• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2019 年冠状病毒病长期战略基本不确定情景。

Coronavirus disease 2019 scenarios for a long-term strategy under fundamental uncertainty.

机构信息

Scientific Council for Government Policy (WRR) and Professor of Normative Aspects of Scientific Policy Advice at Utrecht University, The Hague, The Netherlands.

Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy (WRR) The Hague, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Aug;148:196-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.02.012. Epub 2022 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.02.012
PMID:35219803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8873039/
Abstract

Early on, scientists have pointed out that coronavirus disease 2019 is most likely here to stay, although its course and development are uncertain. This requires a long-term strategy of living with the virus. However, the urgency of new waves of infection and the emergence of new variants have invoked an approach of acute crisis management over and over, hindering the design of a structural approach for the long term. Exploratory scenarios can provide scientific strategic guidance to policy processes to be better prepared in this situation of fundamental uncertainty. We have therefore developed five scenarios, which describe the possible long-term development of the pandemic from an epidemiological, virological, and broader societal perspective. These scenarios are based on four driving forces that are both important and uncertain: immunity, vaccination, mutations, and human behavior. The scenarios are (1) return to normal, (2) flu+, (3) external threat, (4) continuous struggle, and (5) worst case. Working with scenarios is crucial for appropriate public communication and provides guidance for anticipating the various conceivable possibilities for the further course of the pandemic.

摘要

早期,科学家们就指出,尽管 2019 年冠状病毒病的进程和发展仍不确定,但这种疾病很可能会长期存在。这就需要制定长期与病毒共存的策略。然而,新一波感染的紧迫性和新变体的出现一次又一次地引发了急性危机管理方法,阻碍了长期结构性方法的设计。探索性情景可以为政策制定过程提供科学的战略指导,以在这种基本不确定的情况下做好更好的准备。因此,我们从流行病学、病毒学和更广泛的社会角度出发,制定了五个情景,描述了大流行可能的长期发展。这些情景基于四个既重要又不确定的驱动因素:免疫力、疫苗接种、突变和人类行为。这些情景是:(1)回归正常,(2)流感+,(3)外部威胁,(4)持续斗争,以及(5)最坏情况。运用情景对适当的公众沟通至关重要,并为预测大流行的进一步发展提供了各种可能情况的指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7234/8873039/3a0a13538442/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7234/8873039/3a0a13538442/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7234/8873039/3a0a13538442/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Coronavirus disease 2019 scenarios for a long-term strategy under fundamental uncertainty.2019 年冠状病毒病长期战略基本不确定情景。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Aug;148:196-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.02.012. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
2
Communicating scientific uncertainty in a rapidly evolving situation: a framing analysis of Canadian coverage in early days of COVID-19.在快速变化的情况下传达科学不确定性:对 COVID-19 早期加拿大报道的框架分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 29;21(1):2181. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12246-x.
3
Return-to-work, disabilities and occupational health in the age of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代的重返工作岗位、残疾与职业健康。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Jul 1;47(5):408-409. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3960. Epub 2021 May 18.
4
Sound Decision Making in Uncertain Times: Can Systems Modelling Be Useful for Informing Policy and Planning for Suicide Prevention?不确定时期的明智决策:系统建模能否有助于为自杀预防政策和规划提供信息?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;19(3):1468. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031468.
5
Perspectives on Oncology-Specific Language During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.《COVID-19 大流行期间肿瘤学专业术语的使用观点:一项定性研究》。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;6(9):1424-1428. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2980.
6
Communicating Scientific Uncertainty About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Online Experimental Study of an Uncertainty-Normalizing Strategy.关于 COVID-19 大流行的科学不确定性的沟通:一种不确定性规范化策略的在线实验研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 22;23(4):e27832. doi: 10.2196/27832.
7
[Health professionals facing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: What are the mental health risks?].面对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的卫生专业人员:心理健康风险有哪些?
Encephale. 2020 Jun;46(3S):S73-S80. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
8
Best Practices for COVID-19 Mass Vaccination Clinics.新冠病毒大规模疫苗接种诊所的最佳实践。
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Mar-Apr;20(2):149-156. doi: 10.1370/afm.2773.
9
Are we prepared for the next influenza pandemic? Lessons from modelling different preparedness policies against four pandemic scenarios.我们是否为下一次流感大流行做好了准备?从针对四种大流行情景的不同准备政策模型中吸取的教训。
J Theor Biol. 2019 Nov 21;481:223-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 4.
10
From "getting things right" to "getting things right now": Developing COVID-19 guidance under time pressure and knowledge uncertainty.从“把事情做对”到“现在就把事情做对”:在时间压力和知识不确定性下制定 COVID-19 指南。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Feb;28(1):49-56. doi: 10.1111/jep.13625. Epub 2021 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasensitive and fast detection of SARS-CoV-2 using RT-LAMP without pH-dependent dye.使用 RT-LAMP 进行无 pH 依赖性染料的 SARS-CoV-2 的超灵敏和快速检测。
Funct Integr Genomics. 2024 Jan 20;24(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s10142-024-01297-z.
2
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the conduct of non-COVID-19 clinical trials: protocol for a scoping review.COVID-19 大流行对非 COVID-19 临床试验开展的影响:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 10;13(10):e074128. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074128.
3
Editors' Choice: August 2022.编辑推荐:2022年8月。

