Rahman Shaoon, Daveluy Steven
Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine
Wayne State University
Pathergy phenomenon has been well known to dermatologists since it was first described in 1937 by Blobner as a state of altered tissue reactivity in response to minor trauma. The pathergy test is a nonspecific hypersensitivity skin reaction induced by needle prick that is performed to look for evidence of this phenomenon. Pathergy lesions are generally manifested clinically by erythematous induration at the location of skin trauma, which may remain as papules or progress to sterile pustules. Although the precise mechanism of pathergy has not yet been entirely elucidated, the skin injury by needle prick in patients exhibiting pathergy is thought to trigger a cutaneous inflammatory response that is exaggerated and more prominent than that seen in normal skin. An increased release of cytokines from cells in the dermis or epidermis is implicated in this aberrant reaction, which results in the perivascular infiltrates that are characteristically observed on histopathologic studies. While pathergy has been reported in numerous diseases, pathergy testing is primarily used in the diagnosis of Behcet Disease (BD). Hulusi Behcet, a Turkish dermatologist, first characterized the clinical entity now known as BD by a triad of recurrent aphthous stomatitis, relapsing uveitis, and genital ulceration. Since it was initially described in 1937, BD has come to be known as a multisystemic inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology with many additional cutaneous, gastrointestinal, articular, vascular, cardiopulmonary, and neurological manifestations. The mucocutaneous lesions of the disease often exhibit the pathergy reaction with the formation of new lesions or aggravation of previous ones following trivial trauma. However, pathergy is not restricted exclusively to the skin and can be more generally described as a state of disease hyperreactivity in any organ after injury. Examples of the pathergy reaction in extracutaneous tissue sites of BD patients include the exacerbation of synovitis after arthrocentesis, the onset of uveitis following intraocular injections, and the formation of aneurysms around vascular anastomoses. Along with BD, pathergy is also widely reported in various other disorders, including neutrophilic dermatoses such as pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) and Sweet syndrome. In these other conditions, the term pathergy refers to the occurrence of lesions following trauma that closely parallel the pathology of the primary disease. This has some resemblance to the Koebner phenomenon that has been reported in other skin conditions and most well known in psoriasis. However, this is in contrast to the needle prick induced pathergy lesions seen in BD, which are usually histologically and grossly distinct from the lesions that naturally occur in the disease. Similar to other features of BD, pathergy is often seen in a relapsing-remitting pattern and is not always present throughout the disease course. There are significant variations in the prevalence of pathergy among different populations, and its incidence has been decreasing over the past few decades. Nevertheless, pathergy testing is still one of the most vital components of the diagnostic criteria for BD.
自1937年Blobner首次将同形反应现象描述为组织对轻微创伤反应性改变的一种状态以来,皮肤科医生就对其熟知。同形反应试验是一种由针刺诱发的非特异性超敏皮肤反应,用于寻找该现象的证据。同形反应性损害通常在临床上表现为皮肤创伤部位的红斑硬结,可表现为丘疹持续存在或发展为无菌性脓疱。尽管同形反应的确切机制尚未完全阐明,但针刺引起的皮肤损伤被认为会在出现同形反应的患者中引发一种皮肤炎症反应,这种反应比正常皮肤中所见的更为夸张和显著。真皮或表皮细胞中细胞因子释放增加与这种异常反应有关,这导致了组织病理学研究中典型观察到的血管周围浸润。虽然同形反应在多种疾病中均有报道,但同形反应试验主要用于白塞病(BD)的诊断。土耳其皮肤科医生Hulusi Behcet首次通过复发性口腔溃疡、复发性葡萄膜炎和生殖器溃疡三联征对现在所知的BD这一临床实体进行了描述。自1937年首次描述以来,BD已被认为是一种病因不明的多系统炎症性疾病,还有许多其他皮肤、胃肠道、关节、血管、心肺和神经方面的表现。该疾病的黏膜皮肤损害常表现出同形反应,轻微创伤后会形成新的损害或使先前的损害加重。然而,同形反应并不局限于皮肤,更普遍地可描述为任何器官在损伤后的疾病高反应状态。BD患者皮肤外组织部位的同形反应例子包括关节穿刺后滑膜炎加重、眼内注射后葡萄膜炎发作以及血管吻合口周围动脉瘤形成。除了BD,同形反应在各种其他疾病中也有广泛报道,包括嗜中性皮肤病,如坏疽性脓皮病(PG)和Sweet综合征。在这些其他情况下,同形反应一词指创伤后病变的发生与原发性疾病的病理过程密切平行。这与其他皮肤疾病中报道的Koebner现象有一些相似之处,在银屑病中最为人所知。然而,这与BD中所见的针刺诱发的同形反应性损害形成对比,后者在组织学和大体上通常与该疾病自然发生的损害不同。与BD的其他特征相似,同形反应常呈复发-缓解型,并非在整个病程中始终存在。不同人群中同形反应的患病率存在显著差异,且在过去几十年中其发病率一直在下降。尽管如此,同形反应试验仍然是BD诊断标准中最重要的组成部分之一。