Younes Maged, Aggett Peter, Aguilar Fernando, Crebelli Riccardo, Dusemund Birgit, Filipič Metka, Frutos Maria Jose, Galtier Pierre, Gundert-Remy Ursula, Kuhnle Gunter Georg, Lambré Claude, Leblanc Jean-Charles, Lillegaard Inger Therese, Moldeus Peter, Mortensen Alicja, Oskarsson Agneta, Stankovic Ivan, Waalkens-Berendsen Ine, Woutersen Rudolf Antonius, Wright Matthew, Tobback Paul, Mcardle Harry, Germini Andrea, Gott David
EFSA J. 2018 Aug 3;16(8):e05369. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5369. eCollection 2018 Aug.
The present opinion deals with the evaluation of the proposed increase of the currently authorised maximum amounts of ferric sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as a novel food ingredient used as a source of iron, and its extension of use in processed cereal-based foods and baby foods. The applicant also provided information on two forms of ferric sodium EDTA, one previously assessed by EFSA and a new one of finer consistency. To support the proposed changes to the uses of ferric sodium EDTA, the applicant proposed a revision of the current acceptable daily intake (ADI) for EDTA, derived from that set for the food additive calcium disodium EDTA (E 385). The Panel confirmed that ferric sodium EDTA is a source from which iron is bioavailable. In assessing the safety of the proposed revision to the existing specifications for the novel food ingredient ferric sodium EDTA, the Panel noted that this would not discriminate between the previously evaluated substance and the one of finer consistency. In particular, the Panel noted that particle size was not one of the proposed parameters for the revised specifications. The Panel noted that it was not possible to determine whether particles of ferric sodium EDTA in the nano range were present in the product with finer consistency in the solid form. The toxicological data submitted did not add any new relevant information to the database on which the current ADI for EDTA is based. Consequently, the Panel concluded that there was no sound scientific justification to increase the ADI for EDTA and hence increase the use levels of ferric sodium EDTA or introduce additional uses as proposed by the applicant. The Panel recommended that additional toxicological data should be provided to address the shortcomings in the available toxicity database prior to the re-evaluation of calcium disodium EDTA (E 385).
本意见涉及对将乙二胺四乙酸铁钠(EDTA)作为铁源的新型食品成分的当前批准最大使用量拟议增加情况的评估,以及其在加工谷物食品和婴儿食品中使用范围的扩大。申请人还提供了两种乙二胺四乙酸铁钠形式的信息,一种是之前由欧洲食品安全局评估过的,另一种是粒度更细的新形式。为支持对乙二胺四乙酸铁钠使用的拟议变更,申请人提议修订目前基于食品添加剂乙二胺四乙酸二钠钙(E 385)设定的EDTA每日允许摄入量(ADI)。专家小组确认乙二胺四乙酸铁钠是铁可生物利用的来源。在评估对新型食品成分乙二胺四乙酸铁钠现有规格拟议修订的安全性时,专家小组指出,这不会区分之前评估的物质和粒度更细的物质。特别是,专家小组指出粒度不是修订规格中拟议的参数之一。专家小组指出,无法确定固体形式粒度更细的产品中是否存在纳米级的乙二胺四乙酸铁钠颗粒。提交的毒理学数据未为目前EDTA的ADI所依据的数据库增添任何新的相关信息。因此,专家小组得出结论,没有充分的科学依据增加EDTA的ADI,从而增加乙二胺四乙酸铁钠的使用水平或按照申请人提议引入其他用途。专家小组建议在重新评估乙二胺四乙酸二钠钙(E 385)之前,应提供更多毒理学数据以弥补现有毒性数据库中的不足。