• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

噻嗪类利尿剂的使用与强化降压治疗的非糖尿病患者心力衰竭风险降低有关。

Thiazide Use and Decreased Risk of Heart Failure in Nondiabetic Patients Receiving Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment.

机构信息

From the Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Toranomon Hospital Kajigaya, Kanagawa, Japan (T.T.).

Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, Center Hospital, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan (T.T., H.K.).

出版信息

Hypertension. 2020 Aug;76(2):432-441. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15154. Epub 2020 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15154
PMID:32639892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7340223/
Abstract

The SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) study reported that intensive blood pressure (BP) treatment with a systolic BP target of <120 mm Hg decreased the risks of cardiovascular events. However, it remains unknown whether specific medications can further improve cardiovascular outcome in patients receiving intensive BP treatment. This study examined whether thiazide use improves cardiovascular outcome in patients receiving intensive BP treatment. We used data of nondiabetic patients receiving intensive BP treatment in the SPRINT study. The primary outcome was a composite end point of myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, heart failure, or cardiovascular death. We analyzed hazard ratios for outcomes with 95% CIs in patients taking thiazides compared with those not taking thiazides using Cox proportional hazard models. This study included 2847 patients and the mean follow-up period was 3.3 years. The risk of primary outcome events was significantly lower in patients taking thiazides than in those not taking thiazides in both entire and propensity score-matched cohorts. Particularly, heart failure risk was significantly lower in those taking thiazides. These associations were also observed in various subgroups. In addition, thiazide use was associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality. Hypokalemia occurred more frequently in patients taking thiazides than in those not taking thiazides. Thiazide use decreased risk of cardiovascular events, particularly heart failure, in nondiabetic high-risk patients receiving intensive BP treatment.

