• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

活性物质恶唑磺隆农药风险评估的同行评审

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance oxasulfuron.

出版信息

EFSA J. 2017 Mar 13;15(3):e04722. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4722. eCollection 2017 Mar.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4722
PMID:32625433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7009934/
Abstract

The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Italy and co-rapporteur Member State Austria for the pesticide active substance oxasulfuron are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative use of oxasulfuron as a herbicide on soya beans. The reliable endpoints, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.

摘要

报告了欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)对报告成员国意大利和共同报告成员国奥地利的主管当局就农药活性物质环氧嘧磺隆进行的初始风险评估进行同行评审后的结论。同行评审的背景是委员会实施条例(EU)No 844/2012所要求的。这些结论是在对环氧嘧磺隆作为大豆除草剂的代表性使用进行评估的基础上得出的。列出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了监管框架要求提供但发现缺失的信息。识别出了相关问题。

相似文献

1
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance oxasulfuron.活性物质恶唑磺隆农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2017 Mar 13;15(3):e04722. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4722. eCollection 2017 Mar.
2
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pethoxamid.活性物质苯氧酰胺农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2017 Sep 20;15(9):e04981. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4981. eCollection 2017 Sep.
3
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance lenacil.活性物质利谷隆农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 5;22(7):e8860. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8860. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance tritosulfuron.活性物质甲基碘磺隆钠盐农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2023 Aug 9;21(8):e08142. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8142. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance bensulfuron-methyl.活性物质苄嘧磺隆农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2024 Sep 20;22(9):e8999. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8999. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance abamectin.活性物质阿维菌素农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2020 Aug 20;18(8):e06227. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6227. eCollection 2020 Aug.
7
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance amidosulfuron.活性物质胺苯磺隆农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2024 Sep 4;22(9):e8984. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8984. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance folpet.活性物质灭菌丹农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2023 Aug 18;21(8):e08139. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8139. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance S-metolachlor excluding the assessment of the endocrine disrupting properties.活性物质精异丙甲草胺农药风险评估的同行评审,不包括内分泌干扰特性评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Feb 28;21(2):e07852. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7852. eCollection 2023 Feb.
10
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance chlorpropham.活性物质氯苯胺灵农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2017 Jul 26;15(7):e04903. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4903. eCollection 2017 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Re-evaluation of saccharin and its sodium, potassium and calcium salts (E 954) as food additives.重新评估糖精及其钠盐、钾盐和钙盐(E 954)作为食品添加剂的安全性。
EFSA J. 2024 Nov 15;22(11):e9044. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9044. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Safety and efficacy of sodium saccharin when used as a feed flavour for piglets, pigs for fattening, calves for rearing and calves for fattening.糖精钠用作仔猪、育肥猪、育成犊牛和育肥牛的饲料调味剂时的安全性和有效性。
EFSA J. 2018 Mar 22;16(3):e05208. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5208. eCollection 2018 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (, spp. and solitary bees).关于植物保护产品对蜜蜂( 、 属及独居蜂)风险评估的修订指南
EFSA J. 2023 May 11;21(5):e07989. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7989. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Guidance on the assessment of exposure of operators, workers, residents and bystanders in risk assessment of plant protection products.植保产品风险评估中操作人员、工人、居民和旁观者暴露评估指南。
EFSA J. 2022 Jan 18;20(1):e07032. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7032. eCollection 2022 Jan.