The University of Queensland School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Nutrition and Dietetics Department, The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021 Jan;75(1):91-98. doi: 10.1038/s41430-020-0676-6. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Refeeding syndrome (RFS) can occur in severely malnourished or starved populations that are provided with rapid or unbalanced nutrition. International guidelines recommend a cautious approach for managing RFS risk (hypocaloric nutrition for 4-7 days), however emerging evidence supports a more assertive approach. This study aimed to describe nutritional management and RFS-related adverse outcomes in patients at risk of RFS receiving care after implementing updated guidelines reflecting emerging evidence.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of inpatients at risk of RFS during admission to a large metropolitan hospital in Queensland, Australia between November 2018 and April 2019 was conducted. Data were collected from medical records on nutritional management (provision of nutrition, electrolyte, and vitamin replacement) and outcomes (incidence of RFS, serum electrolyte decreases, hypo/hyperglycaemia, oedema, and organ function disturbance). Data were analysed descriptively; relationships between serum electrolyte decreases and nutrition management were explored using Fisher's Exact tests.
Of the 70 patients identified at risk of RFS (58.4 ± 16.8 years, 56% male, 94% malnourished), majority of participants received required supplementation prior to the commencement of nutrition (thiamine: 76%; micronutrients: 72-100%; multivitamin: 61%) and a standard initial nutrition management plan (79%; cautious: 13%; liberal: 8%). There were no cases of RFS. Four participants experienced RFS-related adverse outcomes (severe electrolyte decreases: n = 2, hypo/hyperglycaemia: n = 2); however, there was no differences in serum electrolyte decreases based on the nutrition management plan (initial: p = 0.912; goal: p = 0.688).
The implementation of more liberal RFS guidelines for the management of RFS risk appears to be safe. Further research examining liberalised refeeding protocols may be useful in updating international guidelines.
背景/目的:再喂养综合征(RFS)可发生于严重营养不良或饥饿人群,这些人群在接受快速或不平衡的营养时会出现 RFS。国际指南建议谨慎管理 RFS 风险(低热量营养 4-7 天),然而新出现的证据支持更积极的方法。本研究旨在描述在实施反映新出现证据的更新指南后,接受治疗的有 RFS 风险的患者的营养管理和与 RFS 相关的不良结局。
对 2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 4 月期间在澳大利亚昆士兰州一家大型都市医院住院的有 RFS 风险的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。从病历中收集营养管理(提供营养、电解质和维生素补充)和结局(RFS 的发生率、血清电解质降低、低血糖/高血糖、水肿和器官功能障碍)的数据。数据进行描述性分析;使用 Fisher 精确检验探索血清电解质降低与营养管理之间的关系。
在 70 名确定有 RFS 风险的患者中(58.4±16.8 岁,56%为男性,94%为营养不良),大多数患者在开始营养治疗前接受了所需的补充(硫胺素:76%;微量营养素:72-100%;多种维生素:61%)和标准的初始营养管理计划(79%;谨慎:13%;自由:8%)。没有 RFS 病例。有 4 名患者出现与 RFS 相关的不良结局(严重电解质降低:n=2,低血糖/高血糖:n=2);然而,根据营养管理计划,血清电解质降低没有差异(初始:p=0.912;目标:p=0.688)。
管理 RFS 风险的更自由的 RFS 指南的实施似乎是安全的。进一步研究更自由的再喂养方案可能有助于更新国际指南。