Suppr超能文献

基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的现实世界目标设定和结果测量的使用:多发性硬化症中物理治疗实践的欧洲调查。

Real-World Goal Setting and Use of Outcome Measures According to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A European Survey of Physical Therapy Practice in Multiple Sclerosis.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 108 00 Prague, Czech Republic.

Department of Statistical Modelling, Institute of Computer Science of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 07 Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 2;17(13):4774. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134774.

Abstract

Goal setting is a core component of physical therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS). It is unknown whether and to what extent goals are set at different levels of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), and whether, and to which, standardized outcome measures are used in real life for evaluation at the different ICF levels. Our aim was to describe the real-world use of goal setting and outcome measures in Europe. An online cross-sectional survey, completed by 212 physical therapists (PTs) specialized in MS from 26 European countries, was conducted. Differences between European regions and relationships between goals and assessments were analyzed. PTs regularly set goals, but did not always apply the Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timed (SMART) criteria. Regions did not differ in the range of activities assessed, but in goals set (e.g., Western and Northern regions set significantly more goals regarding leisure and work) and outcome measures used (e.g., the Berg Balance Scale was more frequently used in Northern regions). Quality of life was not routinely assessed, despite being viewed as an important therapy goal. Discrepancies existed both in goal setting and assessment across European regions. ICF assists in understanding these discrepancies and in guiding improved health-care for the future.

摘要

目标设定是多发性硬化症(MS)物理治疗的核心组成部分。目前尚不清楚在国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的不同层面上是否以及在何种程度上设定了目标,以及在现实生活中是否以及在何种程度上使用了标准化的结局测量来评估不同的 ICF 层面。我们的目的是描述欧洲在现实世界中目标设定和结局测量的使用情况。对来自 26 个欧洲国家的 212 名专门从事 MS 治疗的物理治疗师(PT)进行了在线横断面调查。分析了欧洲各地区之间的差异以及目标与评估之间的关系。PT 经常设定目标,但并不总是应用具体、可衡量、可实现、现实和有时限(SMART)标准。各地区在评估的活动范围上没有差异,但在设定的目标(例如,西部和北部地区在休闲和工作方面设定了更多目标)和使用的结局测量上存在差异(例如,在北部地区更频繁地使用 Berg 平衡量表)。尽管生活质量被视为重要的治疗目标,但并未常规评估。欧洲各地区在目标设定和评估方面存在差异。ICF 有助于理解这些差异,并指导未来改善医疗保健。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819d/7369767/8b7234227f6b/ijerph-17-04774-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验