• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance propiconazole.活性物质丙环唑农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2017 Jul 12;15(7):e04887. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4887. eCollection 2017 Jul.
2
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance mancozeb.活性成分代森锰锌农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2020 Dec 16;18(12):e05755. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5755. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance metrafenone.活性物质唑菌胺酯农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2023 May 22;21(5):e08012. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8012. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance chlorothalonil.活性物质百菌清农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 30;16(1):e05126. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5126. eCollection 2018 Jan.
5
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance sulfur.活性物质硫磺农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2023 Mar 8;21(3):e07805. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7805. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance trifloxystrobin.活性物质肟菌酯农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2017 Oct 20;15(10):e04989. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4989. eCollection 2017 Oct.
7
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance imazosulfuron.活性物质咪唑磺隆农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2017 Feb 15;15(2):e04695. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4695. eCollection 2017 Feb.
8
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance metconazole.活性物质甲环唑农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2023 Aug 24;21(8):e08141. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8141. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain M1.活性物质菌株M1农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2020 Nov 5;18(11):e06296. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6296. eCollection 2020 Nov.
10
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance folpet.活性物质灭菌丹农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2023 Aug 18;21(8):e08139. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8139. eCollection 2023 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Diverse Sublethal Effects of a Common Fungicide Impact the Behavior and Physiology of Honey Bees.一种常见杀菌剂的多种亚致死效应影响蜜蜂的行为和生理。
Insects. 2025 Jun 8;16(6):603. doi: 10.3390/insects16060603.
2
Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 55th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR).为在农药残留法典委员会(CCPR)第55届会议上制定欧盟立场提供科学支持。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 18;22(7):e8841. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8841. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
New Approach Methods for Hazard Identification: A Case Study with Azole Fungicides Affecting Molecular Targets Associated with the Adverse Outcome Pathway for Cholestasis.新型危害识别方法:以唑类杀真菌剂影响胆汁淤积不良结局途径相关分子靶标为例
Cells. 2022 Oct 19;11(20):3293. doi: 10.3390/cells11203293.
4
Evaluation of Pesticide Residues Occurrence in Random Samples of Organic Fruits and Vegetables Marketed in Poland.波兰市场上有机水果和蔬菜随机样本中农药残留情况的评估。
Foods. 2022 Jul 1;11(13):1963. doi: 10.3390/foods11131963.
5
Antibody Generation and Rapid Immunochromatography Using Time-Resolved Fluorescence Microspheres for Propiconazole: Fungicide Abused as Growth Regulator in Vegetable.使用时间分辨荧光微球针对丙环唑的抗体生成及快速免疫层析法:在蔬菜中被滥用作生长调节剂的杀菌剂
Foods. 2022 Jan 24;11(3):324. doi: 10.3390/foods11030324.
6
Scientific support for preparing an EU position for the 52nd Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR).为农药残留法典委员会(CCPR)第52届会议制定欧盟立场提供科学支持。
EFSA J. 2021 Aug 17;19(8):e06766. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6766. eCollection 2021 Aug.
7
Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for propiconazole.丙环唑第12条最大残留限量审查后的验证数据评估。
EFSA J. 2021 Feb 5;19(2):e06405. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6405. eCollection 2021 Feb.
8
Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 51st Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR).为在农药残留法典委员会(CCPR)第51届会议上制定欧盟立场提供科学支持。
EFSA J. 2019 Jul 31;17(7):e05797. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5797. eCollection 2019 Jul.
9
Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 50th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR).为欧盟在农药残留法典委员会(CCPR)第五十届会议上制定立场提供科学支持。
EFSA J. 2018 Jul 30;16(7):e05306. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5306. eCollection 2018 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (, spp. and solitary bees).关于植物保护产品对蜜蜂( 、 属及独居蜂)风险评估的修订指南
EFSA J. 2023 May 11;21(5):e07989. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7989. eCollection 2023 May.

活性物质丙环唑农药风险评估的同行评审。

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance propiconazole.

作者信息

Arena Maria, Auteri Domenica, Barmaz Stefania, Bellisai Giulia, Brancato Alba, Brocca Daniela, Bura Laszlo, Byers Harry, Chiusolo Arianna, Court Marques Daniele, Crivellente Federica, De Lentdecker Chloé, De Maglie Marcella, Egsmose Mark, Erdos Zoltan, Fait Gabriella, Ferreira Lucien, Goumenou Marina, Greco Luna, Ippolito Alessio, Istace Frederique, Jarrah Samira, Kardassi Dimitra, Leuschner Renata, Lythgo Christopher, Magrans Jose Oriol, Medina Paula, Miron Ileana, Molnar Tunde, Nougadere Alexandre, Padovani Laura, Parra Morte Juan Manuel, Pedersen Ragnor, Reich Hermine, Sacchi Angela, Santos Miguel, Serafimova Rositsa, Sharp Rachel, Stanek Alois, Streissl Franz, Sturma Juergen, Szentes Csaba, Tarazona José, Terron Andrea, Theobald Anne, Vagenende Benedicte, Verani Alessia, Villamar-Bouza Laura

出版信息

EFSA J. 2017 Jul 12;15(7):e04887. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4887. eCollection 2017 Jul.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4887
PMID:32625552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7010037/
Abstract

The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Finland, and co-rapporteur Member State, the United Kingdom, for the pesticide active substance propiconazole are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative use of propiconazole as a fungicide on wheat and barley. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.

摘要

欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)报告了对报告成员国芬兰和共同报告成员国英国的主管当局针对农药活性物质丙环唑开展的初步风险评估进行同行评审后的结论。同行评审的背景为委员会实施条例(欧盟)第844/2012号所要求的背景。这些结论是在对丙环唑作为杀菌剂在小麦和大麦上的代表性用途进行评估的基础上得出的。列出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了监管框架所要求的但被认定缺失的信息。识别出了一些问题。