TOBB ETU Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey.
Hatay State Hospital, Clinic of Ophthalmology, Hatay, Turkey.
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun 27;50(3):127-132. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2019.14554.
To compare the asphericity and higher-order aberration (HOA) outcomes of single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK) and conventional alcohol-assisted PRK (aaPRK) in patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism.
Of the 108 eyes of 54 patients enrolled in the study, tPRK was performed on 54 (50%) eyes and aaPRK was performed on 54 (50%) eyes. The following parameters were compared: corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), flat and steep keratometry, intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, asphericity, and HOAs including horizontal and vertical coma, horizontal and vertical trefoil, spherical aberration, second-order vertical coma, and aberration coefficient.
The demographic and baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups (p>0.05, for all). The aberration coefficient value was significantly lower in patients treated with aaPRK compared to patients treated with tPRK at postoperative 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year (p=0.022, p=0.019, and p=0.017, respectively). Differences in the other variables were statistically insignificant (p>0.05 for all).
Both tPRK and aaPRK procedures obtain similar postoperative CDVA, SE, asphericity, and HOA outcomes, except the aberration coefficient value.
比较单次经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术(tPRK)和传统酒精辅助准分子激光角膜切削术(aaPRK)治疗近视和近视散光患者的非球面性和高阶像差(HOA)结果。
本研究纳入了 54 例(108 只眼)患者,其中 54 只眼(50%)接受 tPRK 治疗,54 只眼(50%)接受 aaPRK 治疗。比较了以下参数:矫正远视力(CDVA)、等效球镜(SE)、平/陡角膜曲率计、眼压、中央角膜厚度、非球面性和 HOA,包括水平和垂直彗差、水平和垂直三叶草、球差、二阶垂直彗差和像差系数。
两组患者的人口统计学和基线特征相似(p>0.05,均为 P 值)。与 tPRK 组相比,aaPRK 组在术后 3 个月、6 个月和 1 年时的像差系数值明显更低(p=0.022、p=0.019 和 p=0.017)。其他变量的差异无统计学意义(p>0.05,均为 P 值)。
tPRK 和 aaPRK 两种手术均能获得相似的术后 CDVA、SE、非球面性和 HOA 结果,除了像差系数值。