• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以患者为导向的研究中患者合作伙伴的作者身份及致谢指南。

Guidance on authorship with and acknowledgement of patient partners in patient-oriented research.

作者信息

Richards Dawn P, Birnie Kathryn A, Eubanks Kathleen, Lane Therese, Linkiewich Delane, Singer Lesley, Stinson Jennifer N, Begley Kimberly N

机构信息

Chronic Pain Network, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario Canada.

Five02 Labs Inc, Toronto, Ontario Canada.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jul 2;6:38. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00213-6. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-020-00213-6
PMID:32637153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7331134/
Abstract

The Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Chronic Pain Network was founded in 2016 and is a patient-oriented research network funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The Network incorporates patient partners throughout its governance and operations meaning that patient partners may contribute to research projects in ways that warrant scientific authorship as defined by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. The Network did a brief informal review of guidance on patient authorship in 2019, but could not find any practical documentation to guide its members on this topic. Note the term patient partner here refers to a patient (or caregiver or other person with lived experience) who is a partner or collaborator on a research team. This guidance does not address patients as participants in a research study. This guidance has been co-written by a group of researchers and patient partners of the Chronic Pain Network in an effort to address this gap. It is intended for both researchers and patient partner audiences. This guidance is meant to facilitate conversations between researchers and patient partners about authorship and/or acknowledgement regarding research projects on which they collaborate. While the overall principles of academic authorship and acknowledgement remain unchanged, nuances for interpreting these principles through the lens of patient engagement or patient-oriented research is provided. Teams that carry out patient-oriented research projects will require different preparation to empower all team members (researchers and patient partners) to discuss authorship and acknowledgement. To facilitate these conversations, we have included an overview of the scientific publishing process, explanation of some common terms, and sets of considerations are provided for both patient partners and researchers in determining the range of team member contribution from acknowledgement to authorship. Conversations about authorship can be difficult, even for established research teams. This guidance, and the resources discussed within it, are provided with the intention of making these conversations easier and more thoughtful.

摘要

以患者为导向的研究慢性疼痛网络战略成立于2016年,是一个由加拿大卫生研究院资助的以患者为导向的研究网络。该网络在其治理和运营过程中纳入了患者合作伙伴,这意味着患者合作伙伴可以以符合医学期刊编辑国际委员会所定义的科学作者身份的方式为研究项目做出贡献。该网络在2019年对患者作者身份的指导方针进行了简短的非正式审查,但未能找到任何实用文件来指导其成员处理这个问题。请注意,这里的“患者合作伙伴”一词指的是作为研究团队的合作伙伴或合作者的患者(或护理人员或其他有实际经验的人)。本指南不涉及作为研究参与者的患者。本指南由慢性疼痛网络的一组研究人员和患者合作伙伴共同撰写,旨在填补这一空白。它适用于研究人员和患者合作伙伴这两个受众群体。本指南旨在促进研究人员和患者合作伙伴之间就他们合作的研究项目的作者身份和/或致谢进行对话。虽然学术作者身份和致谢的总体原则保持不变,但提供了从患者参与或患者导向研究的角度解释这些原则的细微差别。开展以患者为导向的研究项目的团队需要不同的准备,以使所有团队成员(研究人员和患者合作伙伴)能够讨论作者身份和致谢。为了促进这些对话,我们提供了科学出版过程的概述、一些常用术语的解释,并为患者合作伙伴和研究人员提供了一系列考虑因素,以确定团队成员从致谢到作者身份的贡献范围。关于作者身份的对话可能很困难,即使对于成熟的研究团队也是如此。提供本指南以及其中讨论的资源,旨在使这些对话更容易、更有深度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a40/7331134/c118a1cc0f4f/40900_2020_213_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a40/7331134/56564f3de681/40900_2020_213_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a40/7331134/ae133bcb76ad/40900_2020_213_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a40/7331134/c118a1cc0f4f/40900_2020_213_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a40/7331134/56564f3de681/40900_2020_213_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a40/7331134/ae133bcb76ad/40900_2020_213_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a40/7331134/c118a1cc0f4f/40900_2020_213_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Guidance on authorship with and acknowledgement of patient partners in patient-oriented research.以患者为导向的研究中患者合作伙伴的作者身份及致谢指南。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jul 2;6:38. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00213-6. eCollection 2020.
2
Recognizing patient partner contributions to health research: a systematic review of reported practices.认识患者合作伙伴对健康研究的贡献:对已报道实践的系统评价
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Sep 9;9(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00488-5.
3
A rapid realist review of patient engagement in patient-oriented research and health care system impacts: part one.以患者为导向的研究中患者参与及医疗保健系统影响的快速实证综述:第一部分。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 10;7(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00299-6.
4
Exploring patient and caregiver perceptions of the meaning of the patient partner role: a qualitative study.探索患者及护理者对患者伴侣角色意义的认知:一项定性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 28;9(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00511-9.
5
Patient-identified priorities for successful partnerships in patient-oriented research.患者确定的以患者为导向的研究中成功合作的优先事项。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Sep 7;8(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00384-4.
6
Evaluating the impacts of patient engagement on a national health research network: results of a case study of the Chronic Pain Network.评估患者参与对国家卫生研究网络的影响:慢性疼痛网络案例研究结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Aug 30;9(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00491-w.
7
The dynamic nature of patient engagement within a Canadian patient-oriented kidney health research network: Perspectives of researchers and patient partners.加拿大以患者为导向的肾脏健康研究网络中患者参与的动态性质:研究人员和患者伙伴的观点。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):905-918. doi: 10.1111/hex.13716. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
8
Protocol for co-producing a framework and integrated resource platform for engaging patients in laboratory-based research.共同制定让患者参与实验室研究的框架和综合资源平台的方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 12;10(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00545-7.
9
"I think there has to be a mutual respect for there to be value": Evaluating patient engagement in a national clinical trial on de-implementation of low value care.“我认为要想实现价值,必须要有相互尊重”:评估患者在一项关于减少低价值医疗服务实施的全国性临床试验中的参与情况。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Aug 26;9(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00483-w.
10
Recognizing patient partner contributions to health research: a mixed methods research protocol.认识患者合作伙伴对健康研究的贡献:一项混合方法研究方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 6;8(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00354-w.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of acknowledgement and payment preferences of contributors on a register of patient public involvement in brain injury research.对脑损伤研究患者公众参与登记册上贡献者的致谢和支付偏好的综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Aug 19;11(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00772-6.
2
Balancing Care and Sacrifice: Lived Experiences and Support Needs of Primary Caregivers in Pediatric Chronic Pain Across Canada and Australia.平衡关怀与牺牲:加拿大和澳大利亚儿科慢性疼痛主要照顾者的生活经历与支持需求
Children (Basel). 2025 Jul 10;12(7):911. doi: 10.3390/children12070911.
3
Seven Actions Towards Advancing Patient Authorship and Collaboration in Peer-Reviewed Publications.

