Suppr超能文献

支气管镜检查学习曲线的发展:一项多中心肺科培训医师研究的结果。

Development of Learning Curves for Bronchoscopy: Results of a Multicenter Study of Pulmonary Trainees.

机构信息

Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Chest. 2020 Dec;158(6):2485-2492. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.046. Epub 2020 Jul 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are currently no reference standards for the development of competence in bronchoscopy.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The aims of this study were to (1) develop learning curves for bronchoscopy skill development and (2) estimate the number of bronchoscopies required to achieve competence.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Trainees from seven North American academic centers were enrolled at the beginning of their pulmonology training. Performance during clinical bronchoscopies was assessed by supervising physicians using the Ontario Bronchoscopy Assessment Tool (OBAT). Group-level learning curves were modeled using a quantile regression growth model, where the dependent variable was the mean OBAT score and the independent variable was the number of bronchoscopies performed at the time the OBAT was completed.

RESULTS

A total of 591 OBAT assessments were collected from 31 trainees. The estimated regression quantiles illustrate significantly different learning curves based on trainees' performance percentiles. When competence was defined as the mean OBAT score for all bronchoscopies rated as being completed without need for supervision, the mean OBAT score associated with competence was 4.54 (95% CI, 4.47-4.58). Using this metric, the number of bronchoscopies required to achieve this score varied from seven to 10 for the 90th percentile of trainees and from 109 to 126 for the lowest 10th percentile of trainees. When competence was defined as the mean OBAT score for the first independent bronchoscopy, the mean was 4.40 (95% CI, 4.20-4.60). On the basis of this metric, the number of bronchoscopies required varied from one to 11 for the 90th percentile of trainees and from 83 to 129 for the lowest 10th percentile of trainees.

INTERPRETATION

We were able to generate learning curves for bronchoscopy across a range of trainees and centers. Furthermore, we established the average number of bronchoscopies required for the attainment of competence. This information can be used for purposes of curriculum planning and allows a trainee's progress to be compared with an established norm.

摘要

背景

目前尚无支气管镜检查能力发展的参考标准。

研究问题

本研究的目的是:(1)制定支气管镜技术发展的学习曲线;(2)估计达到胜任水平所需的支气管镜检查次数。

研究设计和方法

7 个北美学术中心的学员在开始肺科培训时被纳入研究。通过使用安大略省支气管镜检查评估工具(OBAT),由监督医师评估临床支气管镜检查过程中的表现。使用分位数回归增长模型对组水平学习曲线进行建模,其中因变量是平均 OBAT 评分,自变量是完成 OBAT 时进行的支气管镜检查次数。

结果

共收集了 31 名学员的 591 次 OBAT 评估。估计的回归分位数表明,根据学员的表现百分位数,学习曲线显著不同。当胜任力被定义为所有被评为无需监督即可完成的支气管镜检查的平均 OBAT 评分时,与胜任力相关的平均 OBAT 评分为 4.54(95%CI,4.47-4.58)。使用此指标,第 90 百分位的学员需要进行 7-10 次支气管镜检查,第 10 百分位的学员需要进行 109-126 次支气管镜检查,才能达到这一分数。当胜任力被定义为首次独立支气管镜检查的平均 OBAT 评分时,平均得分为 4.40(95%CI,4.20-4.60)。根据这一指标,第 90 百分位的学员需要进行 1-11 次支气管镜检查,第 10 百分位的学员需要进行 83-129 次支气管镜检查,才能达到这一分数。

解释

我们能够为一系列学员和中心生成支气管镜检查的学习曲线。此外,我们确定了达到胜任水平所需的平均支气管镜检查次数。这些信息可用于课程规划,并允许将学员的进展与既定标准进行比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验