Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of stomatology, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan City, Hebei Province, China.
Department of stomatology, Affiliated hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde City, Hebei Province, China.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2020 Nov;108(8):3402-3412. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34675. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
Various bone substitutes have been applied in sinus augmentation (SA) to overcome insufficient bone height at the posterior maxilla region caused by pneumatized sinus and severe alveolar bone resorption after teeth loss. However, their effectiveness in SA needs to be further elucidated. In this study, strontium-doped brushite (Sr-DCPD), a new bone substitute, together with bovine-derived hydroxyapatite (bHA) and synthetic hydroxyapatite (sHA) was used in rabbit maxillary SA with simultaneous implant installation. The sinus space-keeping capacity, resorption rate, osteoconductivity, and mechanical properties of regenerated bone, were evaluated by micro-computed tomography (CT), histological analysis, and mechanical testing. Sr-DCPD exhibited the best osteoconductivity and new bone formation (<4 weeks), but its final bone regeneration and removal torque of implants at week 12 were the lowest, mainly due to its poor space-keeping capacity and fast resorption. bHA exhibited the best space-keeping capacity and slowest resorption rate, but relative lower final bone volume and mechanical properties, while sHA showed good space-keeping capacity, slower resorption rate, and the best final bone formation and mechanical properties. sHA was most effective for SA and bHA was also an acceptable bone substitute; however, Sr-DCPD was least effective and not suitable in SA by itself.
各种骨替代物已应用于鼻窦提升术(SA)中,以克服因鼻窦充气和牙齿缺失后严重的牙槽骨吸收而导致的上颌后区骨量不足的问题。然而,它们在 SA 中的有效性需要进一步阐明。在这项研究中,新型骨替代物锶掺杂磷酸二氢钙(Sr-DCPD)与牛来源的羟磷灰石(bHA)和合成羟磷灰石(sHA)一起用于兔上颌骨 SA 并同期植入。通过微计算机断层扫描(CT)、组织学分析和机械测试评估再生骨的窦腔保持能力、吸收速率、骨引导性和机械性能。Sr-DCPD 表现出最好的骨引导性和新骨形成(<4 周),但其最终的骨再生和植入物的去除扭矩在第 12 周时最低,主要是由于其保持空间的能力差和吸收速度快。bHA 表现出最好的保持空间的能力和最慢的吸收速率,但相对较低的最终骨体积和机械性能,而 sHA 表现出良好的保持空间的能力、较慢的吸收速率以及最佳的最终骨形成和机械性能。sHA 是最有效的 SA 治疗方法,bHA 也是一种可接受的骨替代物;然而,Sr-DCPD 本身在 SA 中效果最差且不适用。