative evidence.影响慢性病患者将自我管理融入日常生活常规的因素:定性证据的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 30;12(12):e066647. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066647.
3
Strengthening Critical Health Literacy for Health Information Appraisal: An Approach from Argumentation Theory.

本文引用的文献

1
On the Centrality of Information Appraisal in Health Literacy Research.信息评估在健康素养研究中的核心地位
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Feb 5;3(1):e21-e24. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20181214-01. eCollection 2019 Jan.
2
What Is Case Management? A Scoping and Mapping Review.什么是病例管理?一项范围界定与图谱综述。
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Oct 19;16(4):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2477.
3
Perceived and Performed eHealth Literacy: Survey and Simulated Performance Test.感知与实践的电子健康素养:调查与模拟性能测试。
强化健康信息评估的关键健康素养:来自论证理论的方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 23;18(13):6764. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136764.
JMIR Hum Factors. 2017 Jan 17;4(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.6523.
4
Concept mapping as an approach for expert-guided model building: The example of health literacy.概念图作为专家指导模型构建的一种方法:以健康素养为例。
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Feb;60:245-253. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
5
Complementary Medicine Health Literacy among a Population of Older Australians Living in Retirement Villages: A Mixed Methods Study.澳大利亚退休村老年人群的补充医学健康素养:一项混合方法研究
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:5672050. doi: 10.1155/2016/5672050. Epub 2016 Jun 26.
6
The Status of Health Literacy Research in Health Communication and Opportunities for Future Scholarship.健康传播中健康素养研究的现状及未来学术研究的机遇
Health Commun. 2017 Feb;32(2):211-218. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2015.1114065. Epub 2016 May 19.
7
Health Literacy Measure for Adolescents (HELMA): Development and Psychometric Properties.青少年健康素养测评(HELMA):开发与心理测量特性
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 16;11(2):e0149202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149202. eCollection 2016.
8
Assessing the influence of health literacy on health information behaviors: A multi-domain skills-based approach.评估健康素养对健康信息行为的影响:一种基于多领域技能的方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jun;99(6):1038-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.017. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
9
Individual Responsibility and Community Solidarity--The Swiss Health Care System.个人责任与社区团结——瑞士医疗体系
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 3;373(23):2193-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1508256.
10
Health Literacy Research and Practice: A Needed Paradigm Shift.《健康素养研究与实践:亟需的范式转变》
Health Commun. 2015;30(12):1176-80. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2015.1037426.