• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2020 年 COVID 大流行期间证据综合的挑战:范围综述。

Challenges of evidence synthesis during the 2020 COVID pandemic: a scoping review.

机构信息

School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;142:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.10.017. Epub 2021 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.10.017
PMID:34718121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8550900/
Abstract

AIM

The objectives of this scoping review are to identify the challenges to conducting evidence synthesis during the COVID-19 pandemic and to propose some recommendations addressing the identified gaps.

METHODS

A scoping review methodology was followed to map the literature published on the challenges and solutions of conducting evidence synthesis using the Joanna Briggs Methodology of performing scoping review. We searched several databases from the start of the Pandemic in December 2019 until 10th June 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 28 publications was included in the review. The challenges cited in the included studies have been categorised into four distinct but interconnected themes including: upstream, Evidence synthesis, downstream and contextual challenges. These challenges have been further refined into issues with primary studies, databases, team capacity, process, resources, and context. Several proposals to improve the above challenges included: transparency in primary studies registration and reporting, establishment of online platforms that enables collaboration, data sharing and searching, the use of computable evidence and coordination of efforts at an international level.

CONCLUSION

This review has highlighted the importance of including artificial intelligence, a framework for international collaboration and a sustained funding model to address many of the shortcomings and ensure we are ready for similar challenges in the future.

摘要

目的

本范围综述的目的是确定在 COVID-19 大流行期间进行证据综合所面临的挑战,并针对已确定的差距提出一些建议。

方法

采用 Joanna Briggs 循证卫生保健中心实施范围综述的方法,对 2019 年 12 月大流行开始至 2021 年 6 月 10 日期间发表的关于进行证据综合的挑战和解决方案的文献进行了综述。

结果

综述共纳入 28 篇文献。纳入研究中提到的挑战分为四个截然不同但相互关联的主题,包括:上游、证据综合、下游和背景挑战。这些挑战进一步细分为原始研究、数据库、团队能力、过程、资源和背景方面的问题。为改善上述挑战提出了一些建议,包括:原始研究注册和报告的透明度、建立能够促进合作、数据共享和搜索的在线平台、使用可计算证据以及在国际层面协调努力。

结论

本综述强调了纳入人工智能、国际合作框架和持续供资模式的重要性,以解决许多不足之处,并确保我们为未来类似的挑战做好准备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41c/8550900/cfe93b4c04d2/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41c/8550900/f15f080c1d29/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41c/8550900/cfe93b4c04d2/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41c/8550900/f15f080c1d29/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41c/8550900/cfe93b4c04d2/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Challenges of evidence synthesis during the 2020 COVID pandemic: a scoping review.2020 年 COVID 大流行期间证据综合的挑战:范围综述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;142:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.10.017. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
2
A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews.一项关于范围综述的开展与报告的范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Feb 9;16:15. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Patient Organizations' Digital Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.患者组织对 COVID-19 大流行的数字化应对措施:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 20;26:e58566. doi: 10.2196/58566.
8
Practical nursing recommendations for palliative care for people with dementia living in long-term care facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid scoping review.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对长期护理机构中患有痴呆症的人的姑息治疗的实用护理建议:快速范围审查。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jan;113:103781. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103781. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
9
Towards achieving interorganisational collaboration between health-care providers: a realist evidence synthesis.实现医疗机构间合作的途径:一项基于实际证据的系统综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(6):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KPLT1423.
10
Policy options to address the effectiveness of health service management graduates in solving Iranian health system challenges: a mixed scoping review and policy Delphi approach.应对卫生服务管理专业毕业生解决伊朗卫生系统挑战有效性的政策选择:混合式范围综述与政策德尔菲法
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Oct 5;77:102875. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102875. eCollection 2024 Nov.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of public health and social measures (PHSM) implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic: An overview of systematic reviews.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间实施的公共卫生和社会措施的效果:系统评价概述
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Apr 29;2(5):e12055. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12055. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Observational research in epidemic settings: a roadmap to reform.疫情背景下的观察性研究:改革路线图。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Feb 10;10(2):e017981. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017981.
3
Addressing evidence needs during health crises in the province of Quebec (Canada): a proposed action plan for rapid evidence synthesis.

