Zhang Jiaqiang, Qin Lei, Chen Ho-Min, Hsu Han-Chuan, Chuang Chih-Chi, Chen Dar, Wu Szu-Yuan
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
School of Statistics, University of International Business and Economics Beijing, China.
Am J Cancer Res. 2020 Jun 1;10(6):1793-1807. eCollection 2020.
To estimate the outcome patterns and predictors of curative surgery for cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) for overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence (LRR), and distant metastasis (DM), we enrolled 4628 patients who had received a diagnosis of cervical SCC or ADC and received curative surgery. Cox regression analysis was employed to calculate hazard ratios and confidence intervals (CIs); independent predictors were controlled for or stratified in the analysis, and the endpoint was all-cause death. Propensity score matching was conducted to create well-balanced groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the pathologic type of ADC, age ≥ 70 years, advanced pathologic stage, positive margin, poorly differentiated cancer, undifferentiated cancer, adjuvant sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy, earlier year of diagnosis, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) = 1, CCI ≥ 2, low income levels, and treatment at a nonmedical center were significant independent poor prognostic factors for all-cause mortality in cervical cancer treated with curative surgery. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% CIs) for patients with cervical ADC who received curative surgery were 2.34 (1.96-2.79), 1.15 (0.89-1.49), and 2.16 (1.75-2.66) compared with cervical SCC for all-cause mortality, LRR, and DM, respectively. This study indicated that curative surgery for cervical ADC was associated with poorer OS and higher DM rates relative to cervical SCC, but no significant differences were identified in LRR.
为了评估宫颈鳞状细胞癌(SCC)和腺癌(ADC)根治性手术后的生存结局模式及总生存(OS)、局部区域复发(LRR)和远处转移(DM)的预测因素,我们纳入了4628例经诊断为宫颈SCC或ADC并接受了根治性手术的患者。采用Cox回归分析计算风险比和置信区间(CI);在分析中对独立预测因素进行控制或分层,终点为全因死亡。进行倾向评分匹配以创建均衡组。多因素Cox回归分析表明,ADC的病理类型、年龄≥70岁、病理分期晚期、切缘阳性、低分化癌、未分化癌、辅助序贯化疗和放疗、诊断年份较早、Charlson合并症指数(CCI)=1、CCI≥2、低收入水平以及在非医疗中心接受治疗是接受根治性手术的宫颈癌患者全因死亡的显著独立不良预后因素。接受根治性手术的宫颈ADC患者相对于宫颈SCC患者,全因死亡、LRR和DM的调整后风险比(95%CI)分别为2.34(1.96 - 2.79)、1.15(0.89 - 1.49)和2.16(1.75 - 2.66)。本研究表明,相对于宫颈SCC,宫颈ADC根治性手术的OS较差且DM率较高,但在LRR方面未发现显著差异。