Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Respiration. 2021;100(6):530-537. doi: 10.1159/000514627. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
Despite increased use of rigid bronchoscopy (RB) for therapeutic indications and recommendations from professional societies to use performance-based competency, an assessment tool has not been utilized to measure the competency of trainees to perform RB in clinical settings.
The aim of the study was to evaluate a previously developed assessment tool - Rigid Bronchoscopy Tool for Assessment of Skills and Competence (RIGID-TASC) - for determining the RB learning curve of interventional pulmonary (IP) trainees in the clinical setting and explore the variability of learning curve of trainees.
IP fellows at 4 institutions were enrolled. After preclinical simulation training, all RBs performed in patients were scored by faculty using RIGID-TASC until competency threshold was achieved. Competency threshold was defined as unassisted RB intubation and navigation through the central airways on 3 consecutive patients at the first attempt with a minimum score of 89. A regression-based model was devised to construct and compare the learning curves.
Twelve IP fellows performed 178 RBs. Trainees reached the competency threshold between 5 and 24 RBs, with a median of 15 RBs (95% CI, 6-21). There were differences among trainees in learning curve parameters including starting point, slope, and inflection point, as demonstrated by the curve-fitting model. Subtasks that required the highest number of procedures (median = 10) to gain competency included ability to intubate at the first attempt and intubation time of <60 s.
Trainees acquire RB skills at a variable pace, and RIGID-TASC can be used to assess learning curve of IP trainees in clinical settings.
尽管越来越多地将硬性支气管镜(RB)用于治疗适应证,并且专业协会也建议采用基于绩效的能力标准,但尚未使用评估工具来衡量受训者在临床环境中进行 RB 的能力。
本研究旨在评估先前开发的评估工具 - 硬性支气管镜技能和能力评估工具(RIGID-TASC) - ,以确定介入性肺病(IP)受训者在临床环境中的 RB 学习曲线,并探讨受训者学习曲线的可变性。
4 个机构的 IP 研究员被纳入研究。在临床前模拟培训之后,教员使用 RIGID-TASC 对所有在患者中进行的 RB 进行评分,直到达到能力阈值。能力阈值定义为首次尝试时在 3 名连续患者中无需辅助即可进行 RB 插管并穿过中央气道,且最低得分为 89 分。设计了基于回归的模型来构建和比较学习曲线。
12 名 IP 研究员共进行了 178 次 RB。受训者在 5 至 24 次 RB 之间达到能力阈值,中位数为 15 次 RB(95%CI,6-21)。正如曲线拟合模型所示,受训者在学习曲线参数方面存在差异,包括起点、斜率和拐点。需要完成最多程序(中位数= 10)才能获得能力的子任务包括首次尝试插管的能力和插管时间<60 秒。
受训者以不同的速度获得 RB 技能,RIGID-TASC 可用于评估临床环境中 IP 受训者的学习曲线。