Suppr超能文献

骨缺损分类:矫形创伤协会开放性骨折分类的扩展。

Classification of Bone Defects: An Extension of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association Open Fracture Classification.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Orthopaedic Research Centre of Australia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2021 Feb 1;35(2):71-76. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001896.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop a post-traumatic bone defect classification scheme and complete a preliminary assessment of its reliability.

DESIGN

Retrospective classification.

SETTING

Tertiary referral trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Twenty open fractures with bone loss.

INTERVENTION

Assignment of a bone defect classification grade.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Open fractures were classified based on orthogonal radiographs, assessing the extent and local geometry of bone loss, including D1-incomplete defects, D2-minor/subcritical (complete) defects (<2 cm), and D3-segmental/critical-sized defects (≥2 cm). Incomplete defects (D1) include D1A-<25% cortical loss, D1B-25%-75% cortical loss, and D1C->75% cortical loss. Minor/subcritical (complete) defects (<2 cm) (D2) include D2A-2 oblique ends allowing for possible overlap, D2B-one end oblique/one end transverse, and D2C-2 transverse ends. Segmental/critical-sized Defects (≥2 cm) include D3A-moderate defects, 2 to <4 cm; D3B-major defects, 4 to <8 cm; and D3C-massive defects, ≥8 cm. Reliability was assessed among 3 independent observers using Fleiss' kappa tests.

RESULTS

Interobserver reliability demonstrated the classification scheme has very good agreement, κ = 0.8371, P < 0.0005. Intraobserver reliability was excellent, κ = 1.000 (standard error 0.1478-0.1634), P < 0.00001. Interobserver reliability for the distinction between categories alone (D1, D2, or D3) was also excellent, κ = 1.000 (standard error 0.1421-0.1679), P < 0.00001.

CONCLUSIONS

This classification scheme provides a robust guide to bone defect assessment that can potentially facilitate selection of the most appropriate treatment strategy to optimize clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

制定一种创伤后骨缺损分类方案,并对其可靠性进行初步评估。

设计

回顾性分类。

地点

三级转诊创伤中心。

患者/参与者:20 例伴有骨丢失的开放性骨折。

干预措施

分配骨缺损分类等级。

主要观察指标

根据正交 X 线片对开放性骨折进行分类,评估骨丢失的范围和局部形态,包括 D1-不完全缺损、D2-小/亚临界(完全)缺损(<2cm)和 D3-节段/临界尺寸缺损(≥2cm)。不完全缺损(D1)包括 D1A-<25%皮质丢失、D1B-25%-75%皮质丢失和 D1C->75%皮质丢失。小/亚临界(完全)缺损(<2cm)(D2)包括 D2A-2 个斜端允许可能重叠、D2B-一个斜端和一个横端、D2C-2 个横端。节段/临界尺寸缺损(≥2cm)包括 D3A-中度缺损,2-<4cm;D3B-主要缺损,4-<8cm;D3C-大量缺损,≥8cm。采用 Fleiss κ 检验对 3 名独立观察者的可靠性进行评估。

结果

观察者间可靠性表明,分类方案具有非常好的一致性,κ=0.8371,P<0.0005。观察者内可靠性极好,κ=1.000(标准误 0.1478-0.1634),P<0.00001。单独分类(D1、D2 或 D3)的观察者间可靠性也极好,κ=1.000(标准误 0.1421-0.1679),P<0.00001。

结论

该分类方案为骨缺损评估提供了一种稳健的指导,可能有助于选择最合适的治疗策略,以优化临床结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验