• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

LABA/LAMA 固定剂量组合与 LAMA 单药治疗在预防 COPD 加重中的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations LAMA monotherapy in the prevention of COPD exacerbations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung.

Department of Pharmacy, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung.

出版信息

Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020 Jan-Dec;14:1753466620937194. doi: 10.1177/1753466620937194.

DOI:10.1177/1753466620937194
PMID:32643547
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7350046/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) monotherapy is recommended for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with high risk of exacerbations. It is unclear whether long-acting β2-agonist (LABA)/LAMA fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) are more effective than LAMAs alone in preventing exacerbations. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature to investigate whether LABA/LAMA FDCs are more effective than LAMA monotherapy in preventing exacerbations.

METHODS

We searched several databases and manufacturers' websites to identify relevant randomized clinical trials comparing LABA/LAMA FDC treatment with LAMAs alone ⩾24 weeks. Outcomes of interest were time to first exacerbation and rates of moderate to severe, severe and all exacerbations.

RESULTS

We included 10 trials in 9 articles from 2013 to 2018 with a total of 19,369 patients for analysis in this study. Compared with LAMA monotherapy, LABA/LAMA FDCs demonstrated similar efficacy in terms of time to first exacerbation [hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-1.18;  = 0.71], moderate to severe exacerbations [risk ratio (RR), 0.96; 95% CI 0.90-1.03;  = 0.28], severe exacerbations (RR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.81-1.03;  = 0.15), and a marginal superiority in terms of all exacerbations (RR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.86-1.00;  = 0.04). The incidence of all exacerbation events was lower in the LABA/LAMA FDC group for the COPD patients with a history of previous exacerbations and those with a longer treatment period (52-64 weeks).

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that LABA/LAMA FDCs are marginally superior in the prevention of all exacerbations compared with LAMA monotherapy in patients with COPD.

摘要

背景

长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)单药治疗被推荐用于有高加重风险的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者。长效β2-激动剂(LABA)/LAMA 固定剂量组合(FDC)在预防加重方面是否优于单独的 LAMA 尚不清楚。本研究旨在系统回顾文献,以调查 LABA/LAMA FDC 是否比 LAMA 单药治疗更能预防加重。

方法

我们搜索了多个数据库和制造商的网站,以确定比较 LABA/LAMA FDC 治疗与单独使用 LAMA 治疗 ⩾24 周的相关随机临床试验。我们关注的结局是首次加重的时间和中重度、重度和所有加重的发生率。

结果

我们纳入了 2013 年至 2018 年的 9 篇文章中的 10 项试验,共有 19369 名患者纳入本研究进行分析。与 LAMA 单药治疗相比,LABA/LAMA FDC 在首次加重时间方面显示出相似的疗效[风险比,0.96;95%置信区间(CI)0.79-1.18; = 0.71]、中重度加重[风险比(RR),0.96;95%CI 0.90-1.03; = 0.28]、重度加重(RR,0.92;95%CI 0.81-1.03; = 0.15),在所有加重方面有轻微优势[RR,0.92;95%CI 0.86-1.00; = 0.04]。在有既往加重史和治疗时间较长(52-64 周)的 COPD 患者中,LABA/LAMA FDC 组的所有加重事件发生率较低。

