Suppr超能文献

经鼻纤维支气管镜引导气管插管:不同剂量右美托咪定清醒镇静期间的患者舒适度、插管条件及血流动力学稳定性

Nasotracheal fiberoptic intubation: patient comfort, intubating conditions and hemodynamic stability during conscious sedation with different doses of dexmedetomidine.

作者信息

Dhasmana Satish Chandra

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, UP India.

出版信息

J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2014 Mar;13(1):53-8. doi: 10.1007/s12663-012-0469-0. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

Abstract

The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of two doses of dexmedetomidine for sedation during awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI). The study was designed in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded manner and carried out in an academic medical university. Forty young co-operative patients aged 15-45 years of either sex belonging to ASA class I-II, planned for elective maxillo-facial surgery formed the study group. All patients received midazolam 0.05 mg/kg, glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg, ondansetron 4 mg, and ranitidine 50 mg IV 15 min before as premedication, oxygen by nasal cannula, and topical local anesthetics to the airway. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the groups; dexmedetomedine 1 μg/kg IV (Group L), or dexmedetomidine 1.5 μg/kg IV (Group H). Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) was assessed. Primary outcome measurements were: HR, MAP, SpO2 and EtCO2 and secondary outcome measurements were: intubation scores by vocal cord movement, coughing and limb movement, fiberoptic intubation comfort score, nasotracheal intubation score and airway obstruction score. On the first post-operative day, recall, level of discomfort during fiberoptic intubation, adverse events and satisfaction score were also assessed. There were no significant hemodynamic differences between the two groups. OAA/S was significantly better with dexmedetomidine 1.5 μg/kg (p < 0.05) and patients were significantly calmer, more cooperative and satisfied during awake fiberoptic intubation with dexmedetomidine 1.5 μg/kg with fewer transient adverse effects. Dexmedetomidine 1.5 μg/kg proved to be more effective for sedation for awake fiberoptic intubation.

摘要

本研究旨在评估两种剂量的右美托咪定在清醒纤维支气管镜引导插管(AFOI)期间的镇静效果。该研究采用前瞻性、随机、双盲设计,在一所学术性医科大学进行。40例年龄在15 - 45岁、ASA分级为I - II级、计划行择期颌面外科手术的年轻合作患者组成了研究组。所有患者在术前15分钟静脉注射咪达唑仑0.05mg/kg、格隆溴铵0.2mg、昂丹司琼4mg和雷尼替丁50mg作为术前用药,通过鼻导管吸氧,并对气道使用局部麻醉药。患者被随机分配到以下两组之一:静脉注射右美托咪定1μg/kg(L组)或静脉注射右美托咪定1.5μg/kg(H组)。采用观察者警觉/镇静评分(OAA/S)进行评估。主要观察指标为:心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO₂)和呼气末二氧化碳分压(EtCO₂),次要观察指标为:声带运动、咳嗽和肢体运动的插管评分、纤维支气管镜引导插管舒适度评分、经鼻气管插管评分和气道梗阻评分。在术后第一天,还评估了回忆情况、纤维支气管镜引导插管期间的不适程度、不良事件和满意度评分。两组之间的血流动力学差异无统计学意义。右美托咪定1.5μg/kg组的OAA/S明显更好(p < 0.05),并且在清醒纤维支气管镜引导插管期间,使用右美托咪定1.5μg/kg的患者明显更平静、更合作且更满意,短暂不良反应更少。右美托咪定1.5μg/kg被证明在清醒纤维支气管镜引导插管镇静方面更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验