Mirakhur R K
Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast.
Anaesthesia. 1988 Jul;43(7):593-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb06699.x.
The induction characteristics of propofol were studied and compared with thiopentone in children aged 3-14 years who received either no premedication or pethidine-atropine or trimeprazine. Anaesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide in oxygen, and isoflurane. The induction doses of propofol and thiopentone were 2.9 mg/kg and 6.5-7.1 mg/kg respectively; premedication had no significant effect on the induction doses of either agent. Spontaneous movement and hypertonus occurred in about 20% of children with both agents. The use of propofol was associated with a high incidence of pain on injection (injections were mostly in veins on the dorsum of the hand), but this was reduced by mixing lignocaine with propofol. Cardiovascular effects were not clinically significant with either agent. Apnoea occurred in 35% of patients given propofol and in 50% of those given thiopentone. Children anaesthetised with propofol awoke significantly earlier after cessation of all anaesthesia. It is concluded that the use of propofol is safe in children and may have advantages where early recovery from anaesthesia is desirable, but offers no advantage over thiopentone for routine induction of anaesthesia.
对3至14岁未使用术前用药、使用哌替啶 - 阿托品或异丙嗪的儿童,研究了丙泊酚的诱导特性,并与硫喷妥钠进行比较。麻醉维持采用氧化亚氮和氧气以及异氟烷。丙泊酚和硫喷妥钠的诱导剂量分别为2.9毫克/千克和6.5 - 7.1毫克/千克;术前用药对两种药物的诱导剂量均无显著影响。两种药物在约20%的儿童中出现自发运动和肌张力亢进。丙泊酚的使用与注射时疼痛的高发生率相关(注射大多在手背部静脉),但将利多卡因与丙泊酚混合可减轻疼痛。两种药物的心血管效应在临床上均不显著。接受丙泊酚的患者中有35%发生呼吸暂停,接受硫喷妥钠的患者中有50%发生呼吸暂停。使用丙泊酚麻醉的儿童在所有麻醉停止后苏醒明显更早。结论是,丙泊酚在儿童中使用是安全的,在希望早期从麻醉中恢复的情况下可能具有优势,但在常规麻醉诱导方面并不比硫喷妥钠有优势。