Suppr超能文献

学员基本硬式支气管镜学习曲线的变化。

Variable Learning Curve of Basic Rigid Bronchoscopy in Trainees.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Respiration. 2021;100(6):530-537. doi: 10.1159/000514627. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite increased use of rigid bronchoscopy (RB) for therapeutic indications and recommendations from professional societies to use performance-based competency, an assessment tool has not been utilized to measure the competency of trainees to perform RB in clinical settings.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate a previously developed assessment tool - Rigid Bronchoscopy Tool for Assessment of Skills and Competence (RIGID-TASC) - for determining the RB learning curve of interventional pulmonary (IP) trainees in the clinical setting and explore the variability of learning curve of trainees.

METHODS

IP fellows at 4 institutions were enrolled. After preclinical simulation training, all RBs performed in patients were scored by faculty using RIGID-TASC until competency threshold was achieved. Competency threshold was defined as unassisted RB intubation and navigation through the central airways on 3 consecutive patients at the first attempt with a minimum score of 89. A regression-based model was devised to construct and compare the learning curves.

RESULTS

Twelve IP fellows performed 178 RBs. Trainees reached the competency threshold between 5 and 24 RBs, with a median of 15 RBs (95% CI, 6-21). There were differences among trainees in learning curve parameters including starting point, slope, and inflection point, as demonstrated by the curve-fitting model. Subtasks that required the highest number of procedures (median = 10) to gain competency included ability to intubate at the first attempt and intubation time of <60 s.

CONCLUSIONS

Trainees acquire RB skills at a variable pace, and RIGID-TASC can be used to assess learning curve of IP trainees in clinical settings.

摘要

背景

尽管越来越多地将硬性支气管镜(RB)用于治疗适应证,并且专业协会也建议采用基于绩效的能力标准,但尚未使用评估工具来衡量受训者在临床环境中进行 RB 的能力。

目的

本研究旨在评估先前开发的评估工具 - 硬性支气管镜技能和能力评估工具(RIGID-TASC) - ,以确定介入性肺病(IP)受训者在临床环境中的 RB 学习曲线,并探讨受训者学习曲线的可变性。

方法

4 个机构的 IP 研究员被纳入研究。在临床前模拟培训之后,教员使用 RIGID-TASC 对所有在患者中进行的 RB 进行评分,直到达到能力阈值。能力阈值定义为首次尝试时在 3 名连续患者中无需辅助即可进行 RB 插管并穿过中央气道,且最低得分为 89 分。设计了基于回归的模型来构建和比较学习曲线。

结果

12 名 IP 研究员共进行了 178 次 RB。受训者在 5 至 24 次 RB 之间达到能力阈值,中位数为 15 次 RB(95%CI,6-21)。正如曲线拟合模型所示,受训者在学习曲线参数方面存在差异,包括起点、斜率和拐点。需要完成最多程序(中位数= 10)才能获得能力的子任务包括首次尝试插管的能力和插管时间<60 秒。

结论

受训者以不同的速度获得 RB 技能,RIGID-TASC 可用于评估临床环境中 IP 受训者的学习曲线。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验