• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者确定的以患者为导向的研究中成功合作的优先事项。

Patient-identified priorities for successful partnerships in patient-oriented research.

作者信息

Santana Maria J, Duquette D'Arcy, Fairie Paul, Nielssen Ingrid, Bele Sumedh, Ahmed Sadia, Barbosa Tiffany, Zelinsky Sandra

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Sep 7;8(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00384-4.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-022-00384-4
PMID:36071538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9450417/
Abstract

Albertans4HealthResearch, supported by the Alberta Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Patient Engagement Team, hosted a virtual round table discussion to develop a list of considerations for successful partnerships in patient-oriented research. The group, which consists of active patient partners across the Canadian province of Alberta and some research staff engaged in patient-oriented research, considered advice for academic researchers on how to best partner with patients and community members on health research projects. The group identified four main themes, aligned with the national strategy for patient-oriented research (SPOR) patient engagement framework, highlighting important considerations for researchers from the patient perspective, providing practical ways to implement SPOR's key principles: inclusiveness, support, mutual respect, and co-building. This commentary considers the process behind this engagement exercise and offers advice directly from active patient research partners on how to fulfill the operational patient engagement mandate. Academic research teams can use this guidance when considering how to work together with patient partners and community members.

摘要

由艾伯塔省患者导向型研究患者参与团队支持的“艾伯塔省健康研究”组织举办了一场虚拟圆桌讨论,以制定一份关于患者导向型研究中成功合作的考量因素清单。该小组由加拿大艾伯塔省的活跃患者合作伙伴以及一些从事患者导向型研究的研究人员组成,他们为学术研究人员提供了关于如何在健康研究项目中与患者和社区成员最佳合作的建议。该小组确定了四个主要主题,与国家患者导向型研究战略(SPOR)患者参与框架相一致,从患者角度突出了研究人员的重要考量因素,提供了实施SPOR关键原则(包容性、支持、相互尊重和共同构建)的实用方法。本评论考虑了此次参与活动背后的过程,并直接提供了活跃患者研究合作伙伴关于如何履行患者参与运营任务的建议。学术研究团队在考虑如何与患者合作伙伴和社区成员合作时可以使用此指南。

