Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis.
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;6(9):1410-1415. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2295.
A significant proportion of patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) after surgery, along with enumeration of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), may be used to detect minimal residual disease and assess which patients may experience disease recurrence.
To determine whether the presence of ctDNA and CTCs after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage TNBC is independently associated with recurrence and clinical outcomes.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A preplanned secondary analysis was conducted from March 26, 2014, to December 18, 2018, using data from 196 female patients in BRE12-158, a phase 2 multicenter randomized clinical trial that randomized patients with early-stage TNBC who had residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to receive postneoadjuvant genomically directed therapy vs treatment of physician choice. Patients had blood samples collected for ctDNA and CTCs at time of treatment assignment; ctDNA analysis with survival was performed for 142 patients, and CTC analysis with survival was performed for 123 patients. Median clinical follow-up was 17.2 months (range, 0.3-58.3 months).
Circulating tumor DNA was sequenced using the FoundationACT or FoundationOneLiquid Assay, and CTCs were enumerated using an epithelial cell adhesion molecule-based, positive-selection microfluidic device.
Primary outcomes were distant disease-free survival (DDFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).
Among 196 female patients (mean [SD] age, 49.6 [11.1] years), detection of ctDNA was significantly associated with inferior DDFS (median DDFS, 32.5 months vs not reached; hazard ratio [HR], 2.99; 95% CI, 1.38-6.48; P = .006). At 24 months, DDFS probability was 56% for ctDNA-positive patients compared with 81% for ctDNA-negative patients. Detection of ctDNA was similarly associated with inferior DFS (HR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.28-5.57; P = .009) and inferior OS (HR, 4.16; 95% CI,1.66-10.42; P = .002). The combination of ctDNA and CTCs provided additional information for increased sensitivity and discriminatory capacity. Patients who were ctDNA positive and CTC positive had significantly inferior DDFS compared with those who were ctDNA negative and CTC negative (median DDFS, 32.5 months vs not reached; HR, 5.29; 95% CI, 1.50-18.62; P = .009). At 24 months, DDFS probability was 52% for patients who were ctDNA positive and CTC positive compared with 89% for those who were ctDNA negative and CTC negative. Similar trends were observed for DFS (HR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.07-9.27; P = .04) and OS (HR, 8.60; 95% CI, 1.78-41.47; P = .007).
In this preplanned secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, detection of ctDNA and CTCs in patients with early-stage TNBC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with disease recurrence, which represents an important stratification factor for future postneoadjuvant trials.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02101385.
相当一部分早期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者接受新辅助化疗。手术后循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)的测序,以及循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)的计数,可用于检测微小残留疾病并评估哪些患者可能会经历疾病复发。
确定早期 TNBC 患者新辅助化疗后 ctDNA 和 CTC 的存在是否与复发和临床结局独立相关。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项从 2014 年 3 月 26 日至 2018 年 12 月 18 日进行的、来自 BRE12-158 试验的预设二次分析,该试验为一项多中心随机临床试验,入组了新辅助化疗后仍有残留疾病的早期 TNBC 患者,随机分配至接受新辅助后基于基因组的靶向治疗或医生选择的治疗。患者在治疗分配时采集血液样本进行 ctDNA 和 CTC 分析;对 142 名患者进行了 ctDNA 与生存分析,对 123 名患者进行了 CTC 与生存分析。中位临床随访时间为 17.2 个月(范围,0.3-58.3 个月)。
使用 FoundationACT 或 FoundationOneLiquid Assay 对循环肿瘤 DNA 进行测序,使用基于上皮细胞黏附分子的正选择微流控装置对 CTC 进行计数。
主要结局是远处无病生存(DDFS)、无病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)。
在 196 名女性患者(平均[标准差]年龄,49.6[11.1]岁)中,ctDNA 的检测与较差的 DDFS 显著相关(中位 DDFS,32.5 个月 vs 未达到;风险比[HR],2.99;95%CI,1.38-6.48;P=0.006)。在 24 个月时,ctDNA 阳性患者的 DDFS 概率为 56%,而 ctDNA 阴性患者的 DDFS 概率为 81%。ctDNA 的检测与较差的 DFS(HR,2.67;95%CI,1.28-5.57;P=0.009)和 OS(HR,4.16;95%CI,1.66-10.42;P=0.002)也有类似的相关性。ctDNA 和 CTC 的联合检测提供了额外的信息,提高了敏感性和区分能力。ctDNA 阳性和 CTC 阳性的患者与 ctDNA 阴性和 CTC 阴性的患者相比,DFS 显著较差(中位 DDFS,32.5 个月 vs 未达到;HR,5.29;95%CI,1.50-18.62;P=0.009)。在 24 个月时,ctDNA 阳性和 CTC 阳性患者的 DDFS 概率为 52%,而 ctDNA 阴性和 CTC 阴性患者的 DDFS 概率为 89%。DFS(HR,3.15;95%CI,1.07-9.27;P=0.04)和 OS(HR,8.60;95%CI,1.78-41.47;P=0.007)也有类似的趋势。
在这项新辅助化疗后早期 TNBC 患者的随机临床试验的预设二次分析中,ctDNA 和 CTC 的检测与疾病复发独立相关,这是未来新辅助试验的一个重要分层因素。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02101385。