本文引用的文献

1
Researching what matters to improve chronic pain care in Canada: A priority-setting partnership process to support patient-oriented research.研究对改善加拿大慢性疼痛护理至关重要的因素:支持以患者为导向研究的优先事项设定合作过程。
Can J Pain. 2018 Jul 19;2(1):191-204. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2018.1433959. eCollection 2018.
2
A "dyadic dance": pain catastrophizing moderates the daily relationships between parent mood and protective responses and child chronic pain.一种“对偶舞蹈”:疼痛灾难化调节了父母情绪和保护反应与儿童慢性疼痛之间的日常关系。
Pain. 2020 May;161(5):1072-1082. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001799.
3
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.
推进患者在同行评审出版物中的作者身份和合作的七项行动。
Patient. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00750-w.
4
The Importance of Lived Experience: A Scoping Review on the Value of Patient and Public Involvement in Health Research.生活经历的重要性:关于患者和公众参与健康研究价值的范围综述
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70205. doi: 10.1111/hex.70205.
5
Co-Authoring and Reporting on Lived Experience Engagement in Mental Health and/or Substance Research: A Qualitative Study and Guidance Document.关于在心理健康和/或物质研究中共同撰写及报告生活经历参与情况:一项定性研究及指导文件
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70198. doi: 10.1111/hex.70198.
6
Enhancing patients' role in scientific writing: insights from a global participatory approach with people with multiple sclerosis.增强患者在科学写作中的作用:来自与多发性硬化症患者的全球参与式方法的见解。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Feb 24;11(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00687-2.
7
Patient partner engagement in the publication process: challenges and possible solutions.患者伴侣参与出版过程:挑战与可能的解决方案。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Feb 15;25(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02495-4.
8
Mapping the Gaps: A Scoping Review of Virtual Care Solutions for Caregivers of Children with Chronic Illnesses.填补差距:对慢性病患儿照料者虚拟护理解决方案的范围综述
Children (Basel). 2025 Jan 10;12(1):77. doi: 10.3390/children12010077.
9
Patient and public involvement in neonatal research - experiences and insights from parents and researchers.患者及公众参与新生儿研究——来自家长和研究人员的经验与见解
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jan 6;11(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00670-3.
10
From 'publish or perish' to 'publish with purpose': perspectives from young adults with lived and living experience on transforming academic publishing in patient-oriented research.从“不发表就出局”到“有目的地发表”:有亲身经历的年轻人对以患者为导向的研究中学术出版变革的看法。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Dec 20;10(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00668-x.
GRIPP2报告清单:改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
BMJ. 2017 Aug 2;358:j3453. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3453.
4
The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research.GRIPP 清单:提高患者和公众参与研究报告的质量。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Oct;27(4):391-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000481.