相似文献

1
Patient-identified priorities for successful partnerships in patient-oriented research.患者确定的以患者为导向的研究中成功合作的优先事项。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Sep 7;8(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00384-4.
2
Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids.临床试验中的患者参与伙伴关系:患者伙伴和研究者决策辅助工具的开发。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):745-756. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00460-5. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
3
Operationalizing the principles of patient engagement through a Patient Advisory Council: Lessons and recommendations.通过患者顾问委员会使患者参与原则运作化:经验教训和建议。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13909. doi: 10.1111/hex.13909. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
4
Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences.患者参与加拿大卫生研究院战略导向研究项目资助研究的活动及影响:对学术研究人员和患者合作伙伴经历的横断面调查
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Aug 29;8(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00376-4.
5
Development, implementation, and scalability of the Family Engagement in Research Course: a novel online course for family partners and researchers in neurodevelopmental disability and child health.研究中的家庭参与课程的开发、实施与可扩展性:面向神经发育障碍和儿童健康领域家庭伙伴及研究人员的新型在线课程
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Aug 5;10(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00615-w.
6
Protocol for co-producing a framework and integrated resource platform for engaging patients in laboratory-based research.共同制定让患者参与实验室研究的框架和综合资源平台的方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 12;10(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00545-7.
7
"I think there has to be a mutual respect for there to be value": Evaluating patient engagement in a national clinical trial on de-implementation of low value care.“我认为要想实现价值,必须要有相互尊重”:评估患者在一项关于减少低价值医疗服务实施的全国性临床试验中的参与情况。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Aug 26;9(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00483-w.
8
A rapid realist review of patient engagement in patient-oriented research and health care system impacts: part one.以患者为导向的研究中患者参与及医疗保健系统影响的快速实证综述:第一部分。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 10;7(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00299-6.
9
Patient engagement in a national research network: barriers, facilitators, and impacts.患者参与国家研究网络:障碍、促进因素及影响
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 8;9(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00418-5.
10
Working together in health research: a mixed-methods patient engagement evaluation.健康研究中的合作:一项混合方法的患者参与度评估
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Aug 1;9(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00475-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Considerations for engaging in patient-oriented research with injured workers.与受伤工人开展以患者为导向的研究的注意事项。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 4;5:1589643. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1589643. eCollection 2025.
2
'Motivating Implicit Chinese to Express Themselves Is the Biggest Barrier': A Qualitative Study of Chinese Researchers' Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Patient Engagement in Research.“激发中文母语者表达自己是最大的障碍”:一项定性研究中国研究人员对患者参与研究的障碍和促进因素的看法。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70112. doi: 10.1111/hex.70112.
3
Key ingredients for successful collaboration in health research: perspectives of patient research partners.健康研究中成功合作的关键要素:患者研究伙伴的观点
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jun 5;10(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00590-2.
4
An Evaluation of Racial and Ethnic Representation in Research Conducted with Young Adults Diagnosed with Cancer: Challenges and Considerations for Building More Equitable and Inclusive Research Practices.评估在诊断为癌症的年轻成年人中进行的研究中的种族和民族代表性:建立更公平和包容的研究实践的挑战和考虑因素。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Apr 15;31(4):2244-2259. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31040166.
5
Acceptability of automatic referrals to supportive and palliative care by patients living with advanced lung cancer: qualitative interviews and a co-design process.晚期肺癌患者对自动转诊至支持性和姑息性护理的接受度:定性访谈与共同设计过程
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Apr 2;10(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00568-0.
6
Collaborating with patients and caregivers to create web-based educational resources for people affected by cirrhosis.与患者及护理人员合作,为肝硬化患者创建基于网络的教育资源。
PEC Innov. 2023 Aug 26;3:100201. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100201. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
7
Working together in health research: a mixed-methods patient engagement evaluation.健康研究中的合作:一项混合方法的患者参与度评估
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Aug 1;9(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00475-w.
8
Determining the benefits and drawbacks of parents using personal connections and social networks for recruitment in research projects: a qualitative study.确定父母利用私人关系和社交网络为研究项目招募参与者的利弊:一项定性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 26;9(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00470-1.
9
Co-building a training programme to facilitate patient, family and community partnership on research grants: A patient-oriented research project.合作共建培训项目,以促进患者、家庭和社区在研究资助方面的伙伴关系:一个以患者为中心的研究项目。
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1584-1595. doi: 10.1111/hex.13763. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
10
Co-learning commentary: a patient partner perspective in mental health care research.共同学习评论:心理健康护理研究中患者伙伴的视角
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 18;9(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00435-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Co-production: a kind revolution.共同制作:一场温和的革命。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Feb 5;8(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00340-2.
2
Operationalizing a patient engagement plan for health research: Sharing a codesigned planning template from a national clinical trial.将患者参与健康研究计划付诸实践:分享全国临床试验的共同设计规划模板。
Health Expect. 2022 Apr;25(2):697-711. doi: 10.1111/hex.13417. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
3
A rapid realist review of patient engagement in patient-oriented research and health care system impacts: part one.以患者为导向的研究中患者参与及医疗保健系统影响的快速实证综述:第一部分。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 10;7(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00299-6.
4
Co-designing strategies to support patient partners during a scoping review and reflections on the process: a commentary.在范围界定审查期间共同设计支持患者合作伙伴的策略及对该过程的思考:一篇评论
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 May 10;7(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00272-3.
5
Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the 'how' and 'what' of patient engagement in health research.加拿大的患者参与:对健康研究中患者参与的“方式”和“内容”的范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 7;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0282-4.
6
What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study.让消费者成功参与国民保健服务研究意味着什么?一项共识研究。
Health Expect. 2004 Sep;7(3):209-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00278.x.