• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的现实世界目标设定和结果测量的使用:多发性硬化症中物理治疗实践的欧洲调查。

Real-World Goal Setting and Use of Outcome Measures According to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A European Survey of Physical Therapy Practice in Multiple Sclerosis.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 108 00 Prague, Czech Republic.

Department of Statistical Modelling, Institute of Computer Science of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 07 Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 2;17(13):4774. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134774.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17134774
PMID:32630765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7369767/
Abstract

Goal setting is a core component of physical therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS). It is unknown whether and to what extent goals are set at different levels of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), and whether, and to which, standardized outcome measures are used in real life for evaluation at the different ICF levels. Our aim was to describe the real-world use of goal setting and outcome measures in Europe. An online cross-sectional survey, completed by 212 physical therapists (PTs) specialized in MS from 26 European countries, was conducted. Differences between European regions and relationships between goals and assessments were analyzed. PTs regularly set goals, but did not always apply the Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timed (SMART) criteria. Regions did not differ in the range of activities assessed, but in goals set (e.g., Western and Northern regions set significantly more goals regarding leisure and work) and outcome measures used (e.g., the Berg Balance Scale was more frequently used in Northern regions). Quality of life was not routinely assessed, despite being viewed as an important therapy goal. Discrepancies existed both in goal setting and assessment across European regions. ICF assists in understanding these discrepancies and in guiding improved health-care for the future.

摘要

目标设定是多发性硬化症(MS)物理治疗的核心组成部分。目前尚不清楚在国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的不同层面上是否以及在何种程度上设定了目标,以及在现实生活中是否以及在何种程度上使用了标准化的结局测量来评估不同的 ICF 层面。我们的目的是描述欧洲在现实世界中目标设定和结局测量的使用情况。对来自 26 个欧洲国家的 212 名专门从事 MS 治疗的物理治疗师(PT)进行了在线横断面调查。分析了欧洲各地区之间的差异以及目标与评估之间的关系。PT 经常设定目标,但并不总是应用具体、可衡量、可实现、现实和有时限(SMART)标准。各地区在评估的活动范围上没有差异,但在设定的目标(例如,西部和北部地区在休闲和工作方面设定了更多目标)和使用的结局测量上存在差异(例如,在北部地区更频繁地使用 Berg 平衡量表)。尽管生活质量被视为重要的治疗目标,但并未常规评估。欧洲各地区在目标设定和评估方面存在差异。ICF 有助于理解这些差异,并指导未来改善医疗保健。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819d/7369767/79cb094cc5a1/ijerph-17-04774-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819d/7369767/8b7234227f6b/ijerph-17-04774-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819d/7369767/d65796291172/ijerph-17-04774-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819d/7369767/1b167187e517/ijerph-17-04774-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819d/7369767/1c12ec00b4e2/ijerph-17-04774-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819d/7369767/f11b29d83222/ijerph-17-04774-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819d/7369767/6bc8ebed9728/ijerph-17-04774-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819d/7369767/79cb094cc5a1/ijerph-17-04774-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819d/7369767/8b7234227f6b/ijerph-17-04774-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819d/7369767/d65796291172/ijerph-17-04774-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819d/7369767/1b167187e517/ijerph-17-04774-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819d/7369767/1c12ec00b4e2/ijerph-17-04774-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819d/7369767/f11b29d83222/ijerph-17-04774-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819d/7369767/6bc8ebed9728/ijerph-17-04774-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819d/7369767/79cb094cc5a1/ijerph-17-04774-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Real-World Goal Setting and Use of Outcome Measures According to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A European Survey of Physical Therapy Practice in Multiple Sclerosis.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的现实世界目标设定和结果测量的使用:多发性硬化症中物理治疗实践的欧洲调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 2;17(13):4774. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134774.
2
European validation of The Comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for Osteoarthritis from the perspective of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip.从膝或髋骨关节炎患者角度对骨关节炎功能、残疾和健康国际分类综合核心集的欧洲验证
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Dec;40(26):3104-3112. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1377295. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
3
Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to support goal-setting practices in pediatric rehabilitation: a rapid review of the literature.运用《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》支持儿科康复中的目标设定实践:文献快速回顾。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Mar;43(6):884-894. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1643419. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
4
The use of goal attainment scaling in neuropsychological rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis.目标达成量表在多发性硬化症神经心理学康复中的应用。
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(21):1984-91. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.991452. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
5
The measurement of functioning using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: comparing qualifier ratings with existing health status instruments.使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类测量功能:qualifier 评级与现有健康状况量表的比较。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):541-548. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1381186. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
6
Comparative content review of children's participation measures using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Children and Youth.使用《国际功能、残疾和健康分类-儿童和青少年》对儿童参与措施进行比较内容审查。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1):141-52. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.027. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
7
Rehabilitation goals of people with spinal cord injuries can be classified against the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for spinal cord injuries.脊髓损伤患者的康复目标可依据《国际功能、残疾和健康分类:脊髓损伤核心集》进行分类。
Spinal Cord. 2016 Apr;54(4):324-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.155. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
8
ICF-inspired goal-setting in developmental rehabilitation: an innovative framework for pediatric therapists.以 ICF 为灵感的发育康复目标设定:儿科治疗师的创新框架。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Nov;37(11):1167-1176. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1692392. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
9
Validation of the comprehensive international classification of functioning, disability and health core set for diabetes mellitus: physical therapists' perspectives.验证《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》核心组合用于糖尿病的适用性:物理治疗师的观点。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Nov;92(11):968-79. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31829b4a6d.
10
Validation of the comprehensive international classification of functioning, disability and health core set for rheumatoid arthritis: the perspective of physical therapists.类风湿关节炎功能、残疾和健康国际综合分类核心集的验证:物理治疗师的视角
Phys Ther. 2007 Apr;87(4):368-84. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050237. Epub 2007 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Revision of the brief international classification of functioning, disability and health core set for multiple sclerosis: a study of the comprehensive icf core set for multiple sclerosis with participants referred for work ability assessment.修订简短国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心组合用于多发性硬化症:使用多发性硬化症综合国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心组合对工作能力评估参与者的研究。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 Mar 7;56:jrm19671. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.19671.
2
Human Functioning: Developments and Grand Challenges.人类机能:发展与重大挑战
Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Mar 10;1:617782. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2020.617782. eCollection 2020.
3
COMIRESTROKE-A clinical study protocol for monitoring clinical effect and molecular biological readouts of prehensive ntensive habilitation program after : A four-arm parallel-group randomized double blinded controlled trial with a longitudinal design.

