Robinson C J, Kett N A, Bolam J M
Rehabilitation Research and Development Center, Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL 60141.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988 Aug;69(8):598-604.
Twelve spinal cord injured subjects participated in a study of the short-term effects on leg spasticity of electrical stimulation of the quadriceps. Spasticity was quantified through the use of a normalized relaxation index (R2n) obtained from the pendulum drop test both before and after measurement of isometric quadriceps torque in response to 20 minutes of cyclic electrical stimulation. Two or three baseline evaluations were made on each subject, tests being at least one day apart. By comparing the first prestimulus baseline assessment of spasticity with that obtained poststimulus, we obtained a measure of changes in spasticity brought about by fatiguing exercise. We found that spasticity significantly (p less than or equal to 0.005) decreased after stimulation. To investigate whether this change was due to electrical stimulation or was a function of the performance of the drop test itself (ie, passive range of motion of the knees), drop-to-drop variability during the pendulum drop test both before and after stimulation was assessed. A comparison was made of the R2n value of the last drop before stimulation to that of the first drop afterward, to assess the direct effect of stimulation on spasticity. Spasticity decreased significantly (p less than or equal to 0.05) during the leg ranging inherent in the drop test itself, particularly for subjects with shorter times postinjury. Spasticity also decreased significantly as a direct result of electrical stimulation. This latter change could be accounted for by an interaction of peak quadriceps torque and the initial measure of spasticity before stimulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
12名脊髓损伤受试者参与了一项关于股四头肌电刺激对腿部痉挛短期影响的研究。通过在对股四头肌进行20分钟的周期性电刺激后测量等长肌力前后,利用从摆锤下落试验获得的标准化松弛指数(R2n)对痉挛进行量化。对每个受试者进行两到三次基线评估,测试间隔至少一天。通过比较刺激前痉挛的第一次基线评估与刺激后获得的评估,我们获得了疲劳运动引起的痉挛变化的测量值。我们发现刺激后痉挛显著降低(p≤0.005)。为了研究这种变化是由于电刺激还是摆锤下落试验本身的操作(即膝盖的被动活动范围)所致,评估了刺激前后摆锤下落试验期间逐次下落的变异性。比较了刺激前最后一次下落的R2n值与刺激后第一次下落的R2n值,以评估刺激对痉挛的直接影响。在下落试验本身固有的腿部活动范围内,痉挛显著降低(p≤0.05),尤其是对于受伤时间较短的受试者。痉挛也因电刺激而显著降低。后一种变化可由股四头肌峰值扭矩与刺激前痉挛初始测量值的相互作用来解释。(摘要截短于250字)