Suppr超能文献

认知障碍程度并不表示早期或晚期轻度认知障碍:基于阿尔茨海默病多基因风险的证实。

Degree of cognitive impairment does not signify early versus late mild cognitive impairment: confirmation based on Alzheimer's disease polygenic risk.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Center for Behavior Genetics of Aging, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Neurobiol Aging. 2020 Oct;94:149-153. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 Jun 11.

Abstract

Degree of memory impairment is often used to infer early versus late amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). Previously, 318 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative participants with aMCI-determined by a single memory test-were divided based on Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task (AVLT) delayed recall: AVLT-impaired (n = 225) and AVLT-normal (n = 93). Equally consistent with differential progression or differential diagnosis, the AVLT-impaired group had more abnormal Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers, more neurodegeneration over time, and was more likely to develop AD. In the present study, higher AD polygenic risk scores were associated with increased odds of being AVLT-impaired (odds ratio 1.8, p < 0.001). Thus, impairment severity does not necessarily reflect early versus late aMCI because disease progression cannot alter polygenic risk. Presumed early MCI is likely a heterogeneous category that includes excess false-positives. The additional cognitive test improved diagnostic precision by reducing false positives. Impairment severity may reflect differences in underlying disease risk but cannot be used to infer early versus late MCI based on cross-sectional data alone.

摘要

记忆损伤程度常被用于推断早发性和晚发性遗忘型轻度认知障碍(aMCI)。此前,318 名经单一记忆测试确诊为 aMCI 的阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议参与者,根据 Rey 听觉言语学习测试(AVLT)的延迟回忆进行分组:AVLT 损伤组(n=225)和 AVLT 正常组(n=93)。同样与进展差异或诊断差异一致的是,AVLT 损伤组有更多异常的阿尔茨海默病(AD)生物标志物,随时间推移有更多神经退行性变,并且更有可能发展为 AD。在本研究中,较高的 AD 多基因风险评分与成为 AVLT 损伤的几率增加相关(优势比 1.8,p<0.001)。因此,损伤严重程度不一定反映早发性和晚发性 aMCI,因为疾病进展不能改变多基因风险。假定的早期 MCI 可能是一个异质类别,其中包括过多的假阳性。额外的认知测试通过减少假阳性提高了诊断精度。损伤严重程度可能反映了潜在疾病风险的差异,但不能仅根据横断面数据推断早发性或晚发性 MCI。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

10
A global reference for human genetic variation.人类遗传变异的全球参考。
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):68-74. doi: 10.1038/nature15393.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验