结论

本研究提供了证据,表明与 LAMA 单药治疗相比,LABA/LAMA FDC 对 COPD 患者的所有加重预防有轻微优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1818/7350046/258344cb8c9e/10.1177_1753466620937194-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1818/7350046/3c6df6755905/10.1177_1753466620937194-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1818/7350046/7820c0c7a817/10.1177_1753466620937194-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1818/7350046/090f3d25a5b3/10.1177_1753466620937194-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1818/7350046/d50f1ebc3ef4/10.1177_1753466620937194-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1818/7350046/2f791955b969/10.1177_1753466620937194-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1818/7350046/258344cb8c9e/10.1177_1753466620937194-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1818/7350046/3c6df6755905/10.1177_1753466620937194-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1818/7350046/7820c0c7a817/10.1177_1753466620937194-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1818/7350046/090f3d25a5b3/10.1177_1753466620937194-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1818/7350046/d50f1ebc3ef4/10.1177_1753466620937194-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1818/7350046/2f791955b969/10.1177_1753466620937194-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1818/7350046/258344cb8c9e/10.1177_1753466620937194-fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations LAMA monotherapy in the prevention of COPD exacerbations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.LABA/LAMA 固定剂量组合与 LAMA 单药治疗在预防 COPD 加重中的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020 Jan-Dec;14:1753466620937194. doi: 10.1177/1753466620937194.
2
Dual combination therapy versus long-acting bronchodilators alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review and network meta-analysis.双重联合疗法与长效支气管扩张剂单药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的疗效比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 3;12(12):CD012620. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012620.pub2.
3
LABA/LAMA combinations versus LAMA monotherapy or LABA/ICS in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.长效β2受体激动剂/长效毒蕈碱受体拮抗剂联合治疗与长效毒蕈碱受体拮抗剂单药治疗或长效β2受体激动剂/吸入性糖皮质激素治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Mar 17;12:907-922. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S130482. eCollection 2017.
4
Once daily long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists in a combined inhaler versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.每日一次长效β2受体激动剂与长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂联合吸入器治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病对比安慰剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 6;3(3):CD012930. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012930.pub2.
5
Long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting β-agonist combination for the treatment of maintenance therapy-naïve patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a narrative review.长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂和长效β-激动剂联合治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病维持治疗初治患者:叙事性综述。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2024 Jan-Dec;18:17534666241279115. doi: 10.1177/17534666241279115.
6
Efficacy of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler (BGF MDI) Versus Other Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist/Long-Acting β-Agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) Triple Combinations in COPD: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis.布地奈德/格隆溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗干粉吸入剂(BGF MDI)对比其他吸入性皮质类固醇/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂/长效β激动剂(ICS/LAMA/LABA)三联复方制剂治疗 COPD 的疗效:系统文献评价和网络荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jun;37(6):2956-2975. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01311-3. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
7
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Different Types of Inhaled Long-Acting β-Agonist Plus Inhaled Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist vs Inhaled Long-Acting β-Agonist Plus Inhaled Corticosteroid Fixed-Dose Combinations in COPD A Propensity Score-Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Cohort Study.不同类型的长效β激动剂加长效抗胆碱能药物与长效β激动剂加吸入性皮质类固醇固定剂量联合治疗 COPD 的疗效和安全性比较:一项倾向评分逆概率治疗加权队列研究。
Chest. 2021 Oct;160(4):1255-1270. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.025. Epub 2021 May 21.
8
LABA/LAMA versus LABA/ICS fixed-dose combinations in the prevention of COPD exacerbations: a modeling analysis of literature aggregate data.LABA/LAMA 与 LABA/ICS 固定剂量联合制剂在预防 COPD 加重中的作用:文献汇总数据的建模分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Oct;79(10):1321-1332. doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03543-y. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
9
Efficacy and Safety of LAMA/LABA Fixed-Dose Combination Therapies in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review of Direct and Indirect Treatment Comparisons.LABA/LAMA 固定剂量联合治疗在慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的疗效和安全性:直接和间接治疗比较的系统评价。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Jul 1;15:1529-1543. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S230955. eCollection 2020.
10
Systematic review and network meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler in comparison with other long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β-agonist fixed-dose combinations in COPD.系统评价和网络荟萃分析比较甘罗溴铵/福莫特罗富马酸盐定量吸入器与其他长效抗胆碱能药物/长效β-激动剂固定剂量复方制剂在 COPD 中的疗效和安全性。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2019 Jan-Dec;13:1753466619894502. doi: 10.1177/1753466619894502.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Management and Treatment Patterns in General Medicine: Results From the ASTER Study in Italy.了解普通内科中慢性阻塞性肺疾病的管理与治疗模式:意大利ASTER研究结果
