Suppr超能文献

阿卡波糖对冠心病合并糖耐量受损患者新发糖尿病及血糖恢复正常的影响:ACE试验的见解

Impact of Acarbose on Incident Diabetes and Regression to Normoglycemia in People With Coronary Heart Disease and Impaired Glucose Tolerance: Insights From the ACE Trial.

作者信息

Gerstein Hertzel C, Coleman Ruth L, Scott Charles A B, Xu Shishi, Tuomilehto Jaakko, Rydén Lars, Holman Rury R

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Diabetes Trials Unit, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2020 Sep;43(9):2242-2247. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2046. Epub 2020 Jul 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We examined the impact of acarbose, an α-glucosidase inhibitor, on incident diabetes and regression to normoglycemia in 6,522 Acarbose Cardiovascular Evaluation (ACE) trial participants in China who had impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and coronary heart disease (CHD).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned to acarbose or placebo and followed with four monthly fasting plasma glucose (FPG) tests and annual oral glucose tolerance tests. Incident diabetes was defined as two successive diagnostic FPG levels ≥7 mmol/L or 2-h plasma glucose (PG) levels ≥11.1 mmol/L while taking study medication or a masked adjudicated confirmation of this diagnosis. Regression to normoglycemia was defined as FPG <6.1 mmol/L and 2-h PG <7.8 mmol/L. Intention-to-treat and on-treatment analyses were conducted using Poisson regression models, overall and for subgroups (age, sex, CHD type, HbA, FPG, 2-h PG, BMI, estimated glomerular filtration rate, for IGT alone, for IGT + impaired fasting glucose, and for use of thiazides, ACE inhibitors [ACEis]/angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs], β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or statins).

RESULTS

Incident diabetes was less frequent with acarbose compared with placebo (3.2 and 3.8 per 100 person-years, respectively; rate ratio 0.82 [95% CI 0.71, 0.94], = 0.005), with no evidence of differential effects within the predefined subgroups after accounting for multiple testing. Regression to normoglycemia occurred more frequently in those randomized to acarbose compared with placebo (16.3 and 14.1 per 100 person-years, respectively; 1.16 [1.08, 1.25], < 0.0001). This effect was greater in participants not taking an ACEi or ARB (1.36 [1.21, 1.53], = 0.0006). The likelihood of remaining in normoglycemic regression did not differ between the acarbose and placebo groups ( = 0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Acarbose reduced the incidence of diabetes and promoted regression to normoglycemia in Chinese people with IGT and CHD.

摘要

目的

我们在中国6522名患有糖耐量受损(IGT)和冠心病(CHD)的阿卡波糖心血管评估(ACE)试验参与者中,研究了α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂阿卡波糖对新发糖尿病及血糖恢复正常的影响。

研究设计与方法

参与者被随机分配至阿卡波糖组或安慰剂组,并接受每月一次的空腹血糖(FPG)检测及每年一次的口服葡萄糖耐量试验。新发糖尿病定义为在服用研究药物期间,连续两次诊断性FPG水平≥7 mmol/L或2小时血浆葡萄糖(PG)水平≥11.1 mmol/L,或经盲法判定确诊。血糖恢复正常定义为FPG<6.1 mmol/L且2小时PG<7.8 mmol/L。采用泊松回归模型进行意向性分析和治疗中分析,整体及按亚组分析(年龄、性别、冠心病类型、糖化血红蛋白、FPG、2小时PG、体重指数、估计肾小球滤过率,单独IGT、IGT+空腹血糖受损,以及使用噻嗪类药物、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂[ACEI]/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂[ARB]、β受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂或他汀类药物的情况)。

结果

与安慰剂相比,阿卡波糖组新发糖尿病的发生率更低(分别为每100人年3.2例和3.8例;率比0.82[95%CI 0.71, 0.94],P = 0.005),在考虑多重检验后,在预定义亚组中无差异效应的证据。与安慰剂相比,随机分配至阿卡波糖组的参与者血糖恢复正常的情况更频繁(分别为每100人年16.3例和14.1例;1.16[1.08, 1.25],P<0.0001)。在未服用ACEI或ARB的参与者中这种效应更大(1.36[1.21, 1.53],P = 0.0006)。阿卡波糖组和安慰剂组血糖恢复正常后维持的可能性无差异(P = 0.41)。

结论

阿卡波糖降低了中国IGT和CHD患者的糖尿病发生率,并促进血糖恢复正常。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验