Valtonen M, Iisalo E, Kanto J, Tikkanen J
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Turku, Finland.
Anaesthesia. 1988 Aug;43(8):696-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb04162.x.
Propofol 2.5 mg/kg was compared with thiopentone 5 mg/kg in a randomised open study, as an induction agent in paediatric anaesthesia. One hundred and twenty children who were to undergo elective surgery were included in the study. Both propofol and thiopentone produced a rapid and smooth induction with a low incidence of side effects. A similar decrease (10%) in mean arterial pressure was observed with both agents, but propofol showed better suppression of the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. Respiratory upsets occurred less frequently with propofol than with thiopentone, but propofol frequently induced discomfort on injection. Both agents provided satisfactory and controllable induction of anesthesia and no major adverse reactions occurred during or after anaesthesia. We conclude that propofol is a useful alternative as an induction agent in children.
在一项随机开放研究中,将2.5毫克/千克的丙泊酚与5毫克/千克的硫喷妥钠作为小儿麻醉诱导剂进行了比较。该研究纳入了120名计划接受择期手术的儿童。丙泊酚和硫喷妥钠均能产生快速、平稳的诱导效果,且副作用发生率较低。两种药物均观察到平均动脉压有相似程度的下降(10%),但丙泊酚对气管插管的血流动力学反应抑制效果更好。与硫喷妥钠相比,丙泊酚引起呼吸不适的频率较低,但丙泊酚在注射时常引起不适。两种药物均能提供满意且可控的麻醉诱导,麻醉期间及麻醉后均未发生重大不良反应。我们得出结论,丙泊酚作为儿童麻醉诱导剂是一种有用的替代药物。