本文引用的文献

1
Moving exercise research in multiple sclerosis forward (the MoXFo initiative): Developing consensus statements for research.推动多发性硬化症运动研究的发展(MoXFo 倡议):制定研究共识声明。
Mult Scler. 2020 Oct;26(11):1303-1308. doi: 10.1177/1352458520910360. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
2
Content and Delivery of Physical Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis across Europe: A Survey.欧洲多发性硬化症的物理治疗内容和方法:一项调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 31;17(3):886. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030886.
3
Rehabilitation the Health Strategy of the 21st Century, Really?
COMIRESTROKE——一项监测卒中后综合强化康复计划临床效果和分子生物学指标的临床研究方案:一项采用纵向设计的四臂平行组随机双盲对照试验。
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 1;13:954712. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.954712. eCollection 2022.
4
Outcome measures used in trials on gait rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: A systematic literature review.多 sclerosis 步态康复试验中使用的结局测量指标:系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 30;16(9):e0257809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257809. eCollection 2021.
5
Effectiveness of Dry Needling versus Placebo on Gait Performance, Spasticity, Electromyographic Activity, Pain, Range-of-Movement and Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.干针疗法与安慰剂对多发性硬化症患者步态表现、痉挛、肌电活动、疼痛、活动范围及生活质量的疗效:一项随机对照试验方案
Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 17;10(12):997. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120997.
6
Guest Editorial.特邀社论。
Int J MS Care. 2020 Nov-Dec;22(6):xiii-xiv. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073-22.6.xiii. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
21 世纪的健康战略——康复,真的吗?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Nov;100(11):2212-2214. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.05.019. Epub 2019 May 22.
4
Rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.多发性硬化症患者的康复治疗:Cochrane系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 14;1(1):CD012732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012732.pub2.
5
Responsiveness and meaningful improvement of mobility measures following MS rehabilitation.多发性硬化症康复后,移动能力测量的反应性和有意义的改善。
Neurology. 2018 Nov 13;91(20):e1880-e1892. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006532. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
6
Physiotherapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis across Europe: Regions and other factors that matter.欧洲多发性硬化症的物理治疗干预:重要的地区和其他因素。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 May;22:59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
7
The World Health Organization "Rehabilitation 2030: a call for action".世界卫生组织《2030年康复:行动呼吁》。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Apr;53(2):155-168. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04746-3. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
8
The organisation of physiotherapy for people with multiple sclerosis across Europe: a multicentre questionnaire survey.欧洲多发性硬化症患者的物理治疗组织:一项多中心问卷调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 6;16(1):552. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1750-6.
9
Rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.多发性硬化症的康复治疗:系统评价的系统综述
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Feb;98(2):353-367. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.016. Epub 2016 May 20.
10
Physical therapy provision in multiple sclerosis across Europe: a regional lottery?
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Dec;51(6):850-2. Epub 2015 Sep 2.