Zhang Jiaqiang, Qin Lei, Chen Ho-Min, Hsu Han-Chuan, Chuang Chih-Chi, Chen Dar, Wu Szu-Yuan
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
School of Statistics, University of International Business and Economics Beijing, China.
Am J Cancer Res. 2020 Jun 1;10(6):1808-1820. eCollection 2020.
To estimate the outcomes of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for bulky or advanced-stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC).
We enrolled patients who had been diagnosed as having cervical SCC or ADC and received definitive CCRT. A Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI); independent predictors were stratified or controlled for in the analysis, and the endpoint was all-cause mortality among patients with cervical SCC and ADC who received CCRT. Propensity score matching was performed to create well-balanced groups.
we enrolled 3258 patients who had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer without distant metastasis. Among them, 2927 patients with cervical SCC and 331 patients with cervical ADC received definitive CCRT. The results of multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that ADC, advanced FIGO stage, no intracavitary brachytherapy, old age, earlier year of diagnosis, and higher comorbidity scores were significant independent poor prognostic factors of all-cause mortality in patients with cervical cancer who received definitive CCRT. Patients with cervical ADC who received definitive CCRT had higher all-cause mortality, locoregional recurrence (LRR), and distant metastasis (DM) (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 2.10 [1.79-2.46], 1.79 [1.35-2.37], and 1.97 [1.54-2.53] for all-cause mortality, LRR, and DM, respectively) compared with patients with cervical SCC who received CCRT.
Definitive CCRT in patients with cervical ADC resulted in lower overall survival, higher LRR, and higher DM rate compared with patients with cervical SCC.
评估针对体积较大或晚期宫颈鳞状细胞癌(SCC)和腺癌(ADC)进行根治性同步放化疗(CCRT)的疗效。
我们纳入了被诊断为宫颈SCC或ADC并接受根治性CCRT的患者。进行Cox回归分析以确定风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(95%CI);在分析中对独立预测因素进行分层或控制,终点为接受CCRT的宫颈SCC和ADC患者的全因死亡率。进行倾向评分匹配以创建均衡的组。
我们纳入了3258例国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期为IB2-IVA且无远处转移的宫颈癌患者。其中,2927例宫颈SCC患者和331例宫颈ADC患者接受了根治性CCRT。多因素Cox回归分析结果表明,ADC、较高的FIGO分期、未行腔内近距离放疗、老年、较早的诊断年份以及较高的合并症评分是接受根治性CCRT的宫颈癌患者全因死亡率的显著独立不良预后因素。与接受CCRT的宫颈SCC患者相比,接受根治性CCRT的宫颈ADC患者有更高的全因死亡率、局部区域复发(LRR)和远处转移(DM)(全因死亡率、LRR和DM的调整后HR[95%CI]分别为2.10[1.79 - 2.46]、1.79[1.35 - 2.37]和1.97[1.54 - 2.53])。
与宫颈SCC患者相比,宫颈ADC患者接受根治性CCRT导致总体生存率较低、LRR较高和DM率较高。