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the effects of Covid-19 through a life course lens.从生命历程的角度理解新冠疫情的影响。
Adv Life Course Res. 2020 Sep;45:100360. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100360. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
2
Scientists see a 'really, really tough winter' with Omicron.科学家们认为,随着奥密克戎毒株的出现,将会迎来一个“极其艰难的冬天”。
Science. 2021 Dec 17;374(6574):1421-1422. doi: 10.1126/science.acz9834. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
3
A worldwide assessment of changes in adherence to COVID-19 protective behaviours and hypothesized pandemic fatigue.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Aug;148:A1-A2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.08.011.
4
Health Beliefs and Socioeconomic Determinants of COVID-19 Booster Vaccine Acceptance: An Indonesian Cross-Sectional Study.新冠病毒加强疫苗接种的健康信念与社会经济决定因素:一项印度尼西亚横断面研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 May 5;10(5):724. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10050724.
一项针对 COVID-19 防护行为依从性变化和假设的大流行疲劳的全球评估。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Sep;5(9):1145-1160. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01181-x. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
4
New placebo-controlled Covid-19 vaccine trials are ethically questionable; it's now about comparative effectiveness and availability of registered vaccines.新的新冠病毒疫苗安慰剂对照试验在伦理上存在问题;现在的重点是已注册疫苗的相对有效性和可及性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 May;133:175-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
5
"NEVER LET A CRISIS GO TO WASTE": HOW SCIENCE HAS RESPONDED TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.“绝不让危机被浪费”:科学如何应对新冠疫情。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Mar;131:A5-A6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.001.
6
Five reasons why COVID herd immunity is probably impossible.新冠病毒群体免疫可能无法实现的五个原因。
Nature. 2021 Mar;591(7851):520-522. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-00728-2.
7
The coronavirus is here to stay - here's what that means.新冠病毒将长期存在——以下是这意味着什么。
Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7846):382-384. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-00396-2.
8
Pandemic fatigue? How adherence to covid-19 regulations has been misrepresented and why it matters.大流行疲劳?新冠疫情防控规定的遵守情况是如何被歪曲的以及为何这很重要。
BMJ. 2021 Jan 18;372:n137. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n137.
9
Coevolution of policy and science during the pandemic.疫情期间政策与科学的共同演变。
Science. 2021 Jan 8;371(6525):128-130. doi: 10.1126/science.abe3084.
10
Evidence-based medicine in times of crisis.危机时刻的循证医学
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;126:164-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 10.