Zaitoun Mohamed M A, Basha Mohammad Abd Alkhalik, Elmokadem Ali Hassan
Diagnostic Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Sharqiyah, Egypt.
Diagnostic Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Eur Radiol Exp. 2020 Jul 6;4(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s41747-020-00171-4.
More than 1,200 active or recruiting clinical trials for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatments and vaccines are registered. Many drugs have shown promise for treatment of COVID-19. Nevertheless, up to date, no drugs have been confirmed as a definitive treatment for COVID-19. Trials such as the SOLIDARITY and RECOVERY are ongoing, and first results were announced in favour of therapy with dexamethasone with a significant trend showing greatest benefit among those patients requiring ventilation. The drawbacks of these trials include exposing the patients to drugs with well-documented systemic adverse effects or unknown complications of novel therapies without proof of clinical benefit. We present here the hypothesis that bronchial artery infusion could be an alternative for systemic drug infusion in COVID-19 trials with superadded benefits of high drug concentration and low systemic adverse effects. The concept of this idea has many uncertainties and no current clinical data to support. Perhaps, the technique should be first applied in animal models to determine its safety and calculate the effective dose of the drugs. Guidelines and reviews of pharmacotherapy for COVID-19 should be implemented for this fiction to come true.
目前已登记了1200多项针对2019年新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)治疗方法和疫苗的正在进行或招募患者的临床试验。许多药物已显示出治疗COVID-19的前景。然而,截至目前,尚无药物被确认为COVID-19的确定性治疗方法。诸如“团结试验”和“康复试验”等试验正在进行中,初步结果显示地塞米松治疗有效,且有显著趋势表明在需要通气的患者中获益最大。这些试验的缺点包括让患者接触有充分记录的全身性不良反应的药物,或新型疗法的未知并发症,却没有临床获益的证据。我们在此提出一个假设,即在COVID-19试验中,支气管动脉灌注可能是全身药物输注的一种替代方法,具有高药物浓度和低全身性不良反应的额外益处。这个想法的概念有很多不确定性,目前也没有临床数据支持。也许,该技术应首先应用于动物模型,以确定其安全性并计算药物的有效剂量。要实现这个设想,应该实施COVID-19药物治疗的指南和综述。