Ramsayer Beate, Fleming Valerie
Liverpool John Moores University, UK.
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Jul 6;27(8):969733020928416. doi: 10.1177/0969733020928416.
Traditionally, the role of midwives has been to be with women throughout the pregnancy continuum, from conception until the end of the postnatal period. Midwives, however, have been named as key providers of abortion services. While freedom of conscience is legally protected within Europe, discrepancies exist between midwifery and conscientious objection to abortion-related services. Midwives are largely ignored within the academic discussion despite the care and support they give to women undergoing abortions. Those discrepancies led to the aim of this article to address this issue by discussing some of the key ethical and legal concepts that are relevant to midwives' role in the provision of abortion services.This article shows that the decision to provide or object to abortion services remains ethically very complex because arguments exist both for and against its provision. Being with women can be interpreted differently and individual situations of care are multifaceted. Conscientious objection to abortion services is a highly contentious issue that has an overall importance to midwives. Noting that decisions are individual, may change or may be situationally dependant; a definitive position of midwives for or against conscientious objection cannot be assumed.Respecting conscience and acknowledging that there are various arguments for and against conscientious objection promotes widespread understanding. It accommodates both the opportunity for midwives to object on conscience grounds to the provision of abortion services and respect women's autonomy so that mutual agreement may be reached on issues that may have far reaching consequences.
传统上,助产士的职责是在整个孕期,从受孕到产后期末,一直陪伴女性。然而,助产士却被视为堕胎服务的主要提供者。虽然在欧洲,良心自由在法律上受到保护,但在助产与出于良心拒绝对堕胎相关服务之间仍存在差异。尽管助产士为接受堕胎手术的女性提供了护理和支持,但在学术讨论中,她们很大程度上被忽视了。这些差异促使本文旨在通过讨论一些与助产士在提供堕胎服务中角色相关的关键伦理和法律概念来解决这一问题。本文表明,提供或拒绝堕胎服务的决定在伦理上仍然非常复杂,因为支持和反对提供堕胎服务的论据都存在。陪伴女性可以有不同的解读,具体的护理情况也是多方面的。出于良心拒绝对堕胎服务是一个极具争议的问题,对助产士至关重要。需要注意的是,决定是因人而异的,可能会改变,也可能取决于具体情况;不能假定助产士对出于良心拒绝有明确的支持或反对立场。尊重良心并承认对于出于良心拒绝存在各种支持和反对的论据,有助于促进广泛的理解。这既为助产士基于良心拒绝提供堕胎服务提供了机会,又尊重了女性的自主权,从而可以就可能产生深远影响的问题达成相互一致。