Suppr超能文献

经支气管动脉进行经导管药物递送治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎:这是虚构的还是有可能成为现实?

Transcatheter drug delivery through bronchial artery for COVID-19: is it fiction or could it come true?

作者信息

Zaitoun Mohamed M A, Basha Mohammad Abd Alkhalik, Elmokadem Ali Hassan

机构信息

Diagnostic Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Sharqiyah, Egypt.

Diagnostic Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

出版信息

Eur Radiol Exp. 2020 Jul 6;4(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s41747-020-00171-4.

Abstract

More than 1,200 active or recruiting clinical trials for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatments and vaccines are registered. Many drugs have shown promise for treatment of COVID-19. Nevertheless, up to date, no drugs have been confirmed as a definitive treatment for COVID-19. Trials such as the SOLIDARITY and RECOVERY are ongoing, and first results were announced in favour of therapy with dexamethasone with a significant trend showing greatest benefit among those patients requiring ventilation. The drawbacks of these trials include exposing the patients to drugs with well-documented systemic adverse effects or unknown complications of novel therapies without proof of clinical benefit. We present here the hypothesis that bronchial artery infusion could be an alternative for systemic drug infusion in COVID-19 trials with superadded benefits of high drug concentration and low systemic adverse effects. The concept of this idea has many uncertainties and no current clinical data to support. Perhaps, the technique should be first applied in animal models to determine its safety and calculate the effective dose of the drugs. Guidelines and reviews of pharmacotherapy for COVID-19 should be implemented for this fiction to come true.

摘要

目前已登记了1200多项针对2019年新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)治疗方法和疫苗的正在进行或招募患者的临床试验。许多药物已显示出治疗COVID-19的前景。然而,截至目前,尚无药物被确认为COVID-19的确定性治疗方法。诸如“团结试验”和“康复试验”等试验正在进行中,初步结果显示地塞米松治疗有效,且有显著趋势表明在需要通气的患者中获益最大。这些试验的缺点包括让患者接触有充分记录的全身性不良反应的药物,或新型疗法的未知并发症,却没有临床获益的证据。我们在此提出一个假设,即在COVID-19试验中,支气管动脉灌注可能是全身药物输注的一种替代方法,具有高药物浓度和低全身性不良反应的额外益处。这个想法的概念有很多不确定性,目前也没有临床数据支持。也许,该技术应首先应用于动物模型,以确定其安全性并计算药物的有效剂量。要实现这个设想,应该实施COVID-19药物治疗的指南和综述。

相似文献

6
Repurposing old drugs as antiviral agents for coronaviruses.将老药重新用作冠状病毒的抗病毒药物。
Biomed J. 2020 Aug;43(4):368-374. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2020.05.003. Epub 2020 May 23.
7
COVID-19: Stay Cool toward Corticosteroids.新冠疫情:对皮质类固醇保持冷静态度。
Keio J Med. 2020 Jun 25;69(2):27-29. doi: 10.2302/kjm.2020-0007-LE. Epub 2020 May 30.
8
COVID-19: Small-Molecule Clinical Trials Landscape.新冠病毒病(COVID-19):小分子药物临床试验全景
Curr Top Med Chem. 2020;20(18):1577-1580. doi: 10.2174/156802662018200703154334.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验