Borkhoff Cornelia M, Imsirovic Haris, Bayoumi Imaan, Macarthur Colin, Nurse Kimberly M, To Teresa, Feldman Mark E, Lau Eddy, Knight Braden, Birken Catherine S, Maguire Jonathon L, Parkin Patricia C
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 26;20(6):e0326751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326751. eCollection 2025.
The Infant Toddler Checklist (ITC) may be promising as a single tool at the 18-month visit to detect a range of developmental concerns. We examined the predictive validity of the ITC; and the association between positive ITC screening and health care utilization (HCU).
Prospective cohort study of children at average-risk for developmental delay attending their 18-month visit in primary care in Toronto, Canada. Parents completed the ITC. HCU from the single-payer provincial health system was collected from health administrative databases ensuring complete follow-up. Physician billing code for a neurodevelopmental consultation was the primary outcome and criterion measure. Six other HCU types were assessed.
Of 1460 children with a mean age at screening of 18 months, 11% screened ITC positive. Mean age at follow-up was 8 years, 2.6% had a neurodevelopmental consultation. Screening test properties (with neurodevelopmental consultation as the criterion measure): 40% sensitivity (95% CI 24%, 57%), 90% specificity (95% CI 88%, 91%), 10% false positive rate (95% CI 9%, 12%). Using multivariable negative binomial regression, a positive ITC was associated with higher rates of 6 of 7 HCU types, including neurodevelopmental consultation (aRR 2.78, 95% CI 1.37, 5.67, p = 0.005).
The ITC had high specificity and a low false positive rate, suggesting that most children with a negative ITC will not have a later neurodevelopmental consultation, and use of the tool may minimize unintended harms such as anxiety and resource use. The low sensitivity highlights the importance of ongoing developmental surveillance. Low sensitivity of other screening tools is discussed.
婴幼儿检查表(ITC)可能有望作为一种单一工具,用于在18个月就诊时检测一系列发育问题。我们研究了ITC的预测效度;以及ITC筛查阳性与医疗保健利用(HCU)之间的关联。
对加拿大多伦多初级保健机构中发育迟缓平均风险儿童进行前瞻性队列研究,这些儿童在18个月时就诊。父母完成ITC。从卫生行政数据库收集来自单一支付者省级卫生系统的HCU数据,以确保完整随访。神经发育咨询的医生计费代码是主要结局和标准测量指标。还评估了其他六种HCU类型。
在1460名筛查时平均年龄为18个月的儿童中,11%的ITC筛查呈阳性。随访时的平均年龄为8岁,2.6%的儿童进行了神经发育咨询。筛查测试特性(以神经发育咨询作为标准测量指标):敏感性为40%(95%置信区间24%,57%),特异性为90%(95%置信区间88%,91%),假阳性率为10%(95%置信区间9%,12%)。使用多变量负二项回归分析,ITC阳性与7种HCU类型中的6种较高发生率相关,包括神经发育咨询(调整后风险比2.78,95%置信区间1.37,5.67,p = 0.005)。
ITC具有高特异性和低假阳性率,这表明大多数ITC筛查为阴性的儿童随后不会进行神经发育咨询,使用该工具可能会将焦虑和资源利用等意外危害降至最低。低敏感性凸显了持续进行发育监测的重要性。还讨论了其他筛查工具的低敏感性。