Rychen Guido, Aquilina Gabriele, Azimonti Giovanna, Bampidis Vasileios, Bastos Maria de Lourdes, Bories Georges, Chesson Andrew, Flachowsky Gerhard, Gropp Jürgen, Kolar Boris, Kouba Maryline, López-Alonso Marta, López Puente Secundino, Mantovani Alberto, Mayo Baltasar, Ramos Fernando, Saarela Maria, Villa Roberto Edoardo, Wallace Robert John, Wester Pieter, Brantom Paul, Dierick Noël Albert, Herman Lieve, Glandorf Boet, Kärenlampi Sirpa, Aguilera Jaime, Anguita Montserrat, Cocconcelli Pier Sandro
EFSA J. 2018 Jul 4;16(7):e05342. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5342. eCollection 2018 Jul.
The additive under assessment is a muramidase from DSM 32338 which is to be used as a zootehcnical additive in feed for chickens for fattening and minor poultry species. The production strain is a genetically modified microorganism. The introduced genetic sequences do not give rise to safety concerns and no viable cells and no DNA of the production strain were detected in the additive. The results of a tolerance trial in chickens for fattening showed that the birds tolerated well 10-fold the highest recommended level of 45,000 LSU(F)/kg feed. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the additive is safe for chickens for fattening and extrapolated the conclusion to minor poultry species for fattening. The enzyme filtrate used to formulate the additive was tested in genotoxicity studies and in a subchronic oral toxicity study. The results of these tests did not indicate any reason for concern for consumer safety arising from the use of the product as a feed additive. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the additive is safe for the consumers. The Panel could not conclude on the potential of the additive for skin/eye irritancy or for its skin sensitisation potential. Owing to the proteinaceous nature of the active substance, the additive is considered to have potential for respiratory sensitisation. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the use of this product as a feed additive poses no risks to the environment. The additive is to be used as a zootechnical additive, functional group other additives. To support the efficacy, the applicant submitted three efficacy studies with comparable design. The results showed significant and positive improvements on the feed to gain ratio of the birds receiving the additive at the lowest recommended level (25,000 LSU(F)/kg feed). This conclusion was extrapolated to minor poultry species for fattening.
所评估的添加剂是一种来自DSM 32338的溶菌酶,拟用作育肥鸡和小型家禽饲料中的动物技术添加剂。生产菌株是一种转基因微生物。引入的基因序列不存在安全问题,且在添加剂中未检测到生产菌株的活细胞和DNA。育肥鸡耐受性试验结果表明,这些鸡对最高推荐水平45,000 LSU(F)/kg饲料的10倍剂量耐受性良好。因此,专家小组得出结论,该添加剂对育肥鸡是安全的,并将这一结论外推至育肥小型家禽。用于配制添加剂的酶滤液进行了遗传毒性研究和亚慢性经口毒性研究。这些试验结果未表明该产品用作饲料添加剂会对消费者安全造成任何担忧的理由。因此,专家小组得出结论,该添加剂对消费者是安全的。专家小组无法就该添加剂的皮肤/眼睛刺激性或皮肤致敏潜力得出结论。由于活性物质的蛋白质性质,该添加剂被认为具有呼吸道致敏潜力。饲料添加剂专家小组得出结论,将该产品用作饲料添加剂对环境无风险。该添加剂拟用作动物技术添加剂,功能组为其他添加剂。为证明其功效,申请人提交了三项设计可比的功效研究。结果表明,在最低推荐水平(25,000 LSU(F)/kg饲料)下,接受该添加剂的鸡的料重比有显著且积极的改善。这一结论被外推至育肥小型家禽。