• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放合成与 2020 年的冠状病毒大流行。

Open synthesis and the coronavirus pandemic in 2020.

机构信息

Stockholm Environment Institute, Linnégatan 87D, Stockholm, Sweden; African Centre for Evidence, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa; The SEI Centre of the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence, Stockholm, Sweden; Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HE&I), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; The Global Evidence Synthesis Initiative (GESI) Secretariat, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;126:184-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.032. Epub 2020 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.032
PMID:32621854
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7328560/
Abstract

• Open Science principles are vital for ensuring reproducibility, trust, and legacy. • Evidence synthesis is a vital means of summarizing research for decision-making. • Open Synthesis is the application of Open Science principles to evidence synthesis. • Open approaches to planning, conducting, and reporting synthesis have many benefits. • We call on the evidence synthesis community to embrace Open Synthesis.

摘要

• 开放科学原则对于确保可重复性、信任和传承至关重要。 • 证据综合是为决策总结研究的重要手段。 • 开放综合是将开放科学原则应用于证据综合。 • 开放的综合规划、实施和报告方法有许多好处。 • 我们呼吁证据综合界接受开放综合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff18/7328560/1d410efaa98a/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff18/7328560/bac1249085af/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff18/7328560/1d410efaa98a/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff18/7328560/bac1249085af/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff18/7328560/1d410efaa98a/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Open synthesis and the coronavirus pandemic in 2020.开放合成与 2020 年的冠状病毒大流行。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;126:184-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.032. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
2
Rapid review methods more challenging during COVID-19: commentary with a focus on 8 knowledge synthesis steps.在新冠疫情期间快速回顾方法更具挑战性:聚焦8个知识综合步骤的评论
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;126:177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.029. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
3
Critical Review of the Literature on Chest CT and Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Data Adjustment.胸部CT与冠状病毒病(COVID-19)文献的批判性综述:数据调整
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Aug;215(2):W27. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23435. Epub 2020 May 29.
4
Reply to "Critical Review of the Literature on Chest CT and Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Data Adjustment".对《胸部CT与冠状病毒病(COVID-19)文献的批判性综述:数据调整》的回复
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Aug;215(2):W28. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23564. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
5
Methodological challenges in studying the COVID-19 pandemic crisis.研究新冠疫情危机中的方法学挑战。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 May;121:A5-A7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.04.001.
6
Orchestrating Collaborative Research and Clinical Trials during COVID-19 Pandemic - A New Normal.在新冠疫情期间协调合作研究与临床试验——一种新常态
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2020 Nov 16;28(8):1163-1165. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2020.1815800. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
7
Covid-19: research methods must be flexible in a crisis.新冠疫情:危机时刻研究方法必须灵活多变。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 6;370:m2668. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2668.
8
[COVID-19-never waste a crisis?!].[新冠疫情——切莫浪费一场危机?!]
Radiologe. 2020 Oct;60(10):891-892. doi: 10.1007/s00117-020-00750-x.
9
Generating randomized trial evidence to optimize treatment in the COVID-19 pandemic.生成随机试验证据以优化新冠疫情中的治疗。
CMAJ. 2020 Apr 14;192(15):E405-E407. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200438. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
10
Avoidable Waste of Research on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)研究中的可避免浪费
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul;136(1):191. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003978.

引用本文的文献

1
Eccentric-Only Versus Concentric-Only Isokinetic Strength Training Effects on Maximal Voluntary Eccentric, Concentric and Isometric Contraction Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.仅离心收缩与仅向心收缩等速力量训练对最大自主离心、向心和等长收缩力量的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Sports Med Open. 2025 Aug 21;11(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s40798-025-00887-w.
2
Methods for conducting a living evidence profile on mpox: An evidence map of the literature.开展猴痘生存证据概况的方法:文献证据图谱
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Feb 22;2(2):e12044. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12044. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Coronavirus disease 2019 scenarios for a long-term strategy under fundamental uncertainty.

本文引用的文献

1
Campbell systematic reviews takes next step to meeting FAIR principles.坎贝尔系统评价向符合FAIR原则迈出了下一步。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 5;15(1-2):e1032. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1032. eCollection 2019 Jun.
2
Using GRADE in situations of emergencies and urgencies: certainty in evidence and recommendations matters during the COVID-19 pandemic, now more than ever and no matter what.在紧急情况下使用 GRADE:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,现在比以往任何时候都更重要,无论如何,证据和建议的确定性至关重要。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;127:202-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.030. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
3
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review of Imaging Findings in 919 Patients.
2019 年冠状病毒病长期战略基本不确定情景。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Aug;148:196-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.02.012. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
4
Feasibility study for interactive reporting of network meta-analysis: experiences from the development of the MetaInsight COVID-19 app for stakeholder exploration, re-analysis and sensitivity analysis from living systematic reviews.网络荟萃分析交互式报告的可行性研究:来自 MetaInsight COVID-19 应用程序开发的经验,该应用程序用于从正在进行的系统评价中探索利益相关者、重新分析和敏感性分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jan 22;22(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01507-x.
5
Challenges of evidence synthesis during the 2020 COVID pandemic: a scoping review.2020 年 COVID 大流行期间证据综合的挑战:范围综述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;142:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.10.017. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
6
Methodological assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on COVID-19: A meta-epidemiological study.方法学评估系统评价和荟萃分析 COVID-19:一项荟萃流行病学研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;27(5):1123-1133. doi: 10.1111/jep.13578. Epub 2021 May 5.
7
Access to data from clinical trials in the COVID-19 crisis: open, flexible, and time-sensitive.在新冠疫情危机中获取临床试验数据:开放、灵活且具有时间敏感性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:143-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19):919 例患者影像学表现的系统评价。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jul;215(1):87-93. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23034. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
4
Future of Evidence Ecosystem Series: Evidence synthesis 2.0: when systematic, scoping, rapid, living, and overviews of reviews come together.证据生态系统系列的未来:证据综合2.0:当系统评价、范围综述、快速综述、实时综述和综述概述相结合时。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:162-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.025. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
5
Sharing data-taming the beast: barriers to meta-analyses of individual patient data (IPD) and solutions.共享数据——驯服这头野兽:个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析的障碍与解决方案
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;54(14):822-824. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101892. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
6
Pathways to independence: towards producing and using trustworthy evidence.通向独立之路:迈向生成和使用可靠证据
BMJ. 2019 Dec 3;367:l6576. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6576.
7
Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond.开放科学在职业生涯早期及以后面临的挑战、获益和技巧。
PLoS Biol. 2019 May 1;17(5):e3000246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000246. eCollection 2019 May.
8
Reporting of Financial and Non-financial Conflicts of Interest in Systematic Reviews on Health Policy and Systems Research: A Cross Sectional Survey.系统评价中卫生政策和体系研究的财务和非财务利益冲突报告:一项横断面调查。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Aug 1;7(8):711-717. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.146.
9
Why Cochrane should prioritise sharing data.为什么考科蓝协作网应优先考虑共享数据。
BMJ. 2018 Jul 30;362:k3229. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3229.
10
The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles.开放获取(OA)的现状:对开放获取文章的患病率和影响的大规模分析。
PeerJ. 2018 Feb 13;6:e4375. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4375. eCollection 2018.