Thomaz Sergio Ricardo, Cipriano Gerson, Formiga Magno Ferreira, Fachin-Martins Emerson, Cipriano Graziella França Bernardelli, Martins Wagner Rodrigues, Cahalin Lawrence Patrick
Health Sciences and Technologies, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Brasilia, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Doctoral Program in Physical Education and Rehabilitation Science, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
Spinal Cord. 2019 Apr;57(4):258-266. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0250-z. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
This work is a systematic review with meta-analysis OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effect of electrical stimulation (ES) on skeletal muscle volume and spasticity in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).
University of Brasilia, Brazil METHODS: Searches were conducted of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PEDro, PsycINFO and EMBASE electronic databases for relevant articles published up to June 2018. No restrictions were imposed regarding the year of publication. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials involving adults with SCI comparing ES to an active or passive control. Two independent reviewers extracted the data from the selected studies and methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale.
The initial search led to the retrieval of 164 studies, seven of which met the eligibility criteria, but only six were included in the meta-analysis. The six studies comprised 104 patients with complete or incomplete SCI. In the two studies that investigated the use of ES on muscle volume of the lower limbs, the overall effect was statistically significant in patients with acute SCI (mean difference: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.04 to 1.69; p < 0.04). Among the four studies that examined the use of ES for spasticity of the lower limb, the overall effect was non-significant (mean difference: 0.55; 95% CI: -0.31 to 1.41; p = 0.21).
Electrical stimulation was found to be an effective method for increasing muscle volume in SCI patients, but had no effect on spasticity. Further investigation of the effect of ES on spasticity in SCI is needed.
本研究为一项荟萃分析的系统评价。
评估电刺激(ES)对脊髓损伤(SCI)患者骨骼肌体积和痉挛的影响。
巴西巴西利亚大学
检索Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、CINAHL、PEDro、PsycINFO和EMBASE电子数据库,查找截至2018年6月发表的相关文章。对发表年份无限制。纳入标准为涉及成年SCI患者的随机对照试验,比较ES与主动或被动对照。两名独立评审员从所选研究中提取数据,并使用PEDro量表评估方法学质量。
初步检索共检索到164项研究,其中7项符合纳入标准,但只有6项纳入荟萃分析。这6项研究包括104例完全或不完全SCI患者。在两项研究下肢肌肉体积使用ES的研究中,急性SCI患者的总体效果具有统计学意义(平均差异:0.86;95%CI:0.04至1.69;p < 0.04)。在四项研究下肢痉挛使用ES的研究中,总体效果不显著(平均差异:0.55;95%CI:-0.31至1.41;p = 0.21)。
电刺激被发现是增加SCI患者肌肉体积的有效方法,但对痉挛无影响。需要进一步研究ES对SCI患者痉挛的影响。