摘要

SPRINT(收缩压干预试验)研究报告称,将收缩压目标值控制在<120mmHg 以下的强化血压治疗可降低心血管事件的风险。然而,目前尚不清楚特定药物是否可以进一步改善接受强化血压治疗的患者的心血管结局。本研究旨在探讨噻嗪类药物的使用是否可以改善接受强化血压治疗的患者的心血管结局。我们使用 SPRINT 研究中接受强化血压治疗的非糖尿病患者的数据。主要终点是心肌梗死、急性冠状动脉综合征、卒中等复合终点。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型分析了服用噻嗪类药物与未服用噻嗪类药物患者的结局风险比及其 95%置信区间。这项研究共纳入 2847 例患者,平均随访时间为 3.3 年。在整个队列和倾向评分匹配队列中,服用噻嗪类药物的患者主要结局事件的风险均明显低于未服用噻嗪类药物的患者。特别是,服用噻嗪类药物的心力衰竭风险显著降低。在各种亚组中也观察到了这些关联。此外,噻嗪类药物的使用与全因死亡率降低相关。服用噻嗪类药物的患者比未服用噻嗪类药物的患者更易发生低钾血症。噻嗪类药物的使用可降低接受强化血压治疗的非糖尿病高危患者的心血管事件风险,特别是心力衰竭风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f61/7340223/dae769749b60/hyp-76-432-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f61/7340223/523fd48c5ba7/hyp-76-432-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f61/7340223/dae769749b60/hyp-76-432-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f61/7340223/523fd48c5ba7/hyp-76-432-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f61/7340223/dae769749b60/hyp-76-432-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Thiazide Use and Decreased Risk of Heart Failure in Nondiabetic Patients Receiving Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment.噻嗪类利尿剂的使用与强化降压治疗的非糖尿病患者心力衰竭风险降低有关。
Hypertension. 2020 Aug;76(2):432-441. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15154. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
2
Thiazide Use and Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Well-Controlled Blood Pressure.噻嗪类利尿剂的使用与血压控制良好的 2 型糖尿病患者的心血管事件。
Hypertension. 2019 Dec;74(6):1541-1550. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13886. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
3
Efficacy of Patient Activation Interventions With or Without Financial Incentives to Promote Prescribing of Thiazides and Hypertension Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial.患者激活干预措施(有或没有财务激励)对噻嗪类药物的开具和高血压控制的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185017. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5017.
4
Benefit and harm of intensive blood pressure treatment: Derivation and validation of risk models using data from the SPRINT and ACCORD trials.强化血压治疗的益处与危害:利用收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)和控制糖尿病患者心血管风险行动(ACCORD)试验数据推导和验证风险模型
PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 17;14(10):e1002410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002410. eCollection 2017 Oct.
5
Are thiazide diuretics safe and effective antihypertensive therapy in kidney transplant recipients?噻嗪类利尿剂在肾移植受者中作为安全有效的降压治疗药物?
Am J Nephrol. 2013;38(4):285-91. doi: 10.1159/000355135. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
6
Role of Diuretics in Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: A Post Hoc Analysis.利尿剂在收缩压干预试验中的心血管事件和死亡率中的作用:事后分析。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 May 1;19(5):620-627. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000406. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
7
Potential Deaths Averted and Serious Adverse Events Incurred From Adoption of the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) Intensive Blood Pressure Regimen in the United States: Projections From NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey).在美国采用收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)强化血压治疗方案避免的潜在死亡和发生的严重不良事件:来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的预测
Circulation. 2017 Apr 25;135(17):1617-1628. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025322. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
8
Clinical benefit of systolic blood pressure within the target range among patients with or without diabetes mellitus: a propensity score-matched analysis of two randomized clinical trials.在有或没有糖尿病的患者中,收缩压处于目标范围内的临床获益:两项随机临床试验的倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Med. 2022 Jun 20;20(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02407-z.
9
Clinical Outcomes by Race and Ethnicity in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT): A Randomized Clinical Trial.种族和民族对收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)临床结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Hypertens. 2017 Dec 8;31(1):97-107. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpx138.
10
Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Control in SPRINT-Eligible Participants of ACCORD-BP.SPRINT 试验符合条件的 ACCORD-BP 参与者强化与标准血压控制的比较。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Dec;40(12):1733-1738. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1366. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of first-line antihypertensive drug class and intensity on NT-proBNP improvement and cardiovascular outcomes among hypertensive patients with pre-heart failure: findings from SPRINT trial.一线降压药物类别和强度对射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者NT-proBNP改善及心血管结局的影响:来自收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)的结果
Hypertens Res. 2024 Dec;47(12):3447-3457. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01873-7. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
2
Mechanisms of thiazide-induced hypertension treatment: insights from gene expression and histological analysis in malignant stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats.噻嗪类利尿剂引起高血压治疗的机制:恶性卒中倾向自发性高血压大鼠基因表达和组织学分析的见解。
J Hypertens. 2024 Dec 1;42(12):2084-2093. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003837. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Cardiovascular and Safety Outcomes of Chlorthalidone vs Hydrochlorothiazide to Treat Hypertension.比较氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪治疗高血压的心血管和安全性结局。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Apr 1;180(4):542-551. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.7454.
2
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2019年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.
3
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.
Unsupervised clustering identified clinically relevant metabolic syndrome endotypes in UK and Taiwan Biobanks.无监督聚类在英国生物银行和台湾生物银行中识别出了具有临床相关性的代谢综合征内型。
iScience. 2024 Apr 25;27(7):109815. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109815. eCollection 2024 Jul 19.
4
Prioritizing the primary prevention of heart failure: Measuring, modifying and monitoring risk.优先考虑心力衰竭的一级预防:测量、改变和监测风险。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Jan-Feb;82:2-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2024.01.001. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
5
Role of Diuretics in Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: A Post Hoc Analysis.利尿剂在收缩压干预试验中的心血管事件和死亡率中的作用:事后分析。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 May 1;19(5):620-627. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000406. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
6
Impact of Antihypertensive Drug Class on Outcomes in SPRINT.SPRINT 研究中降压药种类对结局的影响。
Hypertension. 2022 May;79(5):1112-1121. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18369. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.
4
Blood Pressure Measurement in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).SPRINT 中的血压测量(收缩压干预试验)。
Hypertension. 2018 May;71(5):848-857. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10479. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
5
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国医师协会/美国心脏病学学会/美国预防医学学院/美国老年病学会/美国药剂师协会/美国血液学会/美国预防医学学会/美国医学协会/美国初级保健医师学会成人高血压预防、检测、评估和管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):e13-e115. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000065. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
6
Comparison of thiazide-like diuretics versus thiazide-type diuretics: a meta-analysis.噻嗪样利尿剂与噻嗪类利尿剂的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Cell Mol Med. 2017 Nov;21(11):2634-2642. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13205. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
7
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
8
The Propensity Score.倾向评分
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1637-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13480.
9
2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8).2014 年成人高血压管理的循证指南:第八届联合国家委员会(JNC 8)任命的专家组报告。
JAMA. 2014 Feb 5;311(5):507-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284427.
10
2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会降低心血管风险生活方式管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2960-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 12.