Suppr超能文献

2017-2019 年澳大利亚居家照护接受者在获得照护前后的主要、辅助医疗、精选专科医生和精神健康服务的使用情况。

Primary, allied health, selected specialists, and mental health service utilisation by home care recipients in Australia before and after accessing the care, 2017-2019.

机构信息

Registry of Senior Australians (ROSA), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024 Mar 29;36(1):83. doi: 10.1007/s40520-024-02731-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine changes in primary, allied health, selected specialists, and mental health service utilisation by older people in the year before and after accessing home care package (HCP) services.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using the Registry of Senior Australians Historical National Cohort (≥ 65 years old), including individuals accessing HCP services between 2017 and 2019 (N = 109,558), was conducted. The utilisation of general practice (GP) attendances, health assessments, chronic disease management plans, allied health services, geriatric, pain, palliative, and mental health services, subsidised by the Australian Government Medicare Benefits Schedule, was assessed in the 12 months before and after HCP access, stratified by HCP level (1-2 vs. 3-4, i.e., lower vs. higher care needs). Relative changes in service utilisation 12 months before and after HCP access were estimated using adjusted risk ratios (aRR) from Generalised Estimating Equation Poisson models.

RESULTS

Utilisation of health assessments (7-10.2%), chronic disease management plans (19.7-28.2%), and geriatric, pain, palliative, and mental health services (all ≤ 2.5%) remained low, before and after HCP access. Compared to 12 months prior to HCP access, 12 months after, GP after-hours attendances increased (HCP 1-2 from 6.95 to 7.5%, aRR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.11; HCP 3-4 from 7.76 to 9.32%, aRR = 1.20, 95%CI 1.13-1.28) and allied health services decreased (HCP 1-2 from 34.8 to 30.7%, aRR = 0.88, 95%CI 0.87-0.90; HCP levels 3-4 from 30.5 to 24.3%, aRR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.77-0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

Most MBS subsidised preventive, management and specialist services are underutilised by older people, both before and after HCP access and small changes are observed after they access HCP.

摘要

目的

调查老年人在获得家庭护理包(HCP)服务前后一年内主要医疗、辅助医疗、特定专科和心理健康服务的使用变化情况。

方法

采用回顾性队列研究,利用 Registry of Senior Australians Historical National Cohort(≥65 岁),纳入 2017 年至 2019 年期间接受 HCP 服务的个体(n=109558)。使用澳大利亚政府医疗保险福利计划补贴的普通诊所就诊、健康评估、慢性病管理计划、辅助医疗服务、老年科、疼痛、姑息治疗和心理健康服务的使用情况,在 HCP 服务前 12 个月和后 12 个月进行评估,按 HCP 级别(1-2 级与 3-4 级,即低与高护理需求)进行分层。使用广义估计方程泊松模型调整后的风险比(aRR)估计 HCP 服务前后 12 个月服务利用的相对变化。

结果

HCP 服务前后,健康评估(7-10.2%)、慢性病管理计划(19.7-28.2%)和老年科、疼痛、姑息治疗和心理健康服务(均≤2.5%)的使用率仍较低。与 HCP 服务前 12 个月相比,HCP 服务后 12 个月,普通诊所下班后就诊增加(HCP 1-2 级从 6.95%增加到 7.5%,aRR=1.07,95%CI 1.03-1.11;HCP 3-4 级从 7.76%增加到 9.32%,aRR=1.20,95%CI 1.13-1.28),辅助医疗服务减少(HCP 1-2 级从 34.8%减少到 30.7%,aRR=0.88,95%CI 0.87-0.90;HCP 3-4 级从 30.5%减少到 24.3%,aRR=0.80,95%CI 0.77-0.82)。

结论

大多数 MBS 补贴的预防性、管理性和专科服务在老年人获得 HCP 服务前后均未得到充分利用,且在获得 HCP 服务后仅观察到微小变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e8a/10980604/51bab86186a3/40520_2024_2731_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验