Department of Periodontology and Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liege, Belgium.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):393-402. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2332.
Subsinus bone regeneration procedures are reliable and known to be effective with the use of biomaterials alone. Nevertheless, many types of biomaterials are available, and the efficacy of each in terms of bone formation and resorption rate has rarely been compared. This study aimed to compare bone formation, resorption rate, osteoconductivity, and three-dimensional volume changes of three biomaterials often used for alveolar ridge augmentation.
Rabbits underwent bilateral sinus elevation using three different types of space fillers: bovine hydroxyapatite (BHA), beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), or biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP). Animals were sacrificed at 1 week, 5 weeks, and 6 months. Samples were subjected to microcomputed tomography and histologic examination. Qualitative analysis was performed on nondecalcified sections, and quantitative histomorphometric analysis was conducted using scanning electron microscopy. Volume differences in augmented bone were calculated at different time points.
All three particulated biomaterials promoted osteogenesis in this particular animal model. At 6 months, biomaterial resorption rates were significantly different across the three groups. The highest resorption rate was found with β-TCP, in which only 6.7% of the baseline particle surface remained. At 6 months, bone was in close contact with the BHA particles, constituting a composite network; in contrast, BCP particles were often surrounded by soft tissue. Within each group, no significant differences in volume were found at the different time points.
Despite the limitations of the study, the three studied biomaterials proved to be effective in promoting osteogenesis. High resorption rates and complete replacement of the biomaterials by bone seemed to withstand intrasinusal pressure. Further investigations in humans should consider longer follow-up periods.
单独使用生物材料进行鼻窦下骨再生程序是可靠且有效的。然而,有许多类型的生物材料可供选择,并且每种材料在骨形成和吸收率方面的效果很少被比较。本研究旨在比较三种常用于牙槽嵴增高的生物材料的骨形成、吸收率、骨传导性和三维体积变化。
兔子接受了三种不同类型的空间填充物的双侧窦提升:牛羟磷灰石(BHA)、β-磷酸三钙(β-TCP)或双相磷酸钙(BCP)。动物在 1 周、5 周和 6 个月时被处死。样本进行了微计算机断层扫描和组织学检查。对非脱钙切片进行了定性分析,并使用扫描电子显微镜进行了定量组织形态计量学分析。在不同时间点计算了增强骨的体积差异。
所有三种颗粒状生物材料都在这个特定的动物模型中促进了成骨作用。6 个月时,三组间生物材料的吸收率有显著差异。β-TCP 的吸收率最高,其中只有 6.7%的基础颗粒表面仍然存在。6 个月时,BHA 颗粒与骨紧密接触,构成复合网络;相比之下,BCP 颗粒经常被软组织包围。在每个组内,不同时间点的体积没有显著差异。
尽管研究存在局限性,但所研究的三种生物材料在促进成骨方面均有效。高吸收率和生物材料完全被骨取代似乎能承受鼻窦内的压力。在人类中的进一步研究应考虑更长的随访时间。