Suppr超能文献

疫苗学:是否到了改变范式的时候?

Vaccinology: time to change the paradigm?

机构信息

Bandim Health Project, Indepth Network, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau; Research Centre for Vitamins and Vaccines, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Institute of Advanced Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Bandim Health Project, Indepth Network, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau; Bandim Health Project, Open Patient data Explorative Network, Institute of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):e274-e283. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30742-X. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

Abstract

The existing vaccine paradigm assumes that vaccines only protect against the target infection, that effective vaccines reduce mortality corresponding to the target infection's share of total mortality, and that the effects of vaccines are similar for males and females. However, epidemiological vaccine research has generated observations that contradict these assumptions and suggest that vaccines have important non-specific effects on overall health in populations. These include the observations that several live vaccines reduce the incidence of all-cause mortality in vaccinated compared with unvaccinated populations far more than can be explained by protection against the target infections, and that several non-live vaccines are associated with increased all-cause mortality in females. In this Personal View we describe current observations and contradictions and define six emerging principles that might explain them. First, that live vaccines enhance resistance towards unrelated infections. Second, non-live vaccines enhance the susceptibility of girls to unrelated infections. Third, the most recently administered vaccination has the strongest non-specific effects. Fourth, combinations of live and non-live vaccines given together have variable non-specific health effects. Fifth, vaccinating children with live vaccines in the presence of maternal immunity enhances beneficial non-specific effects and reduces mortality. Finally, vaccines might interact with other co-administered health interventions, for example vitamin A supplementation. The potential implications for child health are substantial. For example, if BCG vaccination was given to children at birth, if higher measles vaccination coverage could be obtained, if diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis-containing vaccines were not given with or after measles vaccine, or if the BCG strain with the best non-specific effects could be used consistently, then child mortality could be considerably lower. Pursuing these emerging principles could improve our understanding and use of vaccines globally.

摘要

现有的疫苗模式假设疫苗仅能预防目标感染,有效的疫苗能降低目标感染在总死亡率中所占的比例,而且疫苗对男性和女性的效果相似。然而,流行病学疫苗研究产生了一些观察结果,这些结果与这些假设相矛盾,并表明疫苗对人群的整体健康具有重要的非特异性影响。这些观察结果包括:几种活疫苗在接种疫苗的人群中降低全因死亡率的发生率远远超过了对目标感染的保护作用,以及几种非活疫苗与女性全因死亡率增加有关。在这篇个人观点中,我们描述了当前的观察结果和矛盾,并定义了六个可能解释这些结果的新出现的原则。第一,活疫苗增强了对不相关感染的抵抗力。第二,非活疫苗增加了女孩对不相关感染的易感性。第三,最近接种的疫苗具有最强的非特异性作用。第四,同时给予活疫苗和非活疫苗的组合具有不同的非特异性健康影响。第五,在存在母体免疫的情况下,用活疫苗给儿童接种可以增强有益的非特异性作用并降低死亡率。最后,疫苗可能与其他同时给予的卫生干预措施相互作用,例如维生素 A 补充。这对儿童健康的潜在影响是巨大的。例如,如果在出生时给儿童接种卡介苗,如果能获得更高的麻疹疫苗覆盖率,如果不给予或在麻疹疫苗之后给予含白喉、破伤风和百日咳的疫苗,如果能使用具有最佳非特异性作用的卡介苗株,那么儿童死亡率就会大大降低。探索这些新出现的原则可以提高我们对疫苗的理解和在全球范围内的使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验