Horn B D, Rettig M E
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bellevue Hospital Center, New York, New York.
J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7(4):357-60. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199308000-00012.
The Gustilo and Anderson classification system is widely used to categorize open fractures. To assess its interobserver reliability, 10 patients with open fractures had photographic slides taken of their wound before and after operative treatment. These slides were then shown to a group of orthopaedic surgeons. After an explanation of the Gustilo and Anderson classification system and each patient's pertinent history and physical examination, the physicians were asked to classify the fracture. Agreement among the various raters was determined by Kappa analysis, which is the preferred measurement of interobserver reliability for nominal data such as classification schemes. Kappa analysis demonstrated only moderate agreement among the observers classifying open fractures using the Gustilo and Anderson system. This seems to indicate that, although useful, the Gustilo and Anderson open fracture classification system does have limitations; studies and treatment recommendations based on it should be interpreted with caution.
Gustilo和Anderson分类系统被广泛用于对开放性骨折进行分类。为评估其观察者间的可靠性,对10例开放性骨折患者在手术治疗前后拍摄了伤口的照片幻灯片。然后将这些幻灯片展示给一组骨科医生。在解释了Gustilo和Anderson分类系统以及每位患者的相关病史和体格检查后,要求医生对骨折进行分类。通过Kappa分析确定不同评分者之间的一致性,Kappa分析是用于分类方案等名义数据的观察者间可靠性的首选测量方法。Kappa分析表明,使用Gustilo和Anderson系统对开放性骨折进行分类的观察者之间只有中等程度的一致性。这似乎表明,尽管Gustilo和Anderson开放性骨折分类系统有用,但确实存在局限性;基于该系统的研究和治疗建议应谨慎解读。