本文引用的文献

1
Using preprints in evidence synthesis: Commentary on experience during the COVID-19 pandemic.在证据综合中使用预印本:关于COVID-19大流行期间经验的评论
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;138:203-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 May 19.
2
Evidence synthesis in the time of COVID-19.新冠疫情时期的证据综合分析
Climacteric. 2021 Jun;24(3):211-213. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2021.1904676.
3
A Scientometric Approach to Review the Role of the Medial Preoptic Area (MPOA) in Parental Behavior.一种科学计量学方法用于综述内侧视前区(MPOA)在亲代行为中的作用
应对加拿大魁北克省健康危机期间的证据需求:快速证据综合的拟议行动计划。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 11;25(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12204-y.
4
Leveraging new methodologies for public health crisis management.利用公共卫生危机管理的新方法。
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 20;12:1508417. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1508417. eCollection 2024.
5
Uncertainty in COVID-19 transmission could undermine our ability to predict long COVID.新冠病毒传播的不确定性可能会削弱我们预测长期新冠的能力。
J R Soc Interface. 2024 Dec;21(221):20240438. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0438. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
6
Production and use of rapid responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec (Canada): perspectives from evidence synthesis producers and decision makers.魁北克(加拿大)在 COVID-19 大流行期间快速反应的制定与应用:来自证据综合制定者和决策者的观点。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Feb 13;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01105-x.
7
Overcoming the challenges of using automated technologies for public health evidence synthesis.克服使用自动化技术进行公共卫生证据综合的挑战。
Euro Surveill. 2023 Nov;28(45). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.45.2300183.
8
Structural under-reporting of informed consent, data handling and sharing, ethical approval, and application of Open Science principles as proxies for study quality conduct in COVID-19 research: a systematic scoping review.结构信息缺失,包括知情同意、数据处理和共享、伦理审批,以及开放科学原则在 COVID-19 研究中作为研究质量行为的替代指标:系统范围审查。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 May;8(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012007.
9
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different- the "Big Picture" review family.绘制文献综述、范围综述和证据与差距图(EGM):同而不同——“大图景”综述家族。
Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 15;12(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02178-5.
10
Systematic reviews of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 continue to be poorly conducted and reported: a systematic review.COVID-19 恢复期血浆的系统评价继续存在方法学和报告质量差的问题:一项系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;151:53-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
Brain Sci. 2021 Mar 20;11(3):393. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11030393.
4
A metaresearch study revealed susceptibility of Covid-19 treatment research to white hat bias: first, do no harm.一项元研究表明,Covid-19 治疗研究容易受到白帽偏差的影响:首先,不要造成伤害。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;136:55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.020. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
5
Lessons for the global primary care response to COVID-19: a rapid review of evidence from past epidemics.全球初级保健应对 COVID-19 的经验教训:对以往疫情证据的快速审查。
Fam Pract. 2021 Nov 24;38(6):811-825. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa142.
6
Coronavirus Disease-19: An Interim Evidence Synthesis of the World Association for Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (Waidid).冠状病毒病-19:世界传染病与免疫紊乱协会(Waidid)的临时证据综合报告
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Oct 30;7:572485. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.572485. eCollection 2020.
7
LitCovid: an open database of COVID-19 literature.LitCovid:一个 COVID-19 文献的开放数据库。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 8;49(D1):D1534-D1540. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa952.
8
A QuESt for speed: rapid qualitative evidence syntheses as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic.快速定性证据综合:应对 COVID-19 大流行的快速反应。
Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 4;9(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01512-5.
9
Access to data from clinical trials in the COVID-19 crisis: open, flexible, and time-sensitive.在新冠疫情危机中获取临床试验数据:开放、灵活且具有时间敏感性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:143-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
10
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper.作为紧急响应的一部分制定可信推荐(1-2 周):一个 GRADE 概念文件。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.037. Epub 2020 Sep 30.