Visvanathan Renuka, Amare Azmeraw T, Lang Catherine, Khadka Jyoti, Yu Solomon, Beilby Justin, Wesselingh Steve, Inacio Maria C
National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Aged and Extended Care Services, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Age Ageing. 2021 Jan 8;50(1):120-126. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa091.
(i) to describe the general practitioner utilisation of health assessments, management plans, coordination of team care arrangements and medication review item numbers within 6 months of an aged care eligibility assessment for home care packages (HCP) and (ii) investigate the impact of health assessments on the risk of mortality and entry into permanent residential aged care (PRAC) of individuals accessing HCP.
retrospective cohort study utilising data from the Registry of Senior Australians (ROSA) was conducted.
75,172 individuals aged ≥75 years who received HCP between 2011 and 2015.
for objective 1: the use of comprehensive assessments (Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) items 705 or 707), management plans (MBS 721), coordination of team care arrangements (MBS 723), and medication reviews (MBS 900). For objective 2: time to death and entry into PRAC.
of the 75,172 individuals, 28.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 27.8-8.5%) had comprehensive assessments, 36.7% (95% CI: 36.3-37.0%) had management plans, 33.0% (95% CI: 32.7-33.3%) received coordination of team care arrangements and 5.4% (95% CI: 5.2-5.5%) had medication reviews. Individuals with a comprehensive assessment had a 5% lower risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 95% CI = 0.95, 0.92-0.98) but 5% higher risk of transition to PRAC (adjusted subdistribution HRs, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.02-1.08) compared to those who did not have these services.
the utilisation of health assessments was associated with a lower risk of mortality. There is an opportunity for increased use of item numbers in frailer individuals.
(i)描述家庭护理包(HCP)老年护理资格评估后6个月内全科医生对健康评估、管理计划、团队护理安排协调及药物审查项目编号的使用情况;(ii)调查健康评估对接受HCP的个人死亡风险及进入永久性老年居住护理(PRAC)的影响。
利用澳大利亚老年人登记处(ROSA)的数据进行回顾性队列研究。
2011年至2015年间接受HCP的75172名年龄≥75岁的个体。
针对目标1:综合评估(医疗保险福利计划(MBS)项目705或707)、管理计划(MBS 721)、团队护理安排协调(MBS 723)及药物审查(MBS 900)的使用情况。针对目标2:死亡时间及进入PRAC的时间。
在75172名个体中,28.2%(95%置信区间(CI):27.8 - 28.5%)接受了综合评估,36.7%(95% CI:36.3 - 37.0%)有管理计划,33.0%(95% CI:32.7 - 33.3%)接受了团队护理安排协调,5.4%(95% CI:5.2 - 5.5%)进行了药物审查。与未接受这些服务的个体相比,接受综合评估的个体死亡风险降低5%(调整后风险比(aHR),95% CI = 0.95,0.92 - 0.98),但转入PRAC的风险升高5%(调整后亚分布风险比,95% CI = 1.05,1.02 - 1.08)。
健康评估的使用与较低的死亡风险相关。在身体更虚弱的个体中,有增加项目编号使用的机会。