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 Sep 4;20:3135-3145. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S517556. eCollection 2025.
2
Association of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity with reduction of acute exacerbation in COPD patients using a dual ultra-long-acting bronchodilators.中强度至高强度体力活动与 COPD 患者使用双重长效支气管扩张剂减少急性加重的关联。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 2;14(1):26440. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75702-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: the GOLD science committee report 2019.全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断、管理和预防策略:GOLD 科学委员会报告 2019.
Eur Respir J. 2019 May 18;53(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00164-2019. Print 2019 May.
2
Combined aclidinium bromide and long-acting beta2-agonist for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).溴化阿地氯铵与长效β2受体激动剂联合用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 11;12(12):CD011594. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011594.pub2.
3
Dual combination therapy versus long-acting bronchodilators alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Comparing Costs and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) Using LAMA versus LABA/ICS at Treatment Initiation for COPD: Findings from CITRUS (Comparing the Incidence of Tiotropium and ICS/LABA in Real-World Use in South Korea) Study.
比较 COPD 治疗起始时使用 LAMA 与 LABA/ICS 的成本和医疗资源利用(HCRU):来自 CITRUS(比较噻托溴铵和 ICS/LABA 在韩国真实世界使用中的发生率)研究的结果。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Jul 16;19:1661-1671. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S448492. eCollection 2024.
4
When is LABA/LAMA Better than LAMA in GOLD Group B or D Patients for Reducing Acute Exacerbations of COPD?对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)全球倡议(GOLD)B组或D组患者,在减少急性加重方面,长效β2受体激动剂/长效抗胆碱能药物何时比长效抗胆碱能药物更具优势?
Chonnam Med J. 2023 Sep;59(3):180-187. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2023.59.3.180. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
5
Inhaled Corticosteroids and the Risk of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Findings from a Nationwide Population-Based Study.吸入性糖皮质激素与慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者非结核分枝杆菌肺病风险:一项基于全国人群的研究结果
J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 30;13(7):1088. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071088.
6
Assessment of the Correlation Between Inflammatory Status and Severity of COVID-19: Experience from Tertiary Hospital in Iraq.评估炎症状态与 COVID-19 严重程度的相关性:来自伊拉克三级医院的经验。
Curr Microbiol. 2023 Jul 14;80(9):283. doi: 10.1007/s00284-023-03407-9.
7
LABA/LAMA as First-Line Therapy for COPD: A Summary of the Evidence and Guideline Recommendations.长效β2受体激动剂/长效抗胆碱能药物作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病的一线治疗:证据及指南推荐综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 8;11(22):6623. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226623.
双重联合疗法与长效支气管扩张剂单药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的疗效比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 3;12(12):CD012620. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012620.pub2.
4
LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations in patients with COPD: a systematic review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用长效β2受体激动剂/长效毒蕈碱受体拮抗剂固定剂量联合制剂的系统评价
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Oct 4;13:3115-3130. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S170606. eCollection 2018.
5
Tiotropium and olodaterol in the prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (DYNAGITO): a double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, active-controlled trial.噻托溴铵和奥达特罗预防慢性阻塞性肺疾病恶化(DYNAGITO):一项双盲、随机、平行分组、阳性对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 May;6(5):337-344. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30102-4. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
6
Efficacy and safety of tiotropium and olodaterol in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.噻托溴铵和奥达特罗治疗 COPD 的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Respir Res. 2017 Nov 25;18(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12931-017-0683-x.
7
Long-acting beta2-agonists versus long-acting muscarinic antagonists in patients with stable COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.长效β2受体激动剂与长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂用于稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Respirology. 2017 Oct;22(7):1313-1319. doi: 10.1111/resp.13100. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
8
Long-term safety and efficacy of glycopyrrolate/formoterol metered dose inhaler using novel Co-Suspension™ Delivery Technology in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.新型共悬浮™给药技术的格隆溴铵/福莫特罗定量吸入器在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的长期安全性和疗效
Respir Med. 2017 May;126:105-115. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 Mar 12.
9
LABA/LAMA combinations versus LAMA monotherapy or LABA/ICS in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.长效β2受体激动剂/长效毒蕈碱受体拮抗剂联合治疗与长效毒蕈碱受体拮抗剂单药治疗或长效β2受体激动剂/吸入性糖皮质激素治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Mar 17;12:907-922. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S130482. eCollection 2017.
10
A randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled, long-term extension study of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of fixed-dose combinations of aclidinium/formoterol or monotherapy in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.一项关于阿地溴铵/福莫特罗固定剂量组合或单一疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效、安全性和耐受性的随机双盲、安慰剂对照长期延申研究。
Respir Med. 2017 Apr;125:39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 16.