Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2020 Sep;17(9):408-415. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2020.1784427. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
The routes of COVID-19 transmission to healthcare personnel from infected patients is the subject of debate, but is critical to the selection of personal protective equipment. The objective of this paper was to explore the contributions of three transmission routes-contact, droplet, and inhalation-to the risk of occupationally acquired COVID-19 infection among healthcare personnel (HCP). The method was quantitative microbial risk assessment, and an exposure model, where possible model parameters were based on data specific to the SARS-CoV-2 virus when available. The key finding was that droplet and inhalation transmission routes predominate over the contact route, contributing 35%, 57%, and 8.2% of the probability of infection, on average, without use of personal protective equipment. On average, 80% of inhalation exposure occurs when HCP are near patients. The relative contribution of droplet and inhalation depends upon the emission of SARS-CoV-2 in respirable particles (<10 µm) through exhaled breath, and inhalation becomes predominant, on average, when emission exceeds five gene copies per min. The predicted concentration of SARS-CoV-2 in the air of the patient room is low (< 1 gene copy per m on average), and likely below the limit of quantification for many air sampling methods. The findings demonstrate the value of respiratory protection for HCP, and that field sampling may not be sensitive enough to verify the contribution of SARS-CoV-2 inhalation to the risk of occupationally acquired COVID-19 infection among healthcare personnel. The emission and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory droplets of different sizes is a critical knowledge gap for understanding and controlling COVID-19 transmission.
新冠病毒(COVID-19)从感染患者向医护人员传播的途径是一个争议话题,但这对于选择个人防护设备至关重要。本文旨在探讨接触、飞沫和吸入三种传播途径对医护人员(HCP)职业性感染 COVID-19 的风险的贡献。方法是定量微生物风险评估,以及暴露模型,在可能的情况下,当有 SARS-CoV-2 病毒的数据时,使用特定于该病毒的数据作为模型参数。关键发现是飞沫和吸入传播途径比接触途径更占主导地位,在不使用个人防护设备的情况下,平均分别贡献了感染概率的 35%、57%和 8.2%。平均而言,当 HCP 接近患者时,80%的吸入暴露发生。飞沫和吸入的相对贡献取决于呼出的呼吸颗粒(<10 μm)中 SARS-CoV-2 的排放,当排放超过每分钟 5 个基因拷贝时,吸入平均成为主要途径。患者房间空气中 SARS-CoV-2 的预测浓度较低(平均< 1 个基因拷贝/ m ),并且可能低于许多空气采样方法的定量下限。研究结果表明,呼吸保护对 HCP 具有重要价值,并且现场采样可能不足以验证 SARS-CoV-2 吸入对医护人员职业性感染 COVID-19 的风险的贡献。不同大小的呼吸道飞沫中 SARS-CoV-2 的排放和传染性是理解和控制 COVID-19 传播的一